PC 68-331^~^f;!~•i'ti.ww
I i/
~
....!_.__i-_~"~"_____...... . _.....'__~
~ ~
RESOLUTION N0, p~66-331
`...~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0.2025 BE APPROVED IN PART
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City oE Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Varience ftom
. PERALTA INVESTMENTS, 903 South Agate, Anaheim9 California 928Q4, Owner; JAMES HODGES, 903 South
Agate, Anah~;im, ~:alifornia 92804, Agent df certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim,
County of Orange, ~tate of California, described as Lot Noo 13 of Tract No~ 787
~:r; r'~e
; and
~~ WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hoid a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
November 18~ 1968~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by
lew and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.68, to hear and consider evidence for
and against said proposed varIance and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith;
and
: ~ WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study mede by itself and in its behalf, I
~ and efter due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following
' facts:
t ;
`';i ~ ~
1. That the petitioner requests e varience from the Anaheim MunicIpel Code aS follows, to permit develop-
ment of supject property with a 26-unit apartment complexs '
i '
,' SECTION 18,28 050(6-d) - Location of accessorv structures. (Abutting side property '
J' line in the re r 25 of the property permitted; abutting ;
! the side property line in the front 75 of the property '
.~ ~ propos ed) , •
~, -~j: ;
SEGTION 18.28.050(7-a) - Minimum distance bet~teen main buiidinas. (10 feet required;
5 f eet propos ed) ,
fr 1
~ SECTION 18.28.050(9-b~ - Distance of livinq units from a standard street~ (200 feet ~
~!i permitt ed; 260 f eet propos ed . i
~
•\i'~ SECTION 18~32.050(3) - Minimum lot coveraae (55 permitt?d; ~ proposed). ~
j SECT'ION 18 28 050(9-a) - Adeauate acca~a for Ci y ser..;~o „oti• i (~~~ access ~ f!
required; in~~~~ access proposed)•
2. ~'hat waiver of the minimum distance between main buildings9 Section 18.28.050(7-a) is !
hereby denied on the basis that the petitioner stipulated to compiiance with the R-3 Code re-
quirements.
.;, 3. That waiver of Section 18.32.050(9-b)~ Minimum lot cov~:rage, and Section 18,28.050(9-a),
_ } Adequate access for City Service vehicles is hereby denied on the basis that no hardship had
been proven or evidence presented that design and development of the proposed apartment complex '
: could not be accomplished within the requirements of the site development standards of the R-3,
; Multiple Family Residential, Zone; and that the Assistant Fire Chief stated that if peripheral
.~; drives were not proposed then a 54-foot diameter turning area would be necessary at the terminus
of a minimum 24-foot vehicular drive. ~
, 4. That waivers of the location of accessory structures and distance of living units from
a standard street are granted on the basis that other apartment development in this general
vicinity and other parts of the City have been permitted to develop with similar waivers, and
that this portion of the site development standards of the R-3 Code will be reviewed to deter- ! '~
mine whether an amendment is appropriate. ; ~
5. That the requested variance, as approved, is necessary for the preservation and enjoy- ? ~
ment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, '
- • and denied to the ro ert in g
i P P y question.
~
~R. {
'•1
.+~~ ~ ;~
.
~ . "y ~
s a
' ,
~` ~
- ..._:.;,,,, -.a - ,
.. . ~ . . ' . ~ . . . . . MS ~~.. ~. H....y
~ . . ~ . . • . . . . . _ . .. ..~ 5 ~ . . . .. ~ 7~
. . . .. . . . ° . ~ ~ 'a 1 ,
~ i / I
~ ':,':•. ~ F.'Mi.i..., .. . . . . ' I .
.. ..__.._. ..... ...__ ....~. ~
. x.~«u..rm.w.r.v.~w+.~a~o..m,:~ ..__' -
~_ ' _'_. _.. . _ . ... .
Y ` ~ ~ ~
r
f
~.
K ,:
{~ ;' 6. That the requested variance, as approved, will ^ot be materially detrimental to the
~: public welfare or injurious to the property or improvemerzts in such viciaity and zone in which
r the property is located.
[°_ 7. That one person appeared in opposition to the propered density~ since he had been
~.` .~• required to develop his property with the density originally approved at 18 dwel:ing units
~; per net residential acre, therefor e, the petitioner ~vas being granted a privilege not afforded
him at the time he developed.
, a
NOW, THEREI~R~, BE IT R~ESOLUED tliat the Anaheim Ci•ty Planning Commission does hereby
grant in part subject Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which are hFr eby
~ found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order
~`'"~~ J to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
~''z, 1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reciassification No.
~~ 53-64-62.
.~~,. ;. 2. That a 6-foot masonry wail shall be constructed along the west property linee
.1:::- 3. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from view,
_ E~r and the sound shali be byffered from adjacent residential homes.
4. That parking areas shall be lighted with dox~n-lighting a maximum 6-feet in height
` and shall be directed away from the property lines to protect the residential integrity of
''r~E the area.
~~~~ 5. That Condition Nos. 2, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to
``~ final building and zoning inspections.
1' 6. I'hat subject property shail be developed substantially in accordance with plans and
~ specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2; providec~ however,
,;; that the revised plans are reviewed and approved by the Development Services Department and
'.= shall be in accordance with the R-3 Code requirements except as specifically ~vaived in the
granting of this petition.
,'
~
~ THE FOREGOING RFSOLUI'ION is signed and approved by me this 27th day of November, 1968.
i-
•i:
_;; ,
.;
i,
CHAIRMAN NAHEIM CITY PLANNING OJMMISSION
-. ~ :.
:, ~
' ~' ATTESTs
i:
; ; ~G~
~~ SECRETARY ANAHEI CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
1 SI'ATE OF CALIFnRNIA )
``"~{ ~ ~UNTY OF ORANGE
r'~ ) ss.
,~ CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City
_ Pianning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on November 18, 1968, at 2:00 0'clock P.M.,
;~ by the follow.ing vote of the members thr~=ofe
AYES: ;OP+~AISSIONF~Ss Allred, Camp, Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Mungall.
• NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
;r ABSENT: ~MMISSIONFAS: Rowland.
I,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 27th day of November, 1968.
~ L~~~G~~~~'
SECREI'ARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNZNG COMMISSION
`