PC 68-79,~~y
~~i,: l ^~F ~
;~~; ~
~~ :
'p;,
t;;;;;,.
''` PC68-79
RESOLUTION N0.
,/ .
'i'., A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF TNE CITY OF ANAHEIM
~~ RECOMMCNDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF HF~ CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
``" PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 6~"08-62
' BE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Reclassifica-
tionfrom G. K. CONSTRUCTION CAMPAh1', 811 South Euclid Street, Anaheim, California 92802, Owner;
TOM KEY, 811 South Euclid Street, Anaheim, California 92802, Agent of certain real property
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as Lc~ iJos.
1 thru 11 inclusive of Tract No, 3326
~
, and
' WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
~ March 25, 1968~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of said public hearin havin been dul
law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Ch pter 13.72, to hear and consider4ev ence
- for and against said proposed reclassification end to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself end in its behalf, and
after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. Thet the petitioner proposes a reclassification of the above described property from the R-1, Gne Family
Residential, Zone to the C-0, Commercial Office, Zone to establish a commercial professional
office comolex on subject property.
2. That the prooosed reclassification is in conformance with the General P;an.
3. That the proposed recl~:ssification of subject property is necessary and/or desirable for the orderly end pro-
per developnsent of the community.
4. That the oroposed reclessificetion of subject property does properly relate to the zones and their permitted
uses locally estublished in close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally estab-
lished throughout the community.
5. That the proposed reclassifir_ation of subject property requires the dedicatiar and
improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulation Element of the General Plan,
due to the anticipated increase in traff'ic which will be generated by the intensification or
1 and us e.
6. That the petitioner stipulated to removal of the existing residential structures on
subject propert~.
7, Tfiat six persons appeared in opposition to subject petition.
~
R-A _ 1_
:~.
~
~ ~ -
_ n.
;~-
r;.s ~:
t„~~ •
?~:., NOW, TREREFORE, HE xT RE`S~OLVED th~t the Anaheim City Pl~nning Comniesion does hereby recommend
' to the City Council of the City of Ananeim that ~ubJect Petition for ~2eclaasiHcation be approved and, by eo doing,
,`'~? thet Tltle 18-Zoning of the Aneheim Municipal Code be ~mended to ezclude the ebove described property from the
R-1, One Family Residential, Zone and to inco•rporate said described property into th'e C-0,
Co:~mercial Office, Zone, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary
': prerequisite to the proposed use of subject property in order to preserve the safety and general
welfare of th2 Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
~i:; 1. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of A~aheim a strip of iand
53 feet in wi.dth from the centerline of the street alono Euclid Street, for street :videning
.
purposes.
2. That trasn storage aseas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file
with the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to final building inspection.
3. That a reversion to acreage be filed on the subject property which shall incluile
abandonment of Pliobe Place.
~,~ 4. T}-,at any air-conditioning iacilities proposed shall be prooerly shielded from view,
~~~ and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent residential homes.
~'. 5. That parking areas shall be lighted with downlighting a maximum 6-feet in height and
;.;;:; shall be directed away from the property lines tc protect the residential integrity of tha area.
~5}' 6. That Condition Nos. 1 and 3, above mentioned, shall be com lied wi
~ p th within a
~ of 180 days from the date hereof', or such further time as the City Council may grant, p~iod
~r~~ ?. That Condition Nos. 4 and 5, above mentioned, shall be com lied with ~
;~ building and zoning inspections. p piior o final
,j 8. That all access rights to the alley at the northeast corner of Lot No. 1 of Tract ~o.
~ 3326, shall ne dedi~.ated to the City of Anaheim.
;,
''.; THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 4th day oF April, 1968,
i '
~ ~
_ .z ,~
i
J ~
; HAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
i ATTEST:
C~ {/~~~ ~~ /~~(~
~ L_ ~ r ~l~ / ~ C.~~('r.i~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss,
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
held on March 25, 1968~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof;
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Farano, Gauer, Nerbst, Mungall, Rowland, Camp.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Non e.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Allred.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF', I have hereunto set my hand this 4th day of April, 1968.
~ '
~
~ *
RESOLUTION NO. 79
R2-A
:
~~ ~~~~.
~ , ~. ; ~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-2-
.. ., . ,
~
h