Loading...
PC 68-269~~ ~ ~ ' ~ , r.. ~ ~.._._.. . ~` ~ ~. . ~ ... w•SM?:n!M~W'nKO~l.M1'1m~>+~,~..~.~. ~ .~ . ''~ ~ ~ ' RESOLUTIOh ,v0. PC68-269 ~-,~ ~ I , w R~OL~11110~! OIr '!~! C~YY ![./IAIpY10 C~DIm CR 'l111~ Cfl'Y O~ AAANI~ ' 'fNA! PlZil1~ !OR W1f81'I1alAL !!~ Pfi'! l.,~o~ APPROVED ~ .I i , i ' ~!lEREA~, fis GtY P1~1~ C1~lrio~ ~l tw C.it~ ol As~Mi~ ~H r~eMN ~ ~eif~! Rtlt~ bt Ca.. ~ diNadUNP«slt6eo MILTON E. JOHN50N, 1011 Louise Street, Santa Ana, ~alifornia 92703, Owner ~ of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of ~alifornia, described as a.portion of Lot Thirty-two of Anaheim Extens.ion as shown on a Map of Survey. made by William Hamel and filed in the office of the County Recorder of Los Angeles County. Beginning at the intersection of L.~e East line of Walnut Street with the southerly 'a line.of Santa Ana Street as said streets are shown on said map; thence Northeasterly 83.01 feet along the northerly line of said Lot 32 to the intersection with the Southwesterly line ;~ ',4 of Manchester Boulevard~ formerly the 100 foot right of way of the South~ern Pacific Railway; ~- thenr,e Southeasterly along said Boulevard 432.44 feet to a point; thence Southwesteriy 376.16~ ;f;" f?et on a line parallel with the Northerly line of Lot 32 to a point in the West line of ~ said Lot which is 404.99 feet South of a point of beginning; thence North along the West line~ of said Lot 32 to the point of beginning. EXCEPI'ING therefrom tne West 6.25 feet as conveyeci r to the City of Anaheim, for the purpose of widening the East half of Walnut Street, by deed { recorded February 1, 1910, in Book 177, page 35 of deeds: ALSO EXCEPT that portion thereof .~ lying Northerly of a line parallei with and distant 54.75 feet Southerly from the monumented { ., center line of West Santa Ana Street conveyed to the City of Anaheim, a municipal corporation,! for the widening of West Santa Ana Street, by Deed recorded April 14, 1939, in Book 988, 1 ' page 483 of Official Records. , i ~sd NH~E~A~y IY. clqr Pl~ Cad..h. w raN . wiUc YNaa at tr. c~t~lt~a le tr citf or a.~.+. oeS ept emb er 11, 196d, at 2:Od e'cbak *.11., ssfk~ d wN ivlk M~aieg M~l~~ bwn daly ~Iwn ~ M~+9~~'M b iw ~a/ la aoooeiaeos vdM ~ pwr~tal~ ~t tM A~ieb~ Y~dci~al ooi~. Ci~br 1~.~4. tc 4Nr ~ ~ad caasid~r Ni~et Io~ r1 ~I~t wl~ ~ ooe~tjoMl w ~~ ~o la~ a/ e~b ~p ~d ~-' ~ ~iaa~ la oorsetla~ t~1M; asd ~lIOlEA'.1, W/ Ca~~lMio~. ~I2~t iw 6~et~o~~ ~, ~rd ~, ed~ by ItM1I ~ed ia lb be- e~lt~ ~d ~ v aouli~e~tlo~ m( W~sliwoe r/ w~at~ olf~w~ .t ~ iwl~, ~iow 8sd ~sd deta.iae the bUo~la~ fsela; 1. Y'het tbe propoad ~w i~ propsrlq oaa ~oe d!d ~ Ca~tl.ad Ua~ P~t i~ wtrorlsed b~ Code: Section 18.52.050(1-a and 1-c) to wits establish an existing trucking yard and terminal with related autio and truck overhauling and repair facilities as a confoxming use with waivers of: I SECTION 18.52.060~3-a) - Reauired masonry wall. (6-foot masonrv wall abutting s ~`'~ residentially zoned property required; existing 6-foot 5 chainlink f nc proposed), 1 SECTION 18.52.060 3-b -• Repuired enclosure of outdoor uses. (6-foot masonrv ' wall reGuired; 6-foot chainlink f ence proposed). 2. That the petitioner withdrew the request for waiver of the required masonry wall ~ and stipulated to construction of a 7-foot masonry wall along the south property lineo ':~ 3. That the proposed 7-foot masonry wall along the south property line would act as ~ an effective screen as regaQds to visual and audio intrusions of equipment and materials - stored and operated in the trucking yard area for the low-density residential area to the south; therefore, under authority of Section 18.64.070, waiver of the required enclosure I of outdonr storage areas is hereby granted. ' I 4. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the ' growth and development of the area in ivhich it is proposed to be located. ! ~ 5. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to a11ow the i ! ful.l development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor ~ to :the.peace, health, safety and general welfare of the Citi2ens of the City of Anaheim. 6. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the conditions imposed, i{ j any, will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the '~ Citizens of the City of Anaheim. j , 7. That the petitioner and~or lesses is urged to make every effort possible to reduce { ~ to.a minimum excessive noise from trucks entering and leaving the premises between the hours; of .11 p.m., and 6 a.m. to avoid having complaints filed with the City that the operation ~ has become a nuisance and health hazard to the Citizens of the City of Anaheim. ' 8. That one person appeared representing six persons present in the Councii Chamber, *' and a oetition .signed by 10 p ersons was received, ail in opposition at the f irst public ~'.~'t~~~"~''' hearina, howevPr nar+,a~ ~n.,~~;+,,.., . . _ ,.,.... ...: i~ a----•- -.~ ...~ - - - • - - ' - / ~ ' -~ ~J HOM, TNEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED th~t the Mohr~lm Clty Pl~ening Costsiuion does haeby grant subject P~tltla+ for CondlUond Use Pamit, upon the following conditioaa which ate hereby fonnd to be s neceaeary prerequisite bo tht peopos~d uoe of the subject ptop~rty in oeder to pnes~rve the s~Eety and ~enenl welEare ofthe Cftizens of the City of Aa~aheim: 1. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Walnut Street, for street lighting purposes. requiredTbyttheeCityaE gine ~~andainraccordan eawi~hsstandardrplans'eandlspecificationseon~file in the office of~the City Engineer. 3. That any existing driveways along Walnut Street, w hich are not to be used shall be re- moved and replaced with standard curb, gutter and sidewalk as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file~-in the office of the City Engineer. 4.T'hat trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the off.ice of the Director of Public Works. 5. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from view, and ! the sound shall be buffered from adjacent residential homes. 6. That parking areas shall be lighted with down-lighting a maximum 6-f eet in height and shall be directed away from the property lines to protect the residential integrity of the area.; 7. Tt~at subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and spec~fications on file with the City of Anah'eim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2. B.~That Condition No. 1, above mentioned, shall be complied.with prior to the time that the~ Building Permit is issued or within a period of 180 days from date hereof, whichever occurs + first or such further time as the Commission or City Council may grant. ~ ~3. That Condition Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior ~ to finai building and zoning.inspections. , 10. That a 7-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the south property line within i 30 days after final action on subject petition, as stipulated ~o~y the petitiones. ~ 7'AE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is ai~sd aod PRO AT'1'EST: _ . _ /~T~~z~~_/ SECRETARy ANAHEIIi CI1Y PLANNING COMA[ISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTy OF ORANGE ) ^c, CITY OF ANAHEIM ) tbis 19t~ ~da~ of Sep`tember, ~],966. COMMISSION I, s'vr,ra Krebs, Secretpry of Me City'Pl~oatnQ Coa~oIa~Ion of the City of Aa~heim, do hereby cert3[y that the t"dreQoing recolution waa p~ssed end adepted at a meetln6 of ffie CIty Plannin` Commission of ffie City of Anaham, held on S ept emb er 11 ~ 1968 ~ at 2;pp o'dodc P.M., by the followina wte of tfie members thereof: AYES: COAQIISSIONERS: ~amp, Gauer, Herbst, Mungall, Rowland. ~ NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ~1one. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Allred. ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONFRSs Farano. IN IR1T~i8SS q'HER£OF, I h~ve hereunto set my hend this 19th day of S eptember, 1968. _L%2~`~i,~~ SECRETARY APIAHEIN CIT]t PLANNING CONlMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 269 C2.G - Z- xu `~~.'~'s = ^r.. +~.~• 7. . .. . . : .. ` ~ ?~'• .. . .. . ~ . e.. . . _ . . . . ~ .