PC 69-24RESOLLTTION N0. p~69-24
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAFIEIIN
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECL.ASSIFICATION N0. 6B'69-67 gg qppROVED
~/HEREAS, the City Planning Commission of khe CIty of Anaheim did recefve e vedfied Petition for Reclessifica-
tihn from MARY JANE PFEIi., 3064 West Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, C;lifornia 92801, Owner; PAUL B.
TREAT, P. 0. Box 7, Fullerton, California 92632, Agent of certain real property situated in
the City o; Anaheim, C~unty of Orange, State of California, described in Exhibit "A" attached
}~ereto and referred to herein as though set forth in full
~
, and
~;y
i~" WHEREAS, the CIty Plenning Commission did hold e public hearing et the City Hall in the City of kneheim on
!F February 10, 19b9, at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of seid public hearing heving been duly given es required by
~~ lew and in accordence with the provisions of the Meheim htunicipal Code, Chepter 18.72, to hear and consider evidence
for ar.d ageinst said ptoposed reclassiEication end to investigete end make findinga end recommendations in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, seid Commiasion, after due inspection, investigetion, end study made by itself end in its behelf, and
efter due conaiderstion of all evidrnce and reports offered at seid heacing, does find end determine the following fects:
1. Thet the petitioner proposes a reclessifica:ion of the above deacriMd prcperty from the R-A, Agricultural,
Zone to the R-3, Multiple Family Resideniial, Zone.
2. That although the 1969 Preliminary General Plan projects transititional loiv-medium
density uses between the ].oMr-density to the west of subject property and the medium-density to
the east, it is felt that due to the size of the parcel, it would be extreme_y difficult to
develop for low-me~ium density land use, in particular R-2-5000, One Family Residential.
3. Thet the proposed reclessiiication of subject property is necessery end/or desirable for thr. orderly and pro-
per development of the community.
4. Thet the proposed reclaesificetion of subject p[operty does properly relate to the zones and their permitted
uses locelly esteblished in close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their pecmitted uses gene:elly estab-
liehed throughout the community.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property requires the dedication an~
improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulation Elem ent of the General Plan,
due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be generated by tha intensification of
land use.
6. That one person appeared in opposition expressing concern that extending Del Monte
Drive thru the R~-1 development to the west will create a traffic hazard to the children of the
area, and that drainage will be inadequate to take care of the additional drainage from the
proposed development.
R-A
~ „t'z ':,
~ j~
~
i ;
'4 ~,. ....
-1-
~r~~
i
~ ,. .
_,„
F .
r
t
~~:~;:
ti'.
{
~.
f'
i
-? I
Fi~ 1 '
i
~ M1
., ~
.,.1 . ,:
i
,'~, i , ~
J ~ !.
W~~~~! 7~
a_
Y. x• avis _'~J~, e• + _ i
~.+ VvV'lR/w
TITLE OFFICER
VE57EE: MNRY JANE
i,
u PFEjj,~ ay her separete property,
~ .
,
• i~ ~_..-----~ .~,.__. ._ '
.~. _._.._....
_ . _. . , _
_.
'1
i
r ,
i PA?.Cc:L iv0. ~ .
`1P•1
I ~~M~ ~~^'~Tr
5
~
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16'~
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30 ~~
31 I
32
33
-- ~ C~~ ~ 2- .... .. . ..
T
'~~ f ,~~ '
~ ' ~;
. ' ` r~~', ~.
