PC 69-112~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. pC69-112 ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMIS~;~~I OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 68-'69-91 BE APpROVED
WFiEREAS, the City Planning Commiseion of the City of Aneheim did receive e verified Petition for Reclaseifice-
tionfrom HERMAtv L. LENZ, ET AL, 930 South State College Boulevard, Anaheim, California 92806,
Owner; NATHAN SHAPELL, 8857 West Olympic Boulevard, Beverly Hills, California 90211, Agent of
certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
~escribed in ~ The northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of the northwest
quarter and the v+est 11.00 feet of the northcast quarter of the
southeast r,uarter o: the north~vest quarter and the southeast
_' quarter of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter and
the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of the northwest
.._ quarter of Section 13 township 4 south~ range 10 west, in the '
Rancho San Juan Cajon De Santa Ana, City of Anaheim, county of ~
Orange, State of California, as per map recorded in book 51 page
10 of miscellaneous maps~ in the office of the county recorder
of said county.
- ...... _-..~,..-...i-.r.ro.~---~---~-- - ---~-+..~.~"~-----•_•.~--._.
; and
WHEREAS, the Clty Plenning Commiesiort did hold a public hearing at the City Hell in the City of Aneheim un
May 19, 19b9~ at 7:3(b'clock P.M. notice of said public hearin havin been dul
law aed in accordance with the pravisions of the Meheim Municipel Code, Ch pter 18.72, to henr n~d onside rev dence
Eor end ageinst spid ptopoaed reclessificetion and to investigate and make findings and recommendetions in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commisaion, after due inspectlon, investigetion, end study mede by itself end in its behalE, end
eftet due conalde:atian of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. Thet the petitioner proposea e reclaeeificotion of the ebove described property from the R-A, P.gricultu*al,
Zone to the R-2•-5000, One Family, Zone.
2. That the proposed reclassification is not in conformance with the Housing Element
of the Anaheim General Plan - 1969.
;
3. Thet the proposed re~lasai;icetion o[ aubject property is necessary end/or desireble for the orderly and pro-
per development of the community.
4. Thet the ptoposed reclassiElcation of subject property does properly relate to the zones and their permitted
u~es locally eatablished in close pcoximity to subject property and to the zones end their permitted usee generelly esteb-
lIshed throughout the community.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property requires the dedication
and improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulation Element of the
General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be generated by the
intensif'ication of land use, a
6. That seven persons appeared representing cwelve persons present all in oppositior.
to subject petition.
R-A
-1-
~, n.
r! ' N~W~ 1'H£REFORE, BE ~ c~,:aOL~JED thot the Maheim City plaenin` C~ mmission doea hereby recomm~end
~' ~ to the City Council of the City of M~hmtm th~t ~ubJecF PetiUon for Reclaa~iflcation be approved rnd, by ao do!ng,
that Title 1&ZoninQ of tPie An~heim Mueicip~l Code be ~meod~d to exclude the ~6ove deaxdbed property irom the
;; R-A, Agricultural, Zone and to incorporate said described prope_ty into the R-2-5000, One
i F~mily, Zone, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary pre-
requisite to the proposed use of subject property in order to preserve the safety and general
.~~ welfare of the Citizens of the Ci~y of Anaheim.
; 1. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim park and
! recreation fees of $125 for each dwelling unit, as required by City Council resolution,
j which shall be used for park and recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at the time
! the Building Permit is issued.
~ 2. That a Final Tract Map of subject property be approved by the City Council and
' recorded in the office of the Orange County Re~order.
i:
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epproved by me this 29th day of May, 1969.
,~
~~~-~-~~ 2r~ ~.~~.~~/
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
A'LTEST:
~ ~~1~i~2~%i7L~ -~~i
SECRETARY nriiui~iM C11'Y PLANN'ING COMNISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss,
CITY OF ANAHEIM }
I~ Ann Krebs ~ Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Meheim, do hereby certify thet
ffie foregoing resolution was passed end adopted nt x meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
' held on May 19' 1969~ at ~~3Cb~~~ock P.M., by the followiug vote nf the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONEI2S: Gauer, Herbst, Thom Allred.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Farano, Rowland.
ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Camp.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hend this 29th day of May, 1969.
SCCRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. 112
R2-A
-Z-
J
~ {`
~ y.
~
~ ~~
~