PC 69-166~
RESOLUTION NO.
P'%b ;_ , ~~~
9
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE C1TY OF ANAHEiM
RECOMMENDWG TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHBIIIQ TNAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 6°- ~~-4 BL APPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commiseion of thc City of Anehnim did recelve ~ vttlfied petition for Reclassifice-
Hon from ALFRED SEEHUSEN, 12302 Eurlid, Garden Grove, California 92640, O~vner; DAVID A'ADDO;;,
111 Nort}~ Western, Anaheim, California 92801, Agent of certain real property situated in tf,~
City of Anaheim, Cou~ty of Orange, State of California, desr.ribed as the East 110.00 reet o~
the West 536.00 feet of the ;dorth 396.00 feet of the i~orthwest Quarter of the blorthr.est Quarter
of the Northeas* Quarter of Section 23, Tow.-nship 4 5outh, Ranoe ]1 West in the~ Ran~ho Los
Coyotes, as per map recorded in Book 51 Page 11 of Miscellaneous h9aps, in ti;e oifice of the
County Recorder of said County.
; end
WHEREAS, the Ctty Plenning Commission did hold e publtc hearing at the City Hall In the City of Anahcim on
July 28, 1969, at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of seid ublic herrin havln been dul
law and in accordence with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Ch pter la 72, to hear end on iderevi ence
for end against seid proposed reclassification end to investigete end m~ka f3ndin~s pad ~commendetions in connection
therewith; end
WHEREAS, seid Commiaeion, efter due inspection, invcstigation, end study m~de by itself and in its behel(, end
aEter due coneideretion of e11 evidence and ¢eports offered at seid henrin`, doen Hnd ~nd determine the following facts:
ZQNE to ~e tR°_~'et1MULTIPLE~FNMILYcRES1DENTIAL~thZ~abov~~d~e~+tablPs~h ~ 5~ unhetRaparGnentLconAle~
on subject property.
2. That the proposed reclassification is in conforrnance with the proposed Anaheim
General Plan ~- 1969, and ]and uses surroundinq said property.
3. That the proposed reclessificetion of subject property is necessUy ~nd/or desireble [or the orderly end pro-
per development of the community.
~ 4. Thet the proposed reclessificetion of subject property does properly relate to the zones and their permitted
uses locelly eatebllshed in close proximity to subject proFerty end to the zones ood their permitted uses generally estab-
ltahed throughout the communlty.
5. That the proposed reclass?.fication oF subject property does not require dcdication,
but does require imp*ovemert of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulation Elernent
of the General Plan, due to the articipated increase in traffic which will be gene:ated by
the intensification of land use.
R-A
-1-
a
~
RESOLUTION NO. r~~'" ~'- ~ ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COM1dI5SIGN OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIht ?yAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 69`'~-•4 HE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the CIty Plennin~; Commisaion of the City of Maheim did reeelve a ~~titied Petition for Reclassifica-
Uonfrom ALFRED SEEl~IUSEN, ]2362 Euclid, Garden Grove, California 92640, ~vner; DP.VID ~!ADDOX,
111 North Western, Ar.aheim, California 92801, Agent of certain rea] property situated in the
City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as the 'cast 110.00 :=et of
the West 536.00 feet of the fJorth 39E~.00 feet of the iJorthwest Quarter of tne IVorthv:est Quarter
of the Northeast Quarter oi Sectior. 23, To~~nship 4 South, RanoF 11 West in the Ran~ho Los
Coyotes, es per map recorded in Book 51 Page 11 of Miscellaneous Maps, in t;e oifi,:e o: the
County Recorder of ,aid Couniy.
; end
WHEREAS, the Ctty Planning Commission did hold e public headnQ rt the Clty Hall in the City of Anaheim on
July 28, 1969, at 2:00 o'r,lock P.M. notice of said ublic heurin ~vvin been dul
lew and in eceordence with the provisions ot the Meheim Municipel Code, Ch~pd. la 72, to heur and con ide9e~ dence
for and ageinst said proposed reclessiFication and ta investigate end make [inQin`e ~xd ~commmdetions in connection
therewIth; end
r WFlEREAS, sald Commiasion, after due inspection, inveatigotlon, and atudy mrde by itaelE and in its behelf, er,d
_ sfter due conaIdetation of all evidmce and reports ofiered at said heorin~, doe~ find ~nd determine the Eollowing fects:
3
~ ZONE to thetRepethlULTIPLE~F'tiMILY~RESID ~JTIAL,thZONtVtoeestablPS~a~45m~hetRapartmentLco~nAl~x
on subject property,
2. That the proposed reclassification is in conformance U~ith the proposed Anaheim
General Plan •- 1969, and land uses surrounding said property.
