PC 69-169~;is , `E
, I
RESOLUTION N0. ~~~'yV~~'~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING CQMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. :'1C~~ BE .~~'Fu'-''•'~= •
WHEREAS, the City P1annIne Commissfon oE the City of Anehelm dtd receIve a verified Petition for Verience from
HOItiARD P. F+~l~~~ 2122 West 3rd Street, Los Ange:ee, C~l:fornia 900~', p,.,~-,~_; r~lldP]IS UFUINE,
13648 Ventura ~oulevard, Sherman Oaks, California 91360, Agent of r.ertain real o:oper;y
situated in ihe City of Anaheim, County of t?ranne, State of C~lifozni~. desrribeu as the
South half vf the South I0.00 ar,res of the We~t ?O~Q~' a,.zes o` ~'-e r.~~: r.t~;~:s± o:,zrt.r- c{ the
I Northwest Quarter of Section 18, To~r,nship : Soutn, Ran~~ 1~ »IES~, ;^ t~-~ ~,~.~.•he Los "o~•ct~-s,
as per map recorded in Boo,c 51 Paqe 10 b,f Mis=elian?o.~s ~Aaas, in the orii:E o' the Countv
Recorder of said County. Er.cc~pt tee Ea~t 15C.~n fe.~t the~~oF, p.t;o P,.,H1;• th? lSes: ;o8~,~n
feet thereof. Said land is sho~~n~n on a Map ~iled in P.oo~: 19 Pa~~e ~4, of Par:-~:;s ;daps 3n ~he
; oifice of the County Reco*d~r of said Oranga Cour~±y.
t
WHEREAS, the Clty Planning Commieslon did hold o public headng et the City Hell in the City of Anaheim on
July ?_8~ 1969, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notlce of said public heering having bem duly given as required by
lew and in acooedance with the provisions ot the Anaheim Munfeipel Code, Chepter 18.68, to heor and conslder evldence for
end ogalnat said proposed vorience end to investi~ete end make tindinge end recommmdetlons in connection therewith;
end
WNEREAS, •~id Commieafon, after due inspection, investigetlon, end study madc by ltsel! end in !ta behalf,
and attec due considetation of all evldence and cepoRs et(ered at seid hearing, does find end determLu the (ollowing
fects:
1. That the petltioner requeats e vutance from the Anehelm Municipal Code :~: t r~ ~; ows , t o s s ta b 1 1 s h
a 66-ur.it 2-story apartment con,ple} or subfei t pro~:,~~: Cy;
~. SECTIC~' 1d.98.05Q(10••a) - Minimum numb~: o} ;e~u9r,:.,~ r,o,~~.I.F~ parkir~q
stails. (H3 covered stalls require~~ b6
covered stalls and 9a uncovered sta.ls p:oposed)
b, SECTIO(J 16.2R pgp (q.~h~ _ Maximurn distance of dwellino units fro~n a
standard street. (lNithin ;~00 feet re ~ul:ed;
fourteen units betNern ~UO and ;~~6 fPet
pruposed;
c. SECTION lA~?9,~igp(6~~~1 -Loc,tion of ,~ccessorv buiidinqs.
( Ac,r.essory
buildings abuttiny the i•etir ~~ of s9de
p-operty ;ines p~~rmit~?dg cazports ;,butting
s.~;e proNerty l;nr. within th~ f*_or~t /5~
prUposedj -~-
{ d. SECTION '.8.3^-~~;Q(?~ Minimum h~~iidinc site ~rea ~~~,~.,,~e~Yinq unit.
` I f;?0~ sauare fe~L zAquir?d; i_i'~{ snu~,re fec~t
' P"oP~,;^~)
2. That waive^s l~-a, 1-b, -,n~3 i•-c, above mentlun~•~~, m+y be consider~d te hnica: ir,
nature b~sed urnn iecent;y pJOf'o;"u ,,rnenJir::nts to th~: site deveiopment st~ncier•7s
of the mu?tiple :.iniily r_e;d~~r~t1,;1 .:ones, .,hi~1: the Ca~u~is:,ion adoptea and
-r recommend~d to thr ;ity Cour,•.i; !oz ,doptior.
~ ~ 3. That waive: ,--;~ abov~~ rer,Cion~ ;, is f~e*~:by dnniPd o~
::~ic thit 'he n~aeting
; ~ of this ~,ai~~-r •.,o:~i~l ..<1_ -,n ;.n:~-sir~tlu prer,;lent te im:;-,r v~.~':v~:- fo:
,~ rUt:;r~ R••'i rr . .~t~ , ,, : ,
d v ~ ~n~ :•~. ~ t: _i-~m! in<~ >r„~.
