Loading...
PC 68-62,.~ ~~ ,, ~ PC68-62 RgSpt,lJ'f10N NO. A R6SOLUTI~N OF THE CIT'Y PLANl1IIIG COODnSSSON OF TFiE C!1Y OF ANAF1E01 RLCOI~IENDCN(1 1'O THE C1TY CWl1CII. OF 'l71E CI'TY OF A1tAHE0i 'f71A'i' PE'f'[Tl~I FOR RECLASS[1*ECA17Olt NO. 67-68-59 HE DISAPPqtOVED ~4lgREAS, t~e City Plonnin~ Canmiarloe ot t1~ City ot Aa~heim did r~ceive ~ verifled Pke~^ ~aR fornia d~ ~ NiR. AND MRS. WAYI~E R. JON6, 2~29 East Lincoln Avenue, , 92806, Owners; TARIQ tii. SHAMMA AND DONN GILMORE, 914 East Katella, Anaheim, California 928U`i Agentr of certain real property situated in the Ci.ty of Anaheim, County of Orange, Siate of Califo•rnia, described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and referred to herein as though set forth in full ~~ ' qHEREAS~ tM Cfty PlaninQ C•oo.is~lo~ dld bld ~ p~blie I~wrfs6 ~t tA~ City fLdl ie du ~ity ot /1~oMNa ~ March 11, 1968 ~t 2:00 o'cioe-c P.C. ootls~o a3 edd DoNi~ b~ad°s hwias b~ea Arlr Riv~ ~° ~+4~itOd ~' , wit6 t6s pro-idoa~ d W N~~-Mw Ilddpal Cod~. CS~pt~r 10.72. b bNr aed eoaeid~r ~ law and ia ~ceoed~e~ •~md~ak~ (in8lap a~dr«.wa~oe~"aticaa ~ etid~wes tu ~ed apin~t wd p~opoa~d rmelmddetiaa ad to inw+tldst ' in conn~ctioa N»rewit~: ~nd RHEREA~, add Goa~B~d~oa. ~lnr ds~ ~~°~ iavesti~tion, r~d ~t~~dP sad~ Dy itsolf ~ad ia ib br trl[. ~od sker iw ee~a8desaRloa d rq ~-1~so~ od e~oa~s °[i~e°d et aaia ~a~io~, dosa 6e~ ~nd dbroi~ t~+ fedlevi~ laeta: a~~~~~ ~~~~c~ibwd Peo~wty 60~ ef~ R-1, One Family 1. Thet t9e patiMona Pe~o~s Residential, Zone to the C-0, Commercial Office, Zone to establish a commercial-professional office use of two existing residential strucLures~ 2. That the prooosed reclassification, if approved, does not warrant an amendment to ~ the General Plan at the oresent time; however, its relationship to the General Plan symbol ~ wi11 be considered at the next annual review. recedent for those ` 3. That the psoposed reclassification would set an undesir.able p ~': residential lots fronting on Lincoln Avenue, both to the east and west, ior similar commercial use requests of the residential homes, and would be deleterious to the residentia uses established to the north and east. 4. That subject property is within one o: a number of areas considered for commzrcial conversion potential in the residential front-on study recently adoptTd~ bjithalonanvith I~ Commission and City Council, which study did recort:mend that subje..t p p Y 9 , t other parcels in the immediate area should be retained for residential uses. j; 5. That if subject property and other adjacent parceis are converted to commerciai ~` uses, increased traffic would creat^ burdens which would decrease the utility of the ~ existing circulation facilities. 