PC 69-107r
RESOLUTION N0. ~69-107
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMTSSION OF THE CITY OF ANA}!EIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE HO. 2088 BC kP°ROVEG
WHEREAS, the City plenning Commiasion o( the City of Aneheim did receive n verified Petition for Veriance from
MUTUAL fiENEFIT LIFE INSURANCE COMpqNy, gqbp }yii;hirP Boulevazd, Suite 420, Beverly Hills,
California 90212, p~•,,ner; R. V. INDUSI'RIFS, I~JCC~;~PORATED, 2220 East Cerritos Avenue, Anaheim,
92806, Agent of certain real property situate~i in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State
of California, described in Er.hibit "A" att~ct;ed hereto and referred to herein as though set
forth in full.
; end
WHEREAS, the Cily plenning Commission did hold a public hearing et the City Nall in the City of Anaheim on
May 19~ 1969, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public heering hevin been du~
B y given ae required by
lew end in ecc~~~ce with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.68, to hear and cansider evidence for
and against seid proposed varience and to investigete and make findings and recommendotions in connection therewith;
and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investiqation, and study made by itself and in lts behalf,
and efter due consideration of ell evidence and reports oftered at said hearing, does tind end detecmine the following
facts:
1. Thet the petitioner requests e veriance from the qneheim Municipel Code as : ol lovus, to permi t outdoor
welding and storaye activities on subj?ct property:
a. SECTION 18~j,040 - Permitted outdoor uses in the M-1 Zone.
uses to be conducted wholly within a building requrired;iout~l``"oor
door welding facility proposed?.
b. SECTIGP~, 1$.52.060(3-b) - Enclosure of outdoor uses. ~6-foot, solid rt~asunry v,~all re-
quired; chainlink fence proposed).
2. That there are er.ceptional or ex.traordinary ci• :umstances or cor.ditions anplicable
to tt;e property involved or to the intended use of the pr~per.ty that do not ap~:y gen~~rally
to the property or cl~ssof use in the same vicinity and zone.
3. That the requested variance is necessary fur the prescrvation an-i enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other properEy in the same vicini:y and zone, ~nd
denied to the property in question.
4, That the requested variance will not be matFr.~11y datiimental to the public •..:lfar~~
or injurious to the property or improvements in such vic.inity an~J zone in whir,h the pioperty
is located.
5. That the petitioner ;tipulated to screening the outdoor welding iacility from :~iew
from Cer.-.itos Nvenue.
with a66-foot masonr~rwall~mafibesviewedtin theesame SibhtCas~~roperty without t_~ing enciosed
employees, and wouldYnot present a deleterious a 1 q Par'r,ing of the ver,icles by
plant to the north, whir.h has outdoor storaqe ofPStcelndr~m5ucnclosedev~ithr, just ~~~~ha~in~ ii~l;
fence.
Vl-
-1-
~
~'
i'
:?
1'.i
i
,.,'
i
~
I .
TQ i55t ;7_68)
, ' i
. T.~~ Ro 2~ ~~
Record Owner Guarontee ~ ~
~~~~~,
Title Insurance and Trust Cornpany .,~,~ ,,.
1''ce $ ~ `~ a i
Strcet stddress or othcr rcf. ~~,•
a California wrporation, d ~Iu1- ua 1 nnn~ rt <. - a ~
ocs hcreby guarantce , ~~
~ T n G i--~n~' P.~..n
... `~. z!"1(:USLT'~.c?.,
~~~~~ ;:~.3i: CC'r'T'~.~03
.:'ay.'1C-'i;:~ .,^~ l,iOn1?_^
--,.~:':: .i0i.ir':°~ .:l~.lU
~~•ho, by rcrpii~yling this limitcd guarantcc agrecs lhnf lhc liability of d~c company hcrcundcr shall not
_ ca~cc~cd S100.Q0 aiid shall L•e limited to actual loss if less dian said amount, tfiat, :ts app~~n from an exnm-
ination of its lot books or propcrty inciir.es, thc appnrent record owncr of thc 1;tnd hcreirt described is
'-'-=-- ~:u'_'li~":J I3?:;~rIm LIIis I~ISli13Ai~dCE,COtiPAWY of ]Ier~ar.lc, ~re;,t Jersey,
a .:o •r Jers2~ corporaL•ion.
, . r:~,.. ca; ~ t~. cnr.• ~ 1,
"~-I rs.znen^a Yc:cb;. y~ti.r:
i•~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~•:'T1 ~^ •.nr __ • • -r.. ~...r.-:•:r ,^'i". nt 7 Hoy •"'~[. rr,
`^~ _ .... ~f ~ ~~~"~ ~~ : av.zrk~ .
. . ~ ~~ - . • . ~ ~ ., iMf."~ ttl C!iT l'~Ty b: ~~ ~
f..'~~ _ ~ .. , . .. .. t , .I'~ . C:~:l.°l" .~.1~ ... ~.:7'~:C~ Q~
i; -'.. ...._.•~~.-. . ~ . . .Y~I~~~I~I~`~6J ~{V~^.r~ ~~~v _
_~~~~" ~ ~~..~
~.. ~ "t ~ ~pr,t~ ;~ "~p . '
~r~ ~. ~.,. ..~ . -. ..a::^. .,~ ,:~ll- ~~ ~i
1 .c.. . .. ~ '~ ' ~~~r..r.~~0i~t~~ar , i .
