PC 69-20~ ~
RESOLUTION NO. p~69-20
l A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSIOK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
~ THAT PETITION FOR VAFtIANCE NO. 2050 gE P.PPkOVED
:'
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City oE Anahelm did :ecelve a verifled Petition for Variance from
M. K. BORENSTFIN AND ALBERT GUDES, 944 Agate Street, Anaheim, California 92804, OWners of certain
real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State ef California, described
as Lot No. 19 of Tract No. 2062.
' ; and
' WHEREAS, the City Planninq Commission did hold e publia hearing et the City Hall in the City of Aneheim on
~f February 10, 1069, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearina having been dul
~'; lew and in accordance with the provisions of th~ Aneheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.68, to hear end cons der evidence or
i;;• and egalnst said proposed ~ariance and to inveatigete and make fIndings end tecommendations in connection therewith;
;i and
WHEREAS, said Commission, efter due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behelf,
and efter due conslderation of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following
fects:
1. That the petitioner requests a vatiance from the Anaheim Municipal Code as f ol lows, in order to
establish a 49-unit one and two-story apartment development:
SEGTION 18.28 0 0~7-b) - Minimum ~istanc betw en rallel walls o' buildinos. (48-
f~~t required; ?8-fg~t proposed between 1:r~o buildings
separated by an access drive).
SECTIOIJ 18.28.050~7-~ - Minimum dist~nc betwe?n oarallel walls of same bui]dina.
(43 feet required; 40 feet proposed for one of the tv~o
proposed builaings).
SE_GTION 18.28 050(9-b) - Livina units within 200 feet of standard street. (200
~ required; 18-units from 219 t~ ?30 f+ proposed).
SECTION 18.28 050~5-b~ - Two-storv heiaht within 150 feet of an R-A Zone. (One-
tor~ pcrmitted; 12 two-storv un~+~ Within 150 feet of an
R-A zone proposed).
2. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions aoplicable
to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally
to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
3. That the requested variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property ri.ght possessed by uther property in the sam? vicinity and zone, and
denied to the property in question.
4• T!~at the requested variance will not be materially detrimental to the public ,velfare
or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in ~vhich the property
is located.
5. That Condition ;Jo. 6 of Ordinance No. 2188, which reclassified subject property, re-
quiied development substantially in accordance with plans on file marked ~Exhibit ~los. 1 thr~ 4,
Revision No. 1; however, since a planned residential development was originally proposed, and
the petitioner is now proposing a standard R-3 project to le developed within the site develop-
ment standards of the R-3 Zone, with the exception of waivers granted under this Variance, if
any, the City Council may wish to take appropriate action to amend said ordinance by deleting
Condition Ido. 6 of Ordinance Uo. 2188.
V 1-D
' -1-
~
~,.. _ ,
_ __.__ ._ ,
,;, ___
_. __ ._
~.;, r - _ _ _
~
~;;.. 1
~,; , _
sJ
`i
y4
t;:
L;
~j NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereb
y grent subject
;.. Petition for Variance, upon the followine conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the pro-
t±. posed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safet and
~,' Anaheim. Y general welfare of the Citizens of the City of -
~i 1. That this variance is granted subject to completion of all conditions of Reclassi-
±~ fication No. 64-65-56.
z
E 2. That the sidewalks and driveways shali be installed along Velare Street, as re-
{ qui:ed by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file
j in the office of the City Engineer.
~ 3. That any air-conditioning faciltiies proposed shall be properly shielded from viPw,
~ and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent residential homes.
, 4. Drainage shall be discharged in a manner tha~ is sati:,:actory to the City ,~ngineer.
:~x 5. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
park and
,~;,:; recreation fees for each dwelling unit, as required by City Council resolutiun, which shall
be used for
ji;` para•and recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the Building
Permit is iss~~e
; 6. That Condition Nos. 2, 3, and 4, abo~~;nen{;~~r,~,ed, shall be complied with prior to
final building and zoning inspections.
;'~~, 7. That subject property shall be deve'optd sul~stantiaily in accordance with plans .
~';~ and specifications on file with the City of Ananeim, markt,j Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, and 3. ?
<i ~5:
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end approved by me this 20th day of February, 1969.
.N
~~ ~ ,
I
j :=
j`'
•. ~
i
,,~
-
tii
~~ ~~ ~
~~ I I
~~~. ' .
ATTEST:
~~~ ~ ~~~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~'~~~~~/
SECRETARI ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANANEIM ~
I, Ann KTebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
going resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
FebruaTy 10~ 1969~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AY~S~ COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Fa.rano, Gauer, !'towland, Thom.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Non e.
nBSENT: COMMISSIONERS: He~bSt.
IN WITNESS WIiEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend this 20th day of FeUruary, 1969.
~/li. ~c/ 2 t,~v~
SECRETRRY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNINr, COM67i5SION
RESOLUTION NO. 20
V2-G
-2-
~