6. That there are 17 separate aress including approximately 176 homes throughout the City which were determined in the front-on siudy to be appropriate for conversion from residential homes to commercial purposes, and establishment of the proposed use in those areas should be encouraged. ~ ~ RD i* :~ 1 R~'; . ' "S~. ~.. ~_ /I~' -1- ..~. - •~.-_~.' .. _.._ ~W+rv~ ~~"~ ~: C ...IKP..1~ . ;~ % ` ~ 1 .{ ~~. ~~~~::'.. ~ I •~ i ~ ,d o-i qI ~ I :~ '~= +~' " - ;~E5tCq ~. '. . . . . . . . 'r . . . :~ ~ tA ~:w~ ~~:FE~ axzfl i~~f?~ H~r"E 30:~~~ hu~zbgud anl! m~.fcs~~~+}~ofrs4 . ~ uuii ''sta4 ! ~ ~ ~~`.~,~~~: : . _ , ~, .. . . . f: .... _ ~. . - :__ .. . . _ . ._ .. . s~ ... ._ . - :he la~d roferred to in tliis re ~' " porl is in the slate of Cali(ornia, counly q! O;anqo • ' ti x~~ ~:~s.s~~~~ +a~ ~h•~ ~I~~:i~~e~~ q~:~.~~~: u2' ~k~~ ~~~~~^I~~r~~~ ~~w~*: G~~: ~r,.~3 ~h:.° ~ ,' " ^ `*~,.~~~ €~uE~~ ~;» oP ~i+v ~i:~r ~ ° ~~r.e~~ Qa~.~.~::a: a~' Sra~~L'1~7 X?e ~~~^:~ra::w?~ ~3 ~ ~ v l~ ~,w,bf'r;~ ~{? 1:',~~~D 27k L::~ RL.~e7:~ 5~:i .nCi..12 ~;'c^..>'2:3~ I?4 :,•~L^.~'~a R:':~*.~ :}12 •• ~• ~"~.v'v. Ci~ cA..Y'.LL~'3~:.Ap t3s :a?'s3K11 C7 ; ks~;t~ I°4~:5'J?'.~.2t~ :l:l Y}OS~fi 53 ; ~.:.'"..~~~ F~.~~a r:.*oaz4?n oY a„~Q tlrereua Cc:u-~~yp ~a~er~.w~:~ en s ~ t..4e.:~W t a ~ . 7 1 ~ ~, u~ ~B. ~ w'"~:°.ws•~,',~~ a~ gcs~.e:~ b~2r ~ an tih~ Eau~. F., f~D y~rn M~ .~,~ ~'n y '~ ]/y.~cx~!~ c~~' ~'~,c/~~C ~3~. ~ 1 r~w~sr~ '~ S!Iu.JwG w.i 4i3~ ~iti~i.y~ .~4Q•`4tJM .Lil Y~~ ~,0 ~"`C+^~'~ ~'1J t~.t~A~ "i:7 r:~.r'.:i~.'.~~a~n~.^.i :i~i i-..;;~;ua ~r:U~~R*~5~ OP. ~3d d~uie~ Co^~u:°~'yy t~°5~42~L :ICa~4;i~t ug° ~~~' 3 49 F:":t~" ';~4sn~~ ~~a: S'z~r~ t~a !3w^x~~~~C acrnda o.~ F~a:.~ a~ As~S.~Y `~~~a`~~.v'~:3r~ '••.' i•a..^v'~3Cu'i ~~.2.L'~i2~1 $~b 53.0 .~i~u ~'~'r !~j.Qi1gp ~'iiZ.~yy~.~.0'S'~'.~D ~'~.L~fl O$' fi.Fi~d i~i y~'. ? V-°i;} ;=': y~°"'3~3 ~'~sat ~o ~ro ~~ 2~.~,~ oP ~la~ UOi~Vti~i'Sw~S~ C~LEi ~YF~irT oY ~'sic~ ~n~ ~i:~ ~' ` ~QUnit:.nucx.* j ~ ..,.~t an-. . // j'{~ f/ ~r!. „'~. ~ . . ~ ~ . . . ~~~1.'vi_i~.l l. :`i~~~ C~.~..J,._.C%..U.'~ , / .. • • ~ ~ P li6 A R lA r. 9~67) -•- ~ . . ~ . . .. , t .'_ _ ' t .... . . . . ' ~ . . . . . : . _ . t ':. . ~:._ ~: . . . . : • ~ . . ' . . ~ . . . t . . . . .._~ .~__' ( ~ :a'.. , . . ' ' . . ' , C:i~ . . .'_' ' . . . . . . . i . . _ . ~ ~ ~ . . . ~ - ~ . . . . . . t .1. e ti ~~'oA ~.~:n t.r",S u~?t" ~ ~~~ r 4 ~ ~ r. ~ ~ . .; . .y~ A :e i . ~ a ~: f x ~ i i ~ ~ !' . . .a... e2::+4t` re t ~ p r:a ! . K t ~ ~ ~ -~, 4r~~' a~ i~...t..h ar i.i.`~.w,r'~ R ~. 'v '~'t + 1 vC• ~ ~tr f • ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ '~1 :+~t: > . v t F ~t ~'«[~ 47 .~`a. ~ ~ a. ~ 4 .\. ' ~ . .. ' <. ~ t ~ ,~ t:l. +~ ~t`2? u.. i :,~1'S'~%g7 %it; • y . ti<„R^~ya ~,f, ~, Aa~>r.