PC 68-229,
~
~
_
:
:
_
:
~. r
: _
:
~_
....~
._.__
. _
_ ~
.
~..
~ _
._
_ _ . _. _ __._ _
~~.)
RESOLUTION N0. PC68-229
A RESOLUTION OF TH~ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
F.EOOMMENDING TO THE CITY ~UNCIL OF THE CII'Y OF ANAHEIM THAT
GENERAL PLAN AM~NDA7HNT N0. 104 BE DISAPPROViED
WHFREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim did adopt a Genexal Plan by
Resolution No. 63R-869f showing the general description and extent of land uses
within the City and indicating the present belief of the Council as to possible
future development and redevelopment of land within the City; and
WHERHAS~ the City Planning ~ommission of the City of Anaheim did initiate a
verified Petition for Reclassification No. 68-69-2~ which petition has implica-
tions on policies as expressed on said General Plan; and
WHEREAS, in addition to the notice of the hearing on said reclassification,
notice was also given regarding the consideration of an amendment to the General
Plan in the general location and vicinity of subject property of said reclassif i-
cation; and
WHERBAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing in the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on July 29, 1968 at 2:00 o'clock P.M.~ notice of said
public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with
the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, to hear and consider evidence for
and against said Amendment to the General Plan and said proposed Petition for
Reclassification to investigate and make findings and recommendations in con-
nection therewith; and
WHFREAS, said Commission after due inspection, investigation~ and study made
by itself and in its behalf and aft er due consideration of all evidence and re-
ports offered at said hearing, ~ES HF1tEHY FIND
1. That the pxoperties under consideration were designated in "A Study of
the Proble~n of Residential Homes Fronting on Arterial Highways'-' adopted
by the 'P] anning Commis~sion and the City Council ;as ki~eing appropriate for
conver~ion'.to comme'rcial-professional land use.
2. That the present general description and extent of land uses in the
aforementioned ar ea adequately represents past and current City policies
r egarding possible future development of said general area described as:
bounded on the north by Savoy Avenue; on the east by State College
Boulevard; on the south by South Street; and on the west by Dover Street.
3. That no evidence was presented at said hearing which would justify the
City Planning Commission recommending a change in the above-mentioned
policies to the ~ity Council.
4. That Exhibit "A" of General Plan Amendment No. 104 does not constitute
an acceptable alternative to current policies as illustrated on the Gen-
eral Plan.
5. That three persons appeared representing twelve persons present in the
Council Chamber and a petition signed by sixty-seven persons was re-
ceived all in opposition; and that one lettes of approval was received.
'.
..~ I
NOW, TF~REI~URE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Planning Commissi n of the City
of Anaheim does hereby recommend to the City Council of the City of Maheim that
subject General Plan Amendment be disapproved on the basis of the a orementioned
findings
TNfi FOREGOING RESOLUTION is sig ~d a d appx~~ed by me ~iis 8th day of August? 1968.
PRC.TEM, ANpHEIM CITY PLANNING
1 f ~
___.~.-~..~~~.... ` ~ .~....~.
ATTEST:
~~ ~%LL'~ i~'(Zc~Ls~~
SECRETARY Ai;nuEIM CITY PL7~NNING OOMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF pNAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs? Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting
of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, heid on July 29, 1968 at
2s00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: ~MMISSIONERS: Camp, Farano, Herbst, Mungall, Rowland
NOES: OOMMISSIONERS: None
~ ABSENT: QOMMISSIONF1tSs Allred, Gauer.
' IN WITN6SS WHFRB~F, I have hc~r eunto set my hand this 8th day of August, 1968.
~~'~JiL~t~ %~~~
SECRET,~RY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
229-2