PC 69-201RESOLk :?'tON i":': .... PC69-201
~ F:~i.Sa's[~i.;;iON OF i'z~s: (;I'fY Ft.i;>; :;?-;G CQMMISSI~N C~w^ `,,,.,:~ CI7'Y OF ANAH£1M
i:~'Chid•,kvpxMCs ~ ,-€ c~~'s~i .' < Cf.. ~3F'TIiE Cr ~' ;~' ANAHEifI TNAT
F~~c,'F't~4t~;ti crtn ... .:.io35dFT,•.^.~iTlt~"a :' i,'. 69-',`~ ~:~~ ~ DISl1PPROVED
WF{ERERS, the City Plann<;rg Cnmmis5;:%;- ::~~ ~e City of :~~aaheim did receive ~ veri[ied Petition for Re-
claasitlc~tion from CHARLES RC.':KNELL, 443 East 22nd Street, Newport Beach, California 92660,
Owner; MILLER FINANO~AL CORPORATION, 18111 East 4th Street, Suite E, Tustin,California 92680,
Agent of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
California, described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and referred to herein as though set
forth in full
; and
i
i' WHEREAS, the City Plannine Commission did hold a public heerin~ ~t th~ City Hall in the City of Maheim
on Sept. 22, 1969, et7: 30 o'clock P
M
n
ti
f
~ .
.
o
ce c
sdd public headn~ h~vta~ bNn duly ~iven ~s required by
law r~d in occordance with the provisIons oE the M~heim 6luniclpal Code, G'h~pter 1g,72
to hear and c
id
!
j ~
ons
er
evIdence far and a~ai~st aaid proposed reclusific~tian and to invNti6~te sndmofce findinp andrecommendations
` in connection therewith; and
"
~
_ WHEREAS, ~eid Commis~ton, after due in~p~ction, inw~tiptioa, end study oa~~ }!y itself ~ad in its br
helf, and nfter due consideration oE all
id
ev
ence and reports oftend at said he~das, do~s f(nd ond determine the
following fecta:
.,~ 1. fhet the petitioner proposes a recloaa3EicatIon of the above de~cdbed property hon the R-A,
; Agricultural, Zone to the R-3, Multiple-Family Residenti
l
Z
~`~
,~ ! a
,
one.
j 2. That the prcposed reclassification is not in conformance with the General Plan.
;; 3. That no land use change has taken place to war
t
~ ran
favorable consideration
of encroachment of residential uses easterly of the natural boundary -~ the Oran
e
F
i
g
reeway -
n an area being developed and proposed for industrial purpos~as.
4. That in order to assure prospective i
d
t
i
,r I
~ n
us
r
al developers and established
industries that the integrity of the northeast industrial aT~d will be maintained,
~; all types of residential uses should be rohibite
i
thi
n
s area, because, historically,
residential and industrial uses are not compatible,
5. That approval of residential uses at this location would establish an un-
desirable precedent for additional re
uests f
. q
or residential encroachment ir.to areas
_ sei aside for industrial development.
°
~ 6. That two persons appeared before the Commission representing five persons
``~ present in the Council Chamber i
i
~ n o
, pposition; and that four letters were received
~; from industries and industrial developers of property in the northeast ind
t
i
-
~
I us
r
al
area, all ~n oppositlon to subject petition.
;::
^
I
:'~ . ' ~~
.\
.
y , . ~
.`
f~ ~
~$
~ ,li
~
wl '
E~ ~ .
r,~ ~. RD
-1-
_ _...~a
~
I .
' . . _ .. ...... . .._...
~ vestee: ~
~
~ ~-
`'r ~HAS. A. ROCKWELL, a married man as his separate I
one-half interest and in IRENE S. ROCKl4ELL, a marriedewoman, as heruseparate
property as to an undivided one-half interest.
The land referred to in this report is in the state oI Cnli(ornia, count, of Orange - - ~ ~1%
~ SEE EXHIBIT "A-~ r - ~ ~ , ' ~
ti•
i, ;i SUBJECT i0: ~
~ 1. Taxes for the fiscal year 1969-7p, a lien, ncat yet payable.
a; 2.
The effect of a deed dated February 26, 1912 recorded Pdarch 1, 1912
' ' in book 20
9, page 391 oF Deeds, wnerein Anaheim Land Syndicate granted
to Anaheim Eucalyptus Water Company the right to lay and maintain pipe
lines for conducting and distributing water for irrigation and domestic
purposes, said right of way to be along the exterior boundary lines of
all lots not to exceed 10 feet on each side of said boundary.