~..ya';A; ~:/3~ HiYZx.MV i'~~~~`:s.'.~vl~~~~~' ~ :•~ • ~' ' ~ ' '3.I.. r. 4;.F Yr.~'i :'rw~.':n13t':'.~'.~{i f"f+`i+'- tn VJ ~~ r . ~ ~ .. .r.,d ,~k,~ ...~ Jn i1:Y ~ a i:.wr, c.~i'~~ ~3. ~i~i'3 ~^:)'sy~;. ~ ~ .r i . .D 1 s 6:i~ ."..'CSNi~S '.C u9FC3 G+iay:~~S~' 't ~„CFWs tt'~` i':".^ ` ~ t _r ~ ~ ~ :~~~+,~~a~.:':1~ ~~.aZi~.~ ~."3 t3~` ~"~ 'B ? e .+.~ :~..ty r . , . " ~ f.a .^~r:r+.`i~:~3" ?~:~2? ~`'G~i~4 .~,~~$ ~:.'i:~YSc;•:: ~;.~.'"~is d; s> c : ~ „ . . - ~ ~'IS r~~..,Re~ ::"~~u~a~.~. Q"~ k~~ t L0~ T C;'yri ~.Cii ~.:'`.{«LyfL:,"vrt~#t~~~~~j ~*a7 +.~'.•y 7 . . . r-. T~-~ id'`f i. 9 :1 ~y,'. ~»~ t1LS"S'M ~.'~.'m~',.na i~rS^'J ~'.r',::~.i'~G ~n t~. s r . .. ; ~~ . < c.y..,~~ L.~~s t`S'.~1t~o~.~d X'~t8+rb p'~, e. ,n y ~ ~S:' p~` ., w:.~ ~ . . "f . W'~~'L~.aY.4 'rwP. 'n uL ~a)iaL A ~ 'Y i C"'~M tti' it ~ ' i ~.~ .: ~ ~ ~ ' ~:J'I 'YNQ a~ . s t~.~~ ~ F~iwi~,.d~m 4~ft1...,F3m..u.~~Z?l3 S3~ ~°E~i.x~~r :. . . .. ., ... . _ . :...... .:... ._ ,,. _ . . .-.. ... .___ ~ : .._ ` _. . .. _.... ._... . ... ~.., •. -. • ... --,~..«- w~.~.na~-r.~, ^.~. . ~-_~ _~... ".~.~.~.:,~c.:.„,r.-~.~,~, .-' _' .. ~ . +~xt_±.. ' i=,.ti`e`~.'' . . i . . ,~ _, s 'i • f(:~ N01V, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby recommend :;j to the City Council of the City of Anaheim tha[ subject Petition for Reclassification be denied on the basis of the •'~ Y aforementioned findings. j j .5 ~1 THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and app~oved by me this 21st day o: March, 1°68, ' ~i ~ j. ~ - ,l'( ~,. ' ~NAIRh1AN ANAFIEI,Ii CITY PLA\\ING~COl1UISSION r ATTEST: ~S ~~ -Sr~//7,//_-y' ~ i u'.iC~o ~ j SECRETARY ANAHEIM CiTY PLANNING COMhIISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ,r~ ; COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. i =~ CITY OF ANAHEIM ) j;; I~ Ann Krebs, Ser.retary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fore- going resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission ofthe City of Anaheim, held on j~; March 11, 1968, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the follo~•~ing vote af the members thereof: ~ AYES: COh1h1ISSIONERS: Allred, Gauer, Herbst, A1unga1l, Rowl~~d, Camp. NOES: COh1MiSSIONERS: None. ~ ,;z ABSENT: COh7A1ISSIONERS: Farano. * IN NITNESS 1VHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 21st day of Alarch, 1968. ~;1 ! <`~ I ';; ~ ;~ ~~~~J ~~.rtc ~;~~ ;'< SECRETARY ANAHEIA9 CITY PLANNING COM61ISSION 9 ~ ~~ RESOLUTION N0. 62 ~ Rz_p 2 ,i~ ~ =1 i'~~ ~ ~ ~'I'; 7 ~~ ~~ I :`'~ -t .~'~ ' ._.. .._..__.. .__ ._. _ _..._.._._... . ..._.- ~, ._ . ___..-_. .__-_ . : ;- --~'. ~ I - _ - ._ .... "' . . .. !~. .. * ~ : ' , + + ~ - ' " \ _n