Loading...
PC 69-88, ~ RESOLUTION NO. pC69-88 A RE~OLUTION OF THE CITY pLqNN1NG COMMISSION OF THE CITy Op qNAHEIM THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 207g BE APPROVEp } WHEREAS, the City Pbtnnin COMPANY ALBERI' S,PTOpUSBox~36682 Richfield 1Road,~fq aheim~f Californ1iae92806 verified Petition for Variance from the Cit og + Anaheim, Cagifornia 92803, '~~1~ ~'i ANACAL ENGINEERING Y Anaheim, County of Oran e State oF California, describedein Exhibit "A" hereto and referred to herein as thou h P perty situated in ;,~:~T., .~ 9 set forth in full. attached ~~ - ~ ~ ; WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a ; and ; Apri 1 21 ~ 19b9 public headng et the Cit :! law and in a ' et Z:~~ o'clock P, y Hall in the City of Anaheim on ~oordence with the provisions of the Anaheim Munici al M•, notice of said public hearing having been dul Y given as required by 'a and ageinst said proposed variance and to investi ate ~nd P Code, Chaptet 18.68, to hear and consider evidence for ~~', ~ ~a g meke findin s B end recommendations in connection therewith; ..~~:. WHEREAS, seid Commission, efter due inspection, investigation, and stud '``i ` and efter due °~ consideration of e11 evidence end reports otfered at said hearin Y made b ~'; ( fects: y itself and in its behalf, ?.;; g, does find and determine the followir.g ~'~' 1. That ti~e petitioner requests a varience from the Anaheim .~ subdivision of subject pr~perty into 35 R-1 zoned lots~cipal Code a , s follows, to permit the ~,`, ~a) SECTION 18.24.030(4-a ) - Minimum lot width. (70 feet required; 65 feet ~ ~'~ propos ~ ~ ' ~~ ~b) SECI'IOR~ 18.06.550 _~' .~ - Minimum lot width on a cul-drsac. "' 45 to~g5=t proposed .--"-' ~60-- feet Teouired; ,-~ ~~i SFCrION 18.24.030(1-a - Minimum front setback. (~~7inimum 2~Pt requi~ed; 20 f eet propos ed . ~pi SEG7ION lA.2q,030 4-b - Minimum lot size, (7200 s uare feet required; 5800 to '100 s, a~~ eet proposed . ~ 2. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or condit' to the property involved or to the intended use of the propert t the property or class of use in the same vicinit ions applicable 3• That the requested variance is necessary for the r Y that do not apply generally to ~ substantial ro Y and zone. ~ denied to the Porty ri3ht possessed by other ro P eservation and enjoyment of a ` P perty in question. p Perty in the same vicinit 4• That the req~~ted variance will not be materiall y and zone, and or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the ro is located. Y detrimental to the public welfare ~ division•ishdeemed totbesunne~f yllda Street from its r p P~tY 4~ P esent terminus thru the proposed sub- j. atmosphere, essary since the proposed design would j~, pruvide a more private Vl-D ~ -1- ~ LE~~L DESCRIPTION FOR TRACT N0. 69; ~ _~'; , ' ~•~~, Being a portion of the southwcst quarter of the southeast quarter ~~r•' of Section 13, Township 4 South, Range 10 West, SBM in the Rancho ~~ San Juan Cajon de Santa Ar~a in the county of Orange, state of `"~ ~ California, as per map recorded in book 51, page 10 of Misceila- ~~ ' neous Maps in the office of the CounCy Recorder of said county, ~ described as follows: • ~ Beginning at a point on the westerly line of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 13 (also being the center line of Sunkist Street) distance North 0° 11' 20" East 205,00 feet from the south quarter corner of said Sectlon 13 (also being the center line intersection of Ball Road and Sunkist Street); thence along said westerly line North 0° 11' 20" East 504.00 feet to a point on the southwest corner of Tract No. 6496 recorded in book 2A0, pages 40 and 41, Miscellaneous Maps, r•ecords of said county; thence along Lhe south line cf said tract South 89° 55' 40" East 677.70 feet to the southeast corner of said "'ract No. 6496, said corner also being on the westarly line of Tract No. 4030 as per map ~ecorded in book 150, pages 48, 49 and 50, of Miscellaneous Maps, records o£ said county; thence along said westerly line South 0° il' 20" West 443.86 feet to the southerly corner of said Tract No. 4030; thence South 51° 20' 11" , West 24.14 feet; thence South 52° 27' 06" West 73.76 feet to a point which is 205.00 feet measured at right angles from thr, south line of said Section 13; thence parallel and distanca 205.00 feet from said south line North 89° 55' 40" West 600.56 feot to the point of beginning. ~ . `' ,/~L.~~ U c ~ ~:~~ I :~ ~ ~3 ~i •l ~ w j ~~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~:~:~>. z;=: .:;,, . ,t,,. `~: ~.>.. ' s NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Analieim City Planning Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the pro_ posed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety end generel welfare of the Citizens oEthe City of Anaheim. 1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 68-69-84. 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, narked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. - THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end approved by me this lst day of May, 1969. ~ ~/: ~-G ~~~~~ ~ , / ~ CHAIRMRN n~N'qf1EIM CI?` ~~'~.''L__ 1 . Y pr;.pnVxixc; ,co~5iMlsstnlp ATTEST: ' ~ ~ li~ L~ ~, ~ ~_ !r SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ~ I, Ann Krebs ~ Secretery of the City plenning CommtssIon ot the Ci(j~ Olf pnohei/^+, do hercby certify ttiat thr fore- going resolution wes passed and edopted at a meeting of the City Planning Coa~lml~!~lon of the City of Aneheim, held on ,. April 21, 1969~ et 2:00 o c~ock P,M., by the following vote of the members thereof: I:' AYES: COMMiSS:ONERS: Allred, Farano, Gauer, Rowland. . NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None. ABSENT: COb1MiSSIONERS: Camp, Herbst, Thom. IN WITNESS WHGREOF, I heve hereunto set my hend thts ls t day of May~ 1969. ~~~.,z,r~ ~~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CONiMISSION RF,50LUTtON N0. 88 V2-G -Z- ~