3, That the pcopoaed reclessificetion of aubject property is necess~ry and/ot desireble for the orderly and pro-
per development of the community.
• 4. Thet the propoaed reclassificetion of subject property does pmperly relale to the zones end their permitted
uses locally esteblished in cloae proximity to subject property end to the zonea and lheir permitted uses genereily esteb-
liehed throughout the community.
5. That the p:oposed =erlassification of subject property does not require dedication,
but do~s require irnprovernent of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulation clement
of the General Plan, due to the articipated increase in traffic which will be generated bv
the intensification of land use. .
R-A
_ ._.-,,
-1-
~
~
~
~,.. ,
~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT tc.iSOLVED that the nnah~i;u C; 1
to the City Coyncil of the City of Anaheim that uubject E~et;liun~io~ i:oclruxlf'tcetiun,btJ~.,~o'y hereby recommend
that Title 1&Zoning of the Aneheim Municipal Code be ermend~! to e~clede the above desc`r~ibed p perty;romothe
R-A, Agricultural, Zone and to incorporate s~id d~si;^~}'1BfI ~yOL`?ZF'J ~nin -~~-.-, p,_; n~.,'.-
Family Residential, Zone, unon the follow:n cond:tion=_ ~ '~~~~1`1F"l~'~
~ 9 ~vrich are !~ereb~, round to bE ; nec..
~ essary prerequisite to the proposed use of sub,iect prooerty in order to nies.r~,e ;h~: ;a~~,t~
and general welfare of the Citizens of tre Ci ty uE r,r~..i~ci~r.
1. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anahri•r alony Ball Road, inciuding
preparation of improvement plans and installation of all improvsments, su~h as curbs and gutters
sidewalks, street grading and paving, prainaqe facilities. or otner appurtcnant v~ork, shall
be complied with as required by the City Engineer and in accordanc~ ti~~ith standard plans and
specifications on file in the office of ~he City Engine~r, and ti:at a bond i~ an omount and
form satisfactory to the City of nn_=;a9m sholl be posted ~~~iti~ the City to ouarantee the
installation of the above mentioned require~~ents.
2. That the owner(s) of subject propercy shall pay io ti~,c City o: Mnan~im tne su~r~ of
$2.0~ per front foot along Ball Road, for s:reet lightiny purposes.
3. That the otvner(s) of subject property shall pa~ to Lhe City o'r Anai~eim the sum of
).5¢ per front foot along Bail Road, for tre: plantiny nurposes.
4. Tha•t trash storage areas shall he provided in ~crordance with approved nlans on .°ile
with the office of tne Director o: Public Worhs.
5. That fire hydrants shall be instzlled as rcyuirod ar~d dete.~~ined to bu n~cessary by
the Chief of the Fire Department.
6. That subject development shall be scrv~d by und~_rgrou;:;; vtiliti_s.
7. That a 6-foot masonry v~all shall be r.onstrucied aiong t:i~i E35t, r:est and south
property lines.
8, That any air-conditioning facilities propos~d s;~aji 1;~, ;,;o;,~,~y s!:i:i~~_d :rom viev;,
and the sound shall be buffered from adjar,ent resider,tza] hom~~;.
9. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, and 3, above mentioned, shal; be complieo ~:~ith w5thin
a period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such .urth~: tir:;, ~s t;,o Ci'y Council may qrant.
10, That Condition Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, above men'.ion~n s~.al; b~ coin~ lied ~,~ith ;;:ior
to final bui.lding and zoning inspections.
11. That the owners of subject nroperty shall p-r,~ ~c ~F,,, ~
tion fees as requireo by~ City Council u~solution o` J>>S i~: ~~. ~~~~ ~~~ ~'~I~ ~nd tECrea-
used for parl: and recreation purposes, said amount to Pji+~,,~;.d~~~t ~~e i"•it, rr~ich s!:a11 he
is issued. ~~ tl~~~ Bui ui~q !'rc.. ~ t
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me ~.liis ~t" ;la~ oi ,'is,:~is , 1~r.,,
r
CH IRMAN ANAHEIt11 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~~J-'"~-'i-'C..~~ / i1 L-< ~h~.~
SECRETARY ANAHE M CITY PL/1NNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
1~ Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Maheim, do hereby cedi(y lhat
the foregoing resolution was pessed cmd adopted nt a meeting o! the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
held on July 28, 1969, at 2:00 o'clock P.ht., by the following vote of the members thereo[;
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Camp, Gauer, Hcrbst, Thom, Rowland
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: T~one
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Farano
C~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend this /th day of Augus L, 1969.
7
`r:
r ~
~ ` G ~~ G2- ~; ~)52.~
~~%
,; ~ . SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CtlVI61tSSiON
* RESOLUTION NO. 166
,~ "~ I R2-A
-2-