PC 69-158RESOLUTION N0. PC69-158
A RESOLCITYNCOUNCIL OFTTHELCITYNOFCANAHEIMOTHOEFADOPTIONYOFFAREAHDEVELOPMENTf~PLAN jJ
N0. 103, ~XHIBIT "B" FS A LOGICAL MEANS OF PROVIDING DEVELOPMEIJT AP1U
N CIRCULATION PATTERN FOR SAID PROPERTIES~ TI{ERETO
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission considered at public hearing on June 30, 1969
a petition for reclassification to the R-2, tvfultiple Family Residential, Zone onc parcel
ef land situated in the center of seven large R-A parcels located on the south si~e of
Orangewood Avenue west of Ninth Street; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined that an area development plan should be
prepared to determine the most feasible means of developing all seven R-A parcels, and
providing a circulation pattern acceptable to the City of Anaheim; and
WHEREAS, the Planr~ing Commission set for public hearing consideration o:` Area
Devel.opment Plan No. 103; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall
in the City of A~afieim on July 28, 1969, at 2:00 0'clock P.PA., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions
of the Anaheim N~unicipal Cc~de, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed
area development. plan, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in conn~ction
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Comrnission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by
itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered
at said hearing, does Find and determine the following facts:
1. That ti~e study area consists of seven R-A parcels having a i;otal frontage
on Ora~gewood Avenue of 851 feet and approximate maximum depths of 300 feet.
2. That five persons own the seven lots depicted in the area development plan.
~ 3. That cliscussions with owners of five of the seven parcels indicate they plan
~. to re:ain their homes for residential purposes for at least four or five
~ years.
I:
{ 4. That two alternatives of development were considered, namely multiple-family
; and single-family residential development, either of which could be accomp.lished
,.~~ ,
V;.~ `. on a lot by lot basis ot by some form of land assembly.
~,:~ ~' 5. That Exhibit "A" depicts land assembly for multiple family residential de~~lop-
~ ment with numerous alternatives available, such as a garden-type apaii,-c^c
~~i ~¢ development~ or a four-plex subdivision, permitting each lot to be developed
C as pr.oposed under Reclassi:ication No. 68-69-99, however., this would result
~ in sE:ven separate access points to Orangewood Avenue and would be undesriable
r;: ~ from the standpoint of traffic conflicts.
~ E 6. That Exhibit "R" proposes a 19-lot single-family subdiv.'ision which would not
S require a variance, and provides interior circulation wl~ile having one access
point to Orangewood Avenue, which may be developed in two phases; that Exh~bit
~ ~I "C" proposes a 28-lot R-2, 5000 single family subdivision, with four "side-on"
i~ I lots which would require a variance and projects two access points to Orangewood
Aver.ue; and that Exhibit "D" proposes development of two parcels at a time,
<il ~ developing 20 R-1 lots six of which would be "side-on" lots requiring a
~ iari.ance and would also project four access points to Orangewood Avenue, in-
'i cluding Ninth Street, each approximately 200 feet from each other.
7. Tha't two property owners, having title to 4 parcels in the study ^rea, and
~. two persons representing adjoining property owners appeared urgi~g consideration
; of maintaining single family residential development for the stu.:y area.
~
~ .
.
, ~~ ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does 2dopt
and does hereby recommend to the City Council of the City of Anaheim the adoption of Area
Development Plan No. 103, Exhibit "B" as the most logical manner in which to develop
properties under consideration as they pertain to the adjoining residential environmer.t,
:'' and as a means of providing circulation for these lots upon ultimate development, without
:`: creating any additional traffic hazards.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and appr,oved by me this 7t day of August, 1969.
I '
CF'~AI AN ANAHEI CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTES T:
~~~ - /
SECRETARY ANAHEIM ITY PLANNING ~MMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Comission of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foreooing resolution was passed a~d adopted at a meeting of the
City Planning Commission of the Cit~ of Anaheim, heid on July 28, 1969, at 2:00 U'clock
P.h1., by the follo~ving vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONFRS: Camp, Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Thom, Rowland.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Allred.
IN WITNESS WIIEREOF, I have hereunto 9et my hand this 7~h day of August, 1969.
~~ ~
_//L ~-2 ~ ~Z./ c-~L~-.a~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
e
C
v~
r:
k -
4. ~ Res. No. 158
~
~ ,
i' `
,~ ~~
!
r. '
r