PC 69-159~~p~ ~. PC69-159
-- ,>-.~.~s
A B~OLUTIaII OR '~'!!~ Cd7Y PLAl111Q0~ ~'~!~ Q~ '13RQ ~91f ~0 AMAM~Si
~OO~IDOIiO TO 71l~ ~TfY C01~1C.~. 0!r ~ C~7Y O/ p~ANl~ 7HAT
lSTITI~1 P'0~ RtCi.AA~1CA'i'ION N0. 6-----9~,99 i~ Dd~APl1~D1fED
i
~i
~;
t4~
~
~, ~,
~;
~ •
e~ ~~
~ i
'i
~
` _ ..
.,
" -- --
~116R~~iS„ t6~ Citp *le~ala~ Caasl~sloe ot tke Cltr ot A~mbcAe ~lid aoeleo o reelttai Pstitlo~ br R~-
eftqri~cMlom Goe FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY, P. 0. Box 269, Orange, California 92669,
Owner; WILLIAM E. SWANK, 105 Town and Country, Orange, California 9266°, Agent of certain real
property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as
the East 132.20 feet of the 'Nest 257.37 feet of the North 324.5 feet of the Northeast quarter
of the Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 28, in Township4 S outh, Range 10
West, San Bernardino Base and M~ridian, in said Orange County.
: ~nd
^lI~RElAf, tiie Clty Plw~t CoadsMw ~N M1~ ~~M1e ~we1a~ u t~a Clq IWl h ems C~ty of Mah~im
~ July 28, 1969, ~t 2:b ~'ciocf r.d, e~t~,~ ~~~k
IM ~ ~O ODC~M'Mr~ R'I~ f~0 /~O'-t~iw ~I ~IM AY~lI~ ~ ~A~.``M ~ ~~ Y f~~MA ~
N~O~ I/f ~ ~ G~' `^•TR U.T~~ M A0~ O~ OOAYIA~t
~~ sW /wpwe~ nel~~i8e~tlo~ rd t~ 1n~sd~.ito so~~i~ lf~aP ~ir~oo~~~ud~tims
~a ~cis~ t~aeelM; oed
11Hi~lEAS, •tld Co~issic~, eh~ is I~cty~, ~w. d~~, o~ ~ fta![ od in ita Dw
rai[, ..a .a4 a.. oon.i+.t~tla. me ail ..w..a~ ..r w~e~e, .~..o ~1 ..ie ti..~l.~, a... rW ..a ~.eern;rte cne
bilosi~R (~cts:
1. Tl~at tQs Ntktlon~r peoposM s erel~ssltic~tio~ o[ t!s do~e M~eriMd ~wp~wly /rw tl~ R_ q
ZONE to the R-2, MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, 7_ONE to establish a 10-u~AGRsingleRAL
story apartment complex on subject property.
2. That tile sr,ope of the proposed reclassification, if appro~red, does not warrant
an amendment to the General Plan at the present time, however, its relationship
to the General Plan symbol will be considered at the next review.
3. That the proposed reclassification cf subject property is not necessGry and/or
desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community.
4• That the proposed reclassification of subject property does not properly relate
to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proximi.ty to
subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally estab-
lished throughout the community.
5. That the proposed reclassification is not in conformance with the land use
policies established for this area as stated on the Anaheim General Plan, and
there has been no evidence submitted which would indicate that higher density
residen~cial uses should be permitted.
6. That the approval of the proposed reclassification would set an undesirable
precedent for the remai^ing R-A parcels by projecting multiple family residential
development in an area completely surrounded by single family homes.
~. That a majority of the adjoining property owners of the large R-A parcels have
indicated their desire to retain their properties for single family residential
us e.
8. That land assembly and development in accordance with Area Development Plan No. 103,
Exhibit "B", is the most logical manner in which to develop subject property.
~:~
~
t:'
i
• ~)
9. I'hat fou~ persons representing adjoining prcpes~,y to t}~e north, south, east,
and west, appeared urging consideration of single family i•esidential development :o:
subject property and denial of the propo=ed reclassifica'-ion.
fdOW~ THEREFnRE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hereby recommend to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that subject Petition for
Heclassification be denied on the basis of the aforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed a d a roved
y•,me thi~ 7th da of August, 1969.
I
~
CHAIRM ~ ANA EIM CITY PLANNING COh1h1I5S IODI
ATTES T:
/~~~.-l.~.i~j~ ,~~~~
; SEGRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
- STAI'E OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORAIdGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Ar,aheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a r,eeting of
the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on July 2r~, 196?, at 2:00 P,~q,,
by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYBS: COMMISSIONERS: Campt Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Thom, Rowland.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT; CAMMISSIONERS: All.red.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 7th day of August, 1969.
; ~ I ~ ; -l: -Z ,z . ~ .r~
~_.
r, S ECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~'. RESOLUTION N0, 159
~' ..
r
' R2-D
r: -2-
- ~~.
-- ~ . „ . *. _.~'
~ , . . . .