PC 69-84" - RESOLUTION NO.
PC69-84
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 2~~4 gg APPROVED
.1
~ •l
•I .
, .~
' ~
'~
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim did receive a verified Petition for Variance from
ANAHEIM HOTEL CAMPANY, 7 Freedman Way, Anaheim, California 92802, Owner of certain real property
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange; State of California, described in Exhibit "A"
attached hereto and referred to herein as though set forth in fullo
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing et the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
April 21, 1969, et 2;00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing heving been duly given as required by
law end in accordeace with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.68, to hear and consider evidence for
and against said proposed varience and to investigete end meke Eindings and recommendations in connection therewith;
and
WHEREAS, ~eid Commission, efter due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself end in its behelf,
and after due consideretion of all evidence and reports offered at seid hearing, does find and determine the following
fects:
1. Thet the petitioner requests a veriance from the Aneheim Municipel Code as fol lows, to permit the
conctruction of two free-standing signs on subject property:
(a) SECTION 18.37.040(B-4) - Location of free-standinq siQns fro~r abuttinq prooertv.
(Minimum 120-foot separation distance in this case
required; sican No. 1- 5 feet from abutting property
line, and sion ~'o. 2- 35 feet from abutting property
line proposed).
(b) SECTIOtd 18.37.040(B-1) - Minimum distance of a free-standina sian from a roof
sign. (Minimum of 300 feet required; siqn No. 2-
200 foot separation proposcd).
~~~ _ ~~
.~ ~* ;'~
i
~ ~
l' i y;;
,.
~ ; ;i
~~
,~ -
~~ -- ---
2. That thare ara exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicabie
to the proper~y involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generaily
to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
3. I'hat the requesi:ed variance is necessa*y for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and
denied to the property in question.
4. That the requested variance will not be materially detrimental to the public
welfare of injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the
property is located.
5. That although the proposed signs are larger than permitted by code for directional
signs, subject signs are designed primarily to direct internal traffic on a large hotel
complex, and will not be used as advertising signs, since their location is more than 200
feet from any public right-of-way, and further, the petitioner stipulated to single faced
signs.
Vl" -1-
~
t'~1 ~
; f ' '{~
b
1 ::~
~ i ~"~' .
~
~~ ~
.~ ~
'; . -
' . . , ntroizTari'~r~' ~ ~ ~
John F. ~2~IIT1 WhGi rcpl~•ing refer to ,~~~
~' ' ~ Rutan £, TucF:cr . Our~o.-459736-id1..7
' S11 Tiort•ti ~roadway.
~ ' Santa Ana;' California ^,~
ALtn: Jack Yir,ccnt ' Yo~~ho. ' ~ o`
' _ •~ • ~IIrL
- The following is a rcpart of th~e titlr to thc land dexribed in your applicution for n Policy of Tide (nsurancc, and is
. mndc wilhout liability and without oblioation to issue such policy. In addition to any caccptions shown I~rrcin, nnd
not clcared, t}~e policy_ if ,ssue~i, will contain conditions and stipulations and also xcc rtions Prom its co`~ra~c a- may
bc myuired by thc partici~~ar fard~ of_policliuucd. ~~-:
• . ~, /. . ~---~'~
Dated as of E~Pr1Z-"'~ l~~bs at ?:30 a.m. ~~ /, •yi,
~ z
• 'Al. I.AS IiER~^JR. TitlcORcer
Vestee:
JOIi?i F. P,YAPI, Trustee, under Declara~ion of Trust, da~ed Dece:.~t~er
. 16, I.961 ~ as to Parcel 2, as to an estate s"or GD years cor..r:encin~
on llecez~ber 15, 19G4 and endir.~ DecenLer 14 2424~ und in ELFiCi,^,ICAL
h'URYL•RS Gii;;ErIT ASSOCIATION, a District of Colunbia corporatian, as
to Lhe rocaindcr. .
Exceptions: , ~ .
D~SG?tIPTIOi~:
~. ~ . ~ ~ .
~: _ . _ ;~ ~;
~ v
` ~ Tii;le Insur~i:lce ~nd Z'~•~st Company
ORANGE COUVTV O~~ICE J ~I G~
800 NORTH MAIN STREET SANTA ANA / ~. L:
._/ ~
' - PHONE 547.3333 " '
' ApTiI 8, I9G8 .
il. Leinr~ ali ~i,~t cer{;a;.^ portion o: lanu o: Lct ?_0 oi iraet iJo. 190~
~ in the City of ~;naneim, county of Oranye, state ci Cali:ornia, as
~- shown on Idiscellanr,ous 1l,aps, book 23 page 50 of said M scellaneous
l~~aps, said land also sho4m on Recor.d of Survey, book 38 page 16,
~' Records of Orange County, California, described as follov,s:
~.:
'~~ Beginning at the center of section 22Y Twonship 4 South, Range 10
~a ti'~est, said section also being the intersection of the c~nter lines
of Ce:ritos Avenue and Harbor Boulevard; thence South 0 13' 22"
~ - East along the center line of Harbor Boulevard 639.50 feet to a
~.; ~ point; thence North 89° 57' OS" East 660.75 feet to the true point
i~l ~ uf beginning; thence North 89° 57' 08" East 974.13 feet to a point;
thence South Oo 12' 53" East 505.42 feet to a point; thence South
~? 89° 56' 51" i'Jest 974.08 feet to a point; thence North 0° 13' 12"
' West 505.50 feet to a true point of beginning.
~
~~;~
~°:-``+
~.;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby grnnt subject
Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the pro-
posed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim.
1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accord;nce with plans
and specifications on file :vith the City of A~iaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2, provided,
however, that said free-standing signs shall be single faced, as stipulated to by the
petitioner.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this lst da}• of May, 1969.
`-1 '
,1 ~
~~ ~ I
I '.
t,
~ ..
i: a
i ~~
~~
~. ~
ATTEST:
~~ ~t ~~~ ~ ~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMh1iSSION
/' ~
! ~- G~- ~,L/'-~. ~`.~ /
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF URANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM ~
I, Ann K: eus, Secretary of the City plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certi(y thet the fore-
going resolution was passed end adopted at e meeting of the City planning Commission ofthe City of Anaheim, held on
Apri 1 21, 1969~ at 2:00 o'clock P,M„ by the following vote of the mernbers thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Farano, Gauer, Rowland.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISStONERS: Camp, Herbst, Thom.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hend this lst day of May, 1969.
C '`,-,?.-7 ;-c-~//)C-<- GC/~ i
SECRETARY ANANEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 84
V2-G
-2-
r.
P