Ttiat portion of the w•est half of the west half of the
, nortneast quarter of the northeast auarFer of Section 14,
Township 4 Soutli, Range 11 West, City of Anaheim, in the
Rancho Los Coyotes, as sho~an on a map recorded in Book 51, pagell
of Miscellaneous t~aps, records of Orange County, California,
described as follo~as:
Eeginning at a point in the west line of Tract No. 4230,
with the westerly prolongation of the centerline of Del Monte
~
Drive as sho~an on a map recorded in Book 243, pages 43 and 44 of
Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County, said point
being the beginning of a nontangent curve concave northerly and ,'
having a radius of 800.00 feet,`a radial line tlirough said point
bears South 0°16'08" Ear.t; thence westerly along said curve
through a central angle of 11°40'i5" an arc distance of 162.96
teet to a point in a reverse curve concave southerly and a
radius of 800.00 feet, a radial line tnrough said point bears
L7orth 11°24'07" ~;ast; thence westerly along said curve through
a central angle of 11°40'47" an arc distanoe of 1G3.08 feet;
thence Soutn 89°43'20" t~est 8.43 feet tangent to said curve;
thence North 0°18'OS" YJest 46.19 feet; ther.ce North 89°41'S5"
E:ast 30.00 feet to a point in a non+~angent curve concave north-
easterly and having a radius of 15.00 feet, a radial through
saici point bears South f39°41'S5" West; thence southeasterly along I
said curve ~hrough,a central angle of 87°30'll" an arc distance I
of 22.91 feet to a point in a reverse curve concave southerly
~
and having a radius of 832.0p feet, a radial line through said ~
n
point bears North 2°11'44" East; thence easterly along said curve ;
through a central angle of 9°12'23" an a~c distance of 13 9 feet
to a point i~i a compound reverse curve concave north c,.2y??~~?S"'~,,>
havxng a raQius of 768.00 feet, a radial line tnrouq~' sai~a11969,ntD
bears South 11°24'07" t•iest; thence wester.l alona s lt~ ~~CGI~~} ~a
y d~~ C r~~~IPlG c~
\~,, ~~iY~br+ ,L~
through a ccntral angle of 11°40'15" an arc distar.ce~~~7~~~q ~'
feet to a point in the t~~esterly line of s2id Tract No. 9230,
, . .. . .~5. t~t~. G ~t • GS - ~'~
_ ~ ~ ~
. ~~ _ rv
;r~
'r •
~ -,
i';
~;.
~~<
;1 '
~,~ ~~
~~ ~+
~i
~~~ i
i
.=,e _
„ _
.._ . _ __.
__ _ . _.._,__ . ___ _
, _
, i, _ _ ~
. 'i
. ~r, , i~ I,t
~ I PABCEL ii0. 1~fro:it' d) `._i
I • . , ' . ..
1 a radial line througii said point bears South 0°16'08" East;
2 thence South 0°1G'OII" East 32.00 feet along said westerly line
3 to the point of beginning.
~~ PARCEL NO. 2
II e . _ --R _.r--=r.. . .
'' 1 That portion of the west half of tiie west half of the north-
'` 2 east quarter of the nortneast quarter'of Section 14, Township 4
'~
3 South; Range 11 West, City of Anaheim, in the Rancho Los Coyotes,
i
~ 4 as sho:an on a map recorded in Book 51, page 11 of Miscellaneous
s 5 t•Iaps, records of Orange County, California described as follows:
;
6 Beginning at a point in the west line of Traat No. 4230,
7~ witn the westerly prolongation of the centerli.ne of Del Monte
8 Drive as shown on a map recorded in Book 243, pages 43 and 44
9 of ~Iiscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County, said
ZO point being the beginning of a nontangent curve concave northerly
11 and having a radius of 800.00 feet,~a radial line through said
12 point bears South 0°16'08" East; thence westerly aleng said
13 curve tnrough a central angle of 11°40'15" an arc distance
14 of 162.96 feet to a point in a reverse curve concave southerly
15 and a radius o f 800.00 feet, a radial line through said point
16 be:rs idorth 11°24~07" East; therce ~vesterly a~ong said curve
17 through a central angle of 11°40'47" an arc distance of 163.08
18 feet; thence South 39°43'20" ~ilest 8.43 feet tangent to said
19 curve; tiience Soutli 0°18'05" East 32.00 feet; thence
20 IQorth 89°43'20" East 8.42 feet to beginning of a tangent
21 curve concave southerly and having a radius of 768.00 feet; thence
22 easterly along said curve through a central angle of 11°40'47" an
23 arc distance of 156.56 feet to a pdint in a reverse curve concave
24 northerly and havinq a radius of 832.00 feet, a radial line
25 through said point bears Sou*_h 11°24'07" West; thence easterly
26 along said curve throuah a central angl~>_ of 11°90'15" an arc
27 distance of 1G9.47,feet to a point in the ~vesterly ' 3~
28 said tract No. 4230, a radial line through said po'r4~~2b ~Lz 5~~~~
~' J~i~ ,~69 ~
29 Souti~ 0°16'08" ~ast; thence North 0°16'08" IVest 32 c'jt 0{~~~1v~qor~
d' 7.OI~IP1~ ~
30 said westerly line to ttie ooint ,o£ beginning. ~ oivis~~r' ti~/
c/2j ~r~ ,
31_, ~ ~~el r.,.~ L`~~'
~~» .r,~~,.:.::,v.~,M.. ~:t~,,.n..,~~. _
' , ~ _. ~ . -- - - - anmon
a .
