PC 68-83;,,,;,.,...
1:,:
~~,~,~,,;,
'~^s.`: .
r,.,.~~:
~
~ ~:.: ~
.:w,t;
.,,,,;;:;:
h:i.:; -
~j:'.;.'. `.
I:i;,','
;,
-;~ ;
:r: :
¢,.
1 :i
"~1
,~.
:~, -
~a ~
A
~ ~~
~e:.
RESOLU7'ION N0. P~68-83
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNIIYG COMIISSION OF THE CITY OF AIQA!{Eml
RECOE4111ENDIIVG T01HE CRY COUNCIL OF ?HE CCfY OR ANAA~pI 'If{AT
PETI1"ION FOR RECLASS[FICATION NO. 67-68-35 BE DLSAPPRpVEp
reclass{EREAS,ion onyce~tain1realtproperty~situatedmin1thenCitytofaP.naheim~~County,of O~ange,
State of California, described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and referred to herein as
though set forth in full
; ood
NHEREAS, the City Pl~nnfn` Commisaion did hold a public eeaioa ~c che ciry x.~l ;,, ~e c~ey or ~nn.b.im
on March 25, 1968,ot 7:00 o'clock P.li. notice of said public hsala~ h~,in~ ye~ ~Jq ~yy~ « rpairod (y
-aw and ln ~cco+d~nc~ with tde provlda~e ot the M~heim Ilanldpd Code~ Chaptet 1a.72, to hm~t ~nd coaaider
wideace for aed aa~Inst aaid PeoPceed cecl~aificatim ~nd to investig~ta and m~4e ttediop ~nd eeco~ossndation^
in caenection therevlf6; ~nd
NHEItEAS, ^aId Commission; ~fter due inspectioa, ieveeti~atien, and study made by itsel[ ~nd ia ite be-
half, and aher due conaideretloe of all evidence sad reports offered ot said hearing, does Eiad and determine the
followin~ facts:
1. Thetthe City Councii proposas ~ reclassifir.ation of the above described oroperty
from the R-A, Agricultural, Zone to the C-1, General Commercial, Zone.
2. That the prope*ty is not suited for the full range C-1, Zone uses, because of
its close proximity to the residential uses to the west and north.
3. That even though the "Front-On-Study" recommended C-0 uses for those homes
fronting on the north side of South Street, all the homes are now being used for
residential purposes and the owners have indicated it is there i.ntent to reside in these
homes for a number of years, provided that undesirable uses are prohibited for subject
property.
4. That if tl. City Council deems a change in zone is ne~ded, consideration should
be given to the development of the property for C-0, p-1~ R~-: ,,:_ R-~ Zone us~,z~, ,.,,,~., ~,~,~~i
act as a transition between the heavier commercial uses established along the State.College
Boulevard frontage to the east of subject property; furthermore, if any more intense use
is approved, access should be limited to one 30-foot drive placed directly across from the
drive of the residence to the north, in order to eliminate lights from vehicles leaving
the subject ~rooerty shinina into the windows of these residences.
5. That althou~h :ne Coi~^~;ssion re;auested that p;~~~ of development shoulc~ b~ sub-
mitted, due to the possible deleterious effect general comrnercial uses might have on the
residential integrity o: the area, the plans were withdrawn before they could be reviewed
bY the Commission.
o. That two persons,vahoe.e homes are directly affected by any change in zone, appeared
in opposition.
RD
.,, . .,
-1-
, -. ^
~ , . .
~
~
#
~
.
~i ~
. ` ~ ~ • _ r `1 ~
~
~ • ~ , .. ..; f ;~ `
.
~
~~ ~
. I i
~ric r
,. . ~
i .....'. ~ .. .~~~.. I C ;~~, ~ ... r~v~, ...~.~i. ~ ~ . ~ ~
•
.• ~.. r.LC Ct.uC •'~ I ~~ ~•••,~ ~~:T ~;1 I'f.i t I
r
P~ .
