PC 69-182RESOLUTION NO. ~'C69-182
A RESOLUTION OF TFPE CITY PLAHNING COtAMiSSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIIN
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. ~ 118 ~E GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commisaion of th~ City of M~heim dis! roceiv~ ~ vedfied Petltion for Wadance
from R, L~ WEIZLER, P. 0~ BOX 2216, Brookhurst Station, Anaheim, California 92804, Owner;
ANAHEIM FOREIGN CAR CENTER, INCORPORATED, 626 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheiin, California 92805,
Agent of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
California, described as Lot Nos. i and 2 of Tract No~ 373.
; and
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold • public herring ot th~ City H~11 io ihe CIty oS Maheim
on September 8, 1969, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of ~rld public he~da~ h~vin¢ been duly given as required
by law and in accordence with the pmvisions of the M~heim Muaicipel Code, Cheplat 1d.68, to hear and consider evi-
dence for a~d ageinst said pmposed varience and to inveatleote and m~Ice $ndln6~ ~nd tsoommsndotions in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, seid Commisaion, after due inspection, investiQation, and study eode by it~elf rnd in its behnlf,
end after due consideration of all evidence ond reports ofEercd ~t seid headn`, does ftnd ~nd dete~mine the following
Eacts:
I, 1. Thet the petitioner tequests a verience f¢om the Maheim Municipol Code as follows, to permit the
expansion of an existing automobile sales lot:
SECTION 18.44.010 - Permitted uses in the C-2 Zone.
P I ~
~~
1
~ A
~ "+t~
?'~ ~ ",
2. That there aze exceptional or extraordlnory circumstancer or conditlon~ ~ppllcable to the property involved
or to the intended use of the property thet do not apply ~merolly W tke property or e!w ot uae ia the same vicinity and
mne.
3. Thet the requested veriance is necessery Eor the preamvstlon and enjoyeent o[ ~ Qubstentiol property right
poesessed by other property in the same vicinity and son~, ond deniod tn t!t prop~rty in qnestioe,
4. That the requeated voriance will not be meterielly detrin~atrl to We public ~relfw or lnjurlous to the prop-
erty or improvements in such viciaity and mne in which the property is locat~d.
5. That the petitioner stipulated to dedicatinq access rights to Anaheim Bouievard
for the existing northerly accessway from subject properi:y, and to the repair of sidev;aiks
on 47ater St: _F,t.
Vl-G
-1.
~
h
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereb
Petition for Varianae, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a neccssary prerequisite to the r.
posed use of the sub'ect Y B~ent subject
Anaheim.
1 property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of
1. That the or~ner Of subject ro
10 feet in width, from the centerl~nepoftthehalleyeealongttheCaiieof Anaheim a st=ip oi lar.d
property line return at Anaheim Boulevard and Water Street.
~ 2. 1'hat the vehicular access rights te Anaheim Boulevard fromYthennortherlyoaccetlsway
shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim.
3. That t:ash storage areas shall be
with the office of the Director of Public WQr~sded in accordance with apnroved
, n• That the sidewalks shall be repaired along N'ater Street, as required bynthes~Ot rile
Engineer and in ac~ordance with standard lans and soecifications on fil?
~ the City Engineer. p y
"~~;' S• That :he owne; of sub ect in the office of
;-;~ per front foot along Anaheim Boulepardeand Water Stre~~ the City of Anaheim the sum of 15Q
i:'yr 6. That any air-•conditioning facilities proposeci ;hallrbeYee planting
' • ~. 1'hat an purposes.
y parking area lighting shall be li ~ P'OPe~lY shielded from view.
~. ~ in height and shall be directed away from the .
g,~ted with down-iightir,g a maximum 6-{eet
integrity of the area, prOPpr-Y lines to protect the residEn±ia]
`s~ 8. That landscaping shall be provided dn the site in accordznce with the C-1
;6,,, Development Standards.
~.x~ 9. That Condition P1os. ], 2, 3, 4, 5 6 ~ Site
~~~ with within a +,, and 8, above me~tioned, shall be conplied
- ~ period of 60 days from date he*eof,
;~ City Council may grant. or such further time as the Commiss'
10. That if and when the single-family residential structu:e c;resently iocated on~thA or
"~ eastern portion of subject property is removed,
;r~, developed in Code confo:mance regardine, Iandsca that portior, of the prooerty shall be
~''1 11. I'hat sub'Ac P-ng. surfacino, lighting, etc.
;~ J- t property shall be developed substantially in accuroancc with plans and
soecifications on .'iie ,,:ith th~ City of Anaheim, marY.ed Exhibit No. 1.
~
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved b
y me this 18th day of September, 1969.
C A(RMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COh1AfISSION
ATTEST:
.rx
~~ ~ ~~' z ~ ~ -L~/
~ / ' i
~ SECRFTARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
, STATE OF CAL.lFORNIA )
COUN7'Y OF OR.SNGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEli~7 ~
~
~ I~ A~~ Krebs, Secretary of the City Plannin
going resolution was nss g Commission of the City of qnaheim, do hereby cettify thot the (ote-
p ed ond adopted at a mectinq of the City P~anning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
September 8, 1969, at 2;00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
1,~ AYES: COh1MISSIONERS: Allred, Camn, Gaver, Herbst. Thom, Rowland.
~'f NOES: COAIMISSIONERS: fJone.
I ASSENT: COhfMISSiONERS: Farano.
I
' IN WITNESS l4'HfiREOF, I have hereunto set my ht+nd this 18th day Of Se
ptember, 1969.
~~/
L''~ "7~~ : C %~~
2 ~. .~~, ~.
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIDIG COh1MIS5I0N
RESOLUTION NO. 182
V2-G
-Z-
y
-- , ' _