PC 68-85~.:~4~;' ~~
~*`'
, '
` RESOLUTION N0, p'~be~'85
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COh1MIS3ION OF THE CITI' OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 1~58 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission oE the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Pe;ition for Variance from
!:iAR:'INDqNIEL, INCORPORATED, P,O, Box i0i0: Santa Ana, California 9"',1, G,~ner; DA~\IEL C, ~fyEf1
P.O. Pox 10101 Santa Ana, California 92717, qgf:nt o: certain real oroperty situated in the City
of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Calir"ornia, oescribed as tn~t portion of Lot li of the
i ~~liles Rancho, as shovan on a Map recorded in Book ~
Orange County. Beyinning at a point in the Eastezlypl9~ ~ or Miscellaneous Maos, :~rOTdS of
t~e h'ortheast corner; thence ~^reste_1 i„ 17~ of said Lot il, 05~08 ieeL South of
So;ath para11e1 with the Easterl iT, Y' ~'a_~aL~l to t.he 1~orth line of said Lo±, i0o feet; thence
`" along said Southerly line io thr Southeastacorner of saidSlothe~ly line thereof; thence Easterly
~, ~ erly line of saio lot to th: ooint o.° oeginning, exceotir.g th~~North 1~5.o7rfeet;~alsohex~sti~o
~
the South 306.21 feet.
' ; and
s'. WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
'~ Marc:h ~5, 1968, at~: JO o'dork P.M., notice of said public heating having been duly given as required b
+ law andin accordance with the provisions of the Anahrim 1lunicipal Code, Chapter 18.68, to hear and consider evidence for
~F and against said proposed variance and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith•
~ and
R`HEREAS, said Commission, after due ~nspection, inve~tiqation, and study made by itself and in its behalf,
:~ and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and detertnine the following
; ~.~ facts:
;3
;,
~%a 1. That the petitioner requests a variance from the Anaheim Municipal Code, as foilo;vs, in orde: tp
~:~ ~ermit *he developm~.^.t o.~ a 16-ur.i~, t~r,~o-;~ory apartrr,ent comol ,
=,c or, subject pronerty:
•~:`ti SECTIO' 18 '~8 0~~0(3)
} -~'~i~nimum fioor area o: owellina units. (P. minimum of
`" i ~0~ sauare feet r2quired 57C f
i F, 9 sauare _ eet to 02?_____Sa_~zr;_
;; 3 ~~~t prooosed).
_- SECCIO;' 18.2fs.J5p(5~~) - t.;a•r,imum bui~dinn and stru~:tural neioht ?:
~ mitations.
`; (Si~!~~A-;tory const:u~;tion re uired ~,vhen r'
( ; tz~ oc , __~. ~+ ~ithin 150
any siny_= amily r=sidential zone;
~'onstiv~ ta•~o-story
Cion proposed),
: ~ S~,~CI'I0;•1 18.28.050 b-b-•2 ,
- i,ti^imuin buildinp setback. ~ p
~-5 eet reouired adjacent
;~ to t^~estrrly property line; a~•foot setback prorosed),
; SECTIpDJ 1g,3_ 2.pg~(2) -. Buiidi: : site area oer dwellinp unit.
~E _BL required; 92G square feet proposed)1200~re
j. 2. rhat the petition~r is requesting a 20ib reduction in the minimum f
I::=~16 reduc'.ion in tne minimum builoiny site are- loor a*ea, and a
+ deszrabl~ livir.g environment. a Per divellina unit, ~n~hich ~vould create a un-
I ?. Pnat tna pe ,.~_. .
I titioner is re,auestiny t~;:o-story construction ll~ithin 150 feet of single-
famiiv r~;identia: uses, a ~r.aive= : • ; .
;. That >> .._ : ~ .. -
~ ~ ~: a~ -d !;v t~ :. :'orr.mi ss.io~. o: ~i i?
th~ reyu;st r'or •~~aiver or rha r:uir;=d buildiny site area ~~vould reduce ihe
cr*:o~r.t o~ rr~r~atior, :e_s.;.~e ar~- '
~ apartments. o which is need~d for a desiraule living =mrironment for
j 5. That a similar variancr request fo:• ts~:o-=tory apartments on s
IJ ~:~ni~d by the Planniny Cornmission and Cii Co~.:nci; in :dovemoer, UbJ2`t propeTty was
I~ o. That there ere no ex.r.ctionai or ex±raordinary r.ircumstan~ces or conditions appli~,able
;i to tha prooerty involved or to the intrnded use of' tne property that do not apply generally ±o
~ th~ property or c,ass of use in tne same vi:inity and zone.
~ ~• rhat 4 persons apoeared, repres~nti.ng 15 ersons
~. in oppositior. to subject oetition, p prESent in the Council Chamber, all
i
! V1-D.
•,.. ~
-1-
; .•' ~""~+~'~ .r,~e~~-- ~_.~.- . ~- ..
_, ^
~
` n
~.;
~t~.
;;'~
;:.;
~_;;I ~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby deny subject ~
'~ Petition for Variance on the basis of the aforementioned findings.
i
~
~ THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by :ne this 4th day of April 1968,
~ y
vi
v~ / ~~
~:; HAIRMAN ANAHGIM CITY PL ,NNING MMISSION
'~ '~ ATTEST:
:E
'~
-,R
~:~"~~ _ _ ! %~ ~iilZ /!~C ~i1"/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COhiMISSION
" STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
~ ~ `~k COUNTY OF ORANGE ` ss.
i ~r, CITY OF ANANEIM !
~, : .~ ;
I, Ann Krebs, ~
Y..
~'' Secretaq ~f the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby ceRify that the fore- ~
; going resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission ofthe City of Anaheim, held on ~
i' ~ ~~~; MarCh 25, 1968 ~ at 2:00 o'clock p,h1., by the fo;lowing vote o[ the members thereof: '
~ I
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Ailred, Farano, Gauer, Herbst, hiungall, Rowland, Camp. ~
~'' NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ~~'one. ~
i.
• ~ ~
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None.
I
i: :;° IN L9ITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 4th day of Apri1~ 1968,
~~ ~ ?:;
~' I L~
' I .•~ C~1~C~ ; ,- - ~/ i,'
E; ,''.r~ .1'Z.<: v -~
~ ';~~ SGCRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~ ^ '~ RESOLUTION N0. ~5
' '~~i V2-D
~ :e -2-
_.....,,
~
~ ~ ,
M1
~\