"'~ oi.h~•r e r~ioP~: o! i a~ur,en :c; F °` f-'~" ~o.c y yr:~nted tp
F :.p.--•.s; :~r~ Lt,'.' ~ ~ lt i Li::. ,,~nibE: O; f.h~
,r total pro::os~;~l ,. ~ . ,~ : : ~,. , .
~Y ,o ° o-.. ,r. ~.o ~o ; ~ r~ }
~ ~ ~rr.~ pe: a~h~e,i.~.~ unt~ i: „ • o- ....,inq s:~._
. ~ ~ . . ~ C/t.~i. ~ . ~ 'i.
~
.
f ,. _ . _._ _ , ,
4~.. ., ..... .. . _. ._ . .
:~.'' !
" t -
)
4. That there are excepti.onal or extraorciina_y :;i.~currstani.es or cu,~itiors app;;-_~i;1~
to the property involved or to the intended us~ o.` ths ~repezty -.:= .~n~ro;r;
do not apply genexalJ.y to the proper~;~ or class or use ~.^ i.he san= vi•`•;ty -.:;~1
; zone.
~i
5. That ti-,e requested ~;ari2nca as approv~o is r.ec~:.sa_y ror ti:- ~~es~r~~~tion a:id
, enjoyment of a substantial prope.rty z9cP~t ncssrsc-e.;; ~,~
same vicinity and zone, and denied ~o th2 r.u ~it in~ J''Ei ~~G~~~~y in the
P p"' y :~u~stior,~
6. That the requested v3riance as approveo wiil not be mat~ri~il}~ d~tx•imsntai to the
public welfare or i~ijuri.ous to the ~roperty or i~roro~~eme~ts 5n sucn vi~ini~y Ur,d
zone in which the property is located.
NOW, THEREFpRE~ BE IT RhSOLVF.U tha: th~ Ar::~heim r,i~.y P1an~:..:~u ,^~,,;,,,, ~•,.•
rant in ~-~-o^ does hc^coy
~~ 9 part su`~ject Petition for Variar:cey upon Lhe :o"o;~iina c:er,:~i'.ions v~hi-.h are hereby
; found to be a nece;,ary prerequisite to the propo=_=d us~ of nc~ ,•.h;e;;~ p~ope_ty ir. o*_•ce., to
: preserve the safety and general welfarc of the Citi-ers of the Cit;• of An~ti~im.
1. That this varian~e is grant~o =ubje~:t to 'he ~o,,:p7.=±:ion cr Re.c:~~s, i-:~,+;
No. 69-70-3. - ._ on
~: 2. That subiect r,roperty shail be oeveloped ~t~bstanti~~!',,~ ir ,-,;.;-c~z ;:r.•:= e<•i~h
~~ plans and sper:ificati.ons on :ile :vith tFc Ci`y c: Ar,a'r~r-;r~., ;r,-,rl~e.d 5y,hitit
'; Nos. i, ?., and 3., F~rovided, harmver~ that t`~;_ m9nir*n_:,: i_,,.:idinr; eit~ area
;; per dwelling un3.t is in confarmance v~rith CoJc :c>> :i:~n~-~t~.
THE FOREGOI~G P,E50LUTlOh is signed a;~d a cved ~y -,,. t; is - tF, d. , or t,~c,u; ~, 190~~.
~ .~
_ Cf.Alit:l .'.n:~~_J.~". .,. _ . f~LA'.i,:iic C0~";1id:S5: .
? FlTT6T:
/ i /
L
~7 2 ti1-t ~~/
t SECRETARY ANAHEI CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
`
' STATE UF CALIFORNIA j
~UNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
i ; CII'Y OP ANAHEIM )
I:
certifynthatbthe foregoing~resolution wasnpassed~andsadopted ateaCmeetingAofhtheYCitynPlanning
Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on ,Tuly 2f3, 19ti9, at ?cU0 o'clock P.M., by the following
vote of the members thereofa
AY6Sz COMMISSIGNERSs Camp, Gauer, Herbst, Thom, Rowrland
NOES: COARv1ISSI0NER5: None
ABSENT: (:OMMISSIONERS: Al:red, Farano
~?i
IN WYTNESS WHEREOF~ I have herEUnto set my h~nd this 7th. day of August, 1969.
~~z~ ~-/ /~"Z~-_~.
SL-CRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CAMMISSION
' ~3ESOLUTIOi4 NC. 169
: ~;
k`.i '~ ~ V2-G
4 "~ ~
~ i
~
~
i~
~;
;~~
,~
"~ ~ -
:~
.:~.•-u;:
~ ,