c
NOW, 'TfiEREFORE, BE I7 •.. }E90LVED that the Anahelm Clty pl~oeii(~Comsl~sioc do~~ hereby tecommmd
to the City Counci! of the City of Aneheim thrt subject Petition for R~cla~siNe~ttoa b~ ~pproved snd, by eo doing,
that Title 1&Zoning of the Aneheim Municip~l Code be amend~d to ~:clude t~e ~bovQ d~scdb~d pmperty from the
R-A, Agricultural, Zone and to incorporate said described property into ihe R-3, Mul't~ple-
Family Residential, Zone, upon the following conditions whi;:h are hereby found to be a
necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject property in ord~r to prese:ve the
saf ety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheimo
1. T!~at the owner of subject propPrty shall deed to the City of Anaheirr a strip of land 32
Feet in width from the centerlire of the street along Grand Avenue, and a strip of land 64 f eet
in width as shown on the development plans for the extension of Del Monte Drive.
2. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering requixements of the
Ci•ty of Anaheim along Grand Avenue, Del M~nte Drive and Lincoln Avenue, such as curbs and
gutters, sidewalks, st:eet grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurten3nt work
shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and
specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that a bond in an amount and
f~rm satisfactory to the City cf Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the in-
stallation of said engineering r.equirements.
3. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2,00 p~•
front foot along C~rand Avenue, Del Monte Drive and Lincoln Avenue, for street lighting purposes.
4, That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15~ per
front foot along G*and Avenue, D~1 Monte Drive and Lincoln Avenue, for tree planting purposes.
5a That the owner of subject propert°~ shall acquire rights of access to the alley east of
subject property across Lots "B" and "C" of Tract Noo 4230.
6~ That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a
period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grar.t.
7. That the owner o:` subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim park and recreation
fees for each dweliing unit, as required by C~.ty Council resolution, which shall be used for
park and recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the Building Permit is issued~
8. That ordinances reclassifying the property shall be adopted as each parcel is ready to
comply with conditions pertaining to such parcel; provided, however, that the word "parcel"
shall mean presently existing parcels of record and any parcel or parcels approved by the
City Council for a lot split.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end epproved by me this 20th day of February, 1969.
ATTEST:
CHAIRMAN AHEIhI CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~~~~z~~~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CUmM15SION
STATE OF CALFFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Kr ebs, Secret
the foregoing resolution was pess ~d odop eldYePe~meeti g of the1City Plonn ng Commission~of theeCity of Aneheim,
held on February 10, 1969~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Farano G
, auer, Rowland, Them.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Non e.
AHSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Herbst.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend th:s 20th day of February, 1969.
~
~-~~~;z/ ~;~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM C1TY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 24
R2-A
_2.
...... .,, .
~
. ~