•
'
S/^
ld~ ~.. icn.y
~i4 Ptlrit:[ve.'~ F.~,J., j .
I~
.. . .. '
.
.
,,..~:wt.~
~ailtcrnta ~ . ~y
-~_~_ J • ~: „~~r_ -_ :'i: .
' i ,~ '
.
• :m!'r%i ; :r.
„ ',~;;,;::=: ~
=
` • ~
,
..:; ,.
.,
I
l
~
r
,.,'"
^i`'~r,_-
~ ' ~~.: 5,-5~: ~'
, u. . ..~.~~.~~.~I'C.i:~ir ~_ = ?
.
i
~ ' Ar~~~l.llti.t~'.~.lr.Y/~..i~T~~i~5~.r.r. •
'
'
' ~
~ 1
i i
.
_. - .• l~'a'~IIlS. i~CCC1 '
i ( „ ~ ... ~»
„
~
p4 ~ i
{ I
,
I
1'filt A 5'AI.II,11~1.3: ~.1~\SIUI'l1ATl~~~.
~~~~ip1 rf .Lid~ L IrcrtL~<.~L.n.IcJ~e~l,
' ,
1 I~
`~
I i JS':1 J. i:°4Ylt:~ J8, nn0 J::kBis N. I;e.R%lIt:~ hue~ani nnd ulfe ~ ~ I
i
~
nr~rby 1:111;ii~c~ i„
~.
i
~ C,:I.V:lCf °!,fi i I:1' ~'ItSd':II q? l`tniClli~ a corporiUnn i ~
I
~Irtlollowin~Je~rr~I.Jr•~I.. . , nlh< ..:tf e: ~~:
'
I ~ ~
f.~,,, i ~~f
..~'~---n..._
..'......~. V_~_~!=( C.Itte=_: uz per nLh:hed J.xcriplloo:
~ . •
,
•. ~!
51~::~. ~.o:ll•~ o: lat 3L ~~f i,:i.hcln Ertcn;ici~~ In l~c Cil; ci /u~V~~ic~ Co:,~,l•~ o: Gr.,,:.-
~ :l:J.u of Callfc+:nlr.
n: 3P
c:n~ oi a rz ~
,
.
a;, ut :piv:y n:.n. by tli:tl:~a iian_1 ur ~ N!.:;: in i~r;
~ o::lr.,: cf LL: Co~Sily RccorJcr uC Lo: A:,,ielc: r~4,~„ C,ttiw:~f:.
a w
•
•
~
:
,
..;
„
~:;~:~~~ f,
::~~.~•~~ !n iuoit 3 i:y^a 1(} ct ct,.~ enlillc~ ^LO.~l,:~,;ivlc; C~,:n1y ::
Ji, tl
li
'
C
~ ~
~
~
~
ip c
~ .
:c
:i=: n
o: ;cy ;;cr.orCcr ot ~ai4 Oranpc Cow~:y~ •ic.crlb. I a, folloc;:
~ .
:. ~ ~
n~f ?,;;~~•a)
.~° .
.
~•,iim:n:, ac ~~ pafn0 on Uic con:cr :In. ot F,
~ M, ' ~th Strcct~ c~1d poln: L.!n,r, liic norl'n.
~
cc:ucr oi Urc lan; tc:•r:
W to Janc, i
E ~ 1 '~
+~l
\
,
,,
..
.~n:!n by dttd record.d J:tut:cr .^Or ]y:ii f^
u,,,;: i.;u ~,~;~ in; o: o:n~~~t rn.,,u.; u,:r.~t t,o:u~ 1L~ 35~ ~,~~ 4-.~ ~:~e •„ ~
:•;Id e~nl
i
fccr
ll
:
'
"
' ~,r .
,
'~!~~
•
, e
cr
ce; ti~cr.ta So~:h 1
o~~
4~.~^
' \i ~
$ ~ ia:t.iG~.i> fecL pai•alicl vith ~ht i:c:.t :Ip~
~ o: .,~id 1,-.~; of I;cnrln lo Lhc ~CO1•thvc:trily lln: of Lhc 1
C d
l
G
' iil(~~
.