,~~ .
~ ~ ,~.
(continued ~+ '~
~ ;,,~~i~Yr , r~O 'J;
/ r' ~~ 1
~ ~~ ~ii~ ~~ ;~1 ~s 1
~;~~LASS. !~i0. , ~:~~ ~.. ~, ;;~~,.~ ~ ~~•
N ~~~- \~= C~ D~
~ ••P.II&A.fl (Her. J.W! ~ ~ ~ ~~1;~~ ~~~J Cir
, ~ j, Q~~ 2``~ t
; ja s~~~!/~ ~ii.51~'~ir
~ ` LV~;z~z~r ~~A,~
_ ,_,_ . _ . _
_ Lot 7 in Block 8 of The Golden StatelTract, as shown on a map recorded in
book 4, pa~es 66 and 67 oi' A]iscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange
County.
EXCEPTING THEREPROM an undivided one-half of all minerals, oil, gas, asphaltum
and ~ther hydrocarbon suUstances in or unde: sai.d land, but without ri~ht of
surface entry, as reserved in the deed from Harry Sham and wife to Clarence
F. Dliller and wife, recorded March 18, 1954 in book 2690, page 442, Official
Records.
i~ ~ EXCP:PTING THER~;PROM that portion of Lot 7, in Block 8 of the Golden State
Tract, in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, as snown on a map recorded
S',~ ~ in boolt 4, page 66 and 67 of I+liscellaneous I~Iaps, in the office of the County
~` Recorder of said County, included with.:n the followin~ described lines;
, Ee~inn3ng at the intersection of the center line of Anaheim Road, 40.00
feet wide, as shown on said map, with the cent-er line of Blue Gum SL-reet,
! 40.00 feet widc, shovrn as an unnamed street ad,joinin~ said Bloclc a on the
East on said map; thcnce alon~ said centerline of Blue Gum Street, North
' 15° 58' 16" t•7est 85.00 feet; thence South 74° O1~ 411" West 30,0~ feet;
t. thence South 21° Og~ ~4" West 43,92 feet; thence South 77° 00' 23" 4Jest
! 604.40 feet to the Westerly line of said Lot
i. line, and the Southerly 7~ thence along said ~Jestez~ly
prolongation thereof, South 15° 58' 21" East, 81.57
feet to said center line of Anahelm Road; thence a1~7g said center line of
• Anaheim Road, North 74° 00' 46" ~ast, 660.10 feet to the point of beginning
as condemned by the State o~ California by fin31 decree of Condemnation
recorded March 26, 1963 in book 6482, pa~e 376, Official Records.
;~~ ,` ALSO EXC~PTING THERr:PR0A1 tnose .. 1
portions thereof included within said ~;,
Anaheim.,Rnad...and said Blue Gum Street.
"~ _ '""'` ~ _ M
, ~' NOTE:_Said land is described on the County Tax Assessment Ro11 for the
~ * - . .. , ~ .., _ . ., .. .. ~. ,
j .d~ 1'" " • - - - - -
~
N~K', THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Anaheim City Plannin
to the City Cot~~cil of the City of Anaheim that subject Petition for Reclassgficati n~sbe denie on the basis of the
aforementioned findings. doe hereby recommend
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved 1~, me\this I 2nd d~ of Gctobe
/ ~ 1969.
~~AixMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
i
y //--r:•~ j-~ ~7 / G~.~
/ i'I ` / %LI~~LE/. .
SECRETARY ANAHEIM .,ITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
.'~ COUNTY OF ORANGE J ss,
CITY OF ANAHEIM ~
~ I~ Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City plennin
B Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
:~ going resolution wes passed and adopted et a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
~ September 22 1969
+ ~ at7:30o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Farano, Gauer, Herbst. Thom, Rowland.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
~. ~ ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None.
r.
~ ~ IN WITNFSS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 2nd day of October, 1969.
b".
~- ~..~-
~~ r ; .-L .. ].~ ' ~~Z (_ l.%~/.
SECR:.TARY ANAHEIM ~ITy pLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 201
R2-D
~~ ~ 1; -z-
r~ '
i,~ ~A j
: --~^R.a.:. ~ ~•^~":;,.
~