PC 69-50,*„~,:.
,~.f;,
's,.:;:
nti_,
j ;'
Y; .
Y
4
r
._ ~
RES~LUTION N0.
PC69-50
A RSSOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEI~1
RECOMAIENDING TO TflE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 68-69-76 gE DISAPPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Plr+nning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition far Re-
classification from JAMES A. LIBERIO, ET AL, 1720 West La Palma Avenue, Anaheim, Califor.ni~M
92801, Ovmer of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of O,range,
State of' California, described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and referred to herein a;
though set forth in full
~
~
; end
{~
WHEREAS, the City PlanninQ Commis~ion did hold e public hearing et the City Hell in the C:ty of Aneheim
on hlarch 10~ 1969~ ot 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of s~id public hearing heving been duly given es required by
law and in accoed~nce with the provi~ions of the Mahelm Municipnl Code, Chopter 18.72, to hear end consider
evidence for and a~~nat soid proposed nclassificrtion ~nd to inveetigete and molce findings and recommendetions
in connectiosi therewith; md
B'4EREAS, aaid Commission, ~ftnr due inepection, inve~tiQation, and atudy mode by itself and in its bo-
half, and a(ter due con~ideration of dl evidence and reports oEEered at s~id hearing, doea find and delermine the
following fects:
1, Thot the petltioner proposea ~ tecla~aificetion of the obove described propetty from the R-A~ Agricultural,
Zone to the R-2, Multiple-Family Residential, Zone.
2. That General Plan Amendment No. 107 to consider the possibility of either low-
medium or medium-density residential uses in the general area in which subject property
is located, was denied by the City Council October 1, 1968, when two reclassification
petitions for R-2-5000 zoning in this general were also considered.
3. That no land use chanyes have occurred since the previous consideration for an
increase in density to warrant £avorable consideration of the proposed reclasrification
at this time.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is not necessary and/or
desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does not properly relate
to the zones and their permitted uses locally estabiished in close proximity to subject
communit and to ihe zones and their permitted uses ger•~e:•ally established throughout the
Y•
6. That approval of the proposed reclassification would establish a prccedent and
patte~n for similar requests of those properties both to the west and eas~ for multiple-
family residential uses, in an area previously determined as a desirable area for lo~:-
density residential land uses by both the Commission and City Councile
RD _ 1_
*
-•-,.
~,t ;:
,
~ . ~,a..,~,...b..~ .~rm,~~,..~.-m..
;~ _~..a ,~.,..,~~- _. _.~--~-~,:,:..,.~..,.r.,r.•...;,.w~.~~,.,,~.~..:.u, , .~.~,:::~:....... ;.
~ - _^. . . , . ^ ~ ,
J ~
:~;
~~
~;.'
t'
`t:
~
~
~ ;-
r ~~
~ ~
i
~
:
~+
I~
~:
;
., ti
f
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby recommend
to the Ciky Council oE the City of Aneheim that subject Petition Yor Reclassification be denied on the basis oE the
aforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signr.d and epproved by me this 20th day of March~ 1969.
`~ „" '~~-- ~~C' ~/.~~-c.c~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIhi CITY PLANNING COMMISSIAN
ATTEST:
~v/~Z~ t% ~~~
, SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
i
il;
I~ Ann Kr ebs , Secretery of the City Plenning Commission of the City of A~aheim, do hereby certify thet the fore-
~I going resolution wes passed end adopted at e meeting of the City planning Commission of tUe City of Aneheim, held on
March 10~ 1969~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Rowland, Thom.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Non e.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereu~to set my hand this 20th day of March, 1969.
L' ~/I L, o-'C/~ / ~/ ~. ti~~.a~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~~ ~
~~ .~~ 1
RESOLUTION NO. 50
R2-D
_..~ ,
-2-
. ,..~.: - ~.:~f,.
~~~