~~
ese~
6
tl [n 1~~,. u~i,~ ~~ i,
~
~~:Ili~.a fi. Crcbcl~ rr. ~~ ~.;corded Jut3' J~ 19»6 in Cooe IG6) P
~ge 3
'! o: J
° ~° ~
CJ
'
V,.
,
.
Cfiela:
~ fi<cot~z; lhcncc SoutL il~• ~>i
L$" 8c;t i11,~0 :ceG nlonn ;a1u nortfive„cr~y linc [o i•~
p c:ld v;;t llu: ct Lhc land of }:ccvtn} tt~cnco };oith 15' S5~ 2y" Y~
i
o
~ Nr,~~
~!V; •
~~~
'
c.6 l
~
,($ t~~~ ~o ~n~ c
~ W:nC ef LcpJnnlnp. A
t ~2
E%GS~ thTt ortion thcreof thSC Ilcs wlth(n th~ iln¢a ot :wi
th 5t
t
r ~?~~ ~zd~
~
rcc
~ na :
~ctd r,:.p.
hv.n un
, SnfL 1.m1 tu tnel~_7cd vlthln tha orer, nho•Jn on a cap ; ~70~7, ~ r -"--~---
?9 ot liecoc~
ot Sucv.ya~ !n the offtca of Uu CqwCy Rceorde
~y:~`9'%
~
f
j
~
r o
m~i f~6
,
`'"/f'$ .~
,' '
h
-• : i
a
~
:
i
f'v ~ ~ ~~ .~~~~•,06~ .~~~ . ~ .
~., S~ ti,~ i'; ;
.
. , ~. J
n, I,
~~j' ~F.O~ •f'
n ~
. . ~; . .. . n
.
.-i~'~ t^ ~` ~ ~
G
o~
~
• J
' I ~ ~
.
~ F~~
~ ~~
f
~
a
. ..
ni : : : . . . ~ . ~<,~ ~'" °',,~bz~' ~ .
.~EC,CP, ~S
0
.
~ ;
.
~ „
,
..__~.
~ g_ 3$ . S~ez~-~£°~ , .
~..~~. . ... ,.. . .
~ ,
i .
. ~ '
_ ~ ~
~2`:;~=`
yr.'.~?~ . . .
~ .
, ~
i'i!' .
'F~, ~.r
I
r;~ \
~,;,^
;;.,
f,
1
...._ ... `,
,I ~,~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the pnaheim City Planning Commission does hereby recommend
~` f to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that subject Petition for Reclassification be denied on the basis of the
~ aforementioned findings.
~ Y~
~%
'!~~ THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and a y
~~ „-~ pproved b me this 4th day of April, 1968.
k ,'-'r
~ ~
.~
(' I 4
~ :~ .~/ -.~~
~ ,'.' ~ C AIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLAN NG COMM SSION
~' ;: ~ ATTEST:
. ~
t~.
~. ~ ~
A~. _:~ (/(/~-L s~t // I" LC, ~ 4?/
il~~ ;; SECRETARY ANAHEIn9 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-:i
;; STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
; ~ COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
,,~ CITY OF ANAHEIht )
I~ Ann f~rebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
~ going resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
i i~ MarCh 25~ 1968, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
,,
AYES: CONMISSIONERS: Allred, Gauer, Herbst, Mungall, Rowland, Camp.
' NOES: COMMISS[ONERS: Farano.
"` ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None.
: ~ ~ _;~
~ ~,. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have heieunto set my hand this 4th day of April~ 1968.
-;.
~ :
,, i .:;
~~ ~~~ ;
~' ~~
; • ;~ (r' (~~YL; i ~~ ~~Zc', C<.=~/
;~
" `~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~ RESOLUTION N0. 83 •
i "i R2-D
. -2-
~ I~
~ i
_..__.~ . ~
~
~