~....... _... l
1
. '' ~~nt ~~( . . , n; ;:r~t':r :
, 1 . . ' Il`:4~ ' .:yj..~y, 1
. .. .. . ' ~ " I't .. '1 ~.~ I~.~, ~
7 1 ~~' ' 1 ,~'` '~ ... '
~ • . . . . , i ±n i ~ n~ , n •~a•~ .- - --
~ . . . ' . . 1- .~ ~ ''
.,, ..... r ~ ~: ',•-.`c_~ p:s . :n~ n •:~• i~~,r'':~
r t ~l. . .
.: . . . ^ ' "~. 5094. rL`5 i i . ~
• ' ~ ~~:r . ~ ~, ' . ^ ~ ~~~~~~,~ ..~Yl~a..: `, r~ ~> '^ .
. ~ ~. - ~. 1 tr . . . " t ~ '.i r t• '}nu c" `~' • ~ ,
~ i.~ ~. . . . r7 i ~ ~ '~, ~~ n~ o'~ ~f~ cC~f ,` ~ , .
' . n . . . _ . ~~ T'..-.i•~~ ~l~~~ ,
. ~ ' . ' ' ~ • ~ .' 1.~, . .
. ' " / . ~ ~ ~~:.~1 :','P:~.....~y ~ ~.
. .. 1 1 ,~ '. i ~
,,. t Y ~ ~ i::'~ BF° ~G' .
. . ..;r , ~_. I,cz~ ,..,'1 r . :'1~7~ t.ee co
Lhe ^oucL~•ar~torlv line o! t.ne lnnd d~ar.rlPUd fn th~ ~~ 'V '~
- ~^.ed to ~.:Ifl~• ir.~,cuv.e;'¢»i Co~~~ny~ rncorMA Jun• ~ 1. .
^', 1.^,.^,a Sr ncc4 wcl Pa^,a :1 0: :crtde. P~r.^rda of
' L^:: ~•lcc ~c~un:7 Cn.i'r.~n:ai [hencn :o~z^.b 70" 1~!' . ' '
:1" , n~r .~;~ ..~~C:-a.:i~tnTly 11^e~ 177.6[ laot ~
' :~ th, ,... ,. C: :r-1f~;n-. ~.
. ~
i••'•. r'...•• .• ~P ~•.. ..... ,..._: O: t:1S0 GCTiVI:•fiL'ICO~ G: OuCA ~
i`
- n--~•~*rnc~~ c:irli b: ac~clun:.vaY.! icaeuced .h•~ tf.e s:eorC::lea af
tr?° ^:: ~: ~^~•Z~ h^.~-:J en?~i'rsy ar0 ogrn¢f to gny th~ ur^sid
~~ ~, ~ prir.::;~nl Pn:~.;:,~a w:id e:l :4~i2nr~::~ Aun uprn thc notc accurnC '
i
~ ~ Dy t?~a D~nG of Tr~pt t^ri~L•~i.+44*^ r~ea;ic:ia0, nr,Q to I;old C.;^antmro ~
. . ~crror. ~ a..- ..__..
.:La .M ,~._- , , ...._ .~~y.....,. _. .,...
. / .-~,.._._.."°. .. "~+n~+~:~::.
C
_`t
NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby grant s~'.ject
Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the pro-
posed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens oE the City of
Anaheim.
'.. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the C~ty of Anaheim a strip of
land that varies from 45 feet to 50 feet in width from the existing centerline af the street,
as shown on the precise alignment for Cerritos Avenue, for street widening purposes.
the City ofaAnaheim~along~Cerritos1Avenue,lsuch asecurbs and gutters,nsidewal.ksqustreetts of
grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as
required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on
file in the office of the City Engineer; and that a bond in an amount and iorm satisfac~ory
to the City of knaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said
engineering requirements.
3. That ihe owner of subject property shall install street lighting along Cerri.tos
Avenue as required by the Director of Fu41ic Utilities and in accordance with standa*d plaqs
and specifications on file in the office of the Director o{ Public Utilities, and that a bond
in an amount and form satisfactory to the City~of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to
guarantee the installation of said streei lighting.
A. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file
with the office of ±he Director of Public Works.
5. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required ~nd oetermined to be necessary by
the Chief of the Fire Department.
6. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from view.
7. That any metal building siructures erected on subject property shall conform to the
metal building standards a= prescribed by City Counci: Policy No. 526.
8. That Condition Ros. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, shall be completed prior to the
commencement of any outdoor uses as req~,ested in this variance.
9. That the outdoor weldir.g area shall be screened from view from Cerritos Avenue,
as stipulated to by the petitioner.
THE FOREGOJNG RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this ?_9th day oY May, 1969.
ATTEST:
" ~'~ _ i~
:~ ~
CHAIRMAIY NAFIEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
- ~~1~L~?~Z-~_/ )jZC L~C~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLAN(VING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Kr2bs, Secretary of the City P(anning Cc-amission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
going resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission ofthe City of Anaheim, held on
May 19, 1969, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the menibers thereof:
AYF..S: COMMISSIONFRS: Gauer, Herbst, Rowland, Thom, Allred.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Farano.
ABSENT: COh1MISSIONERS: Camp.
I~~ WITINESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 29th day Of May, 1969.
RESOLUTION NO. 107
V2-G
~ ~2 ~ C ''`~/~`LG,~~~
SEC't2ETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLP.NNING COMMISSION
-2-
~