PC 70-144RESOLUTION N0. pC70-144
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSIOM OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 2194 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim did receive a veriEied Petition for Vetience
from HERBERT AND ETHEL MYFR;;, 529 Victoria Ave~ue, 'Jenice, California 90291 and TOA1MIg g, qND
HELL•N M. CARTER, 806 Valencia Mesa Drive, Fullerton, California 52632, Owners; U, S. FACTORY
BUILT, INCORPORATED, 1'7461 Irvine Boulevard, Suite A, Tustin, California 92680, Ager.t of
•--~,~ certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
'~ ''~ descsibed as the East 420.00 feet of the Northerly 120.00 feet of the Southerl
~~ ~~ of that y 240.00 feet
~ 12, Pages~871and~88Lof MisceBlaneous~RecordsrofmLosTAngeless SBeginning atPthecNorthwestBook
I eoxner of said Lot; thence Easterly 660.00 :eet along the North boundary thereof; thence
~ I~ Southerly 825.00 feet parallel with the West boundary of said Lot; thence Westerly 660.00
I I feet parallel with the North boundary of said Lot to the VJest boundary of said Lot; Northerly
~ I 8hat00 feet to the point of beginning. The East 420.00 feet of the Southerly 120.00 feet of
! _ portion of Lot 2 in Block K of the Kramer Tract, as shown on a Map recorded in book 12,
pages 87 and 8Q of Miscellaneous Records of Los Ange].es County. Beginning at the Northwest
I~ corner of said Lot; thence Easterly 660,00 feet along thc North boundary thereo'r; thence
~ Southerl~ 825.00 feet parallel with the West boundary of said lot; thence PJesterly G60.00
1 feet parallel with the North boundary of said Lot to the West boundary o: said Lot; Northerly
I t325.00 feet to the point of beqinning.
~
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing et the City Hell in the City of Aneheim
on August 10, 1970~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public heering heving been duly given ss required
by law and in eccordance with the provisions o( the Anaheim A1unicipal Code, Chapter 18.68,to heer end consider
evidence for end against said proposed varience nnd to investigete and meke (indings and recommendations in connec-
', tion therewith; and
WHEREAS, seid Commissinn, after due inspection, investigetion, and study mnde by itself end in its behelt,
and after due consideretion of all evidence end reaorts ofEered et seid hearing, does find and determine the following
facts:
1. Tliat the petitioner requests e varience (rom the Anaheim Municipel Code as follows, t0 permit out-
door storage of pre-fabricated housing units:
SECTION 16.52.06U(3-b) - Required 5-foot masonry wall, (Code requires a
6-foot masonrv wall to enclose outdoor uses. Petitioner
propose~ a chain link fence).
2. Thet there ere exceptionel or extreordinary circumstonces or conditions epplicable to the propetty involved
or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generolly to the property or claes of use in the seme vicinity
and zonc.
3. That the requested variance is necessary (or the pre,ervation end enjoyment of a substanti3l property ~~ght
possessed by other property in the same vicinity end zone, end denied to the propecty in question.
4. That the requested variance witl not be materially detrimentel to the public welfare or injurious to the prop-
erty or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is loceted.
5. That the petitioner stipulated to providing dense screen landscaping at a height
and size that would insure complete screening of the outdoor storage area within a period
of two years.
.~x
~ V1-G -1-
,
.
.
.f
,^
~ ~
.
: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT f2ESOLVED that the Aneheim City Planning Commission does hereb
Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which ere hereby found to be a necessa
posed use of the sub'ect y grant subject
Anaheim. ~ property in order to p~eserve the safet and ~Y prerequisite to the pro-
Y general welfare of the Citizens of the City of
1. That all air-conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from view.
2. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
~ 3. That the required 50-foot setback along Miller St:eet shall be fully ~,andscaped
and provided with permanent irrigation facilities; said landscaping to consist of dense
screen landscaping adjacent to the chain link fence; plans for said landscaping to be
submitted to the D~ve?.opment Services Department for approval.
4. That subject ~roperty shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans
and specifications on f:le with the City of Anaheim, mar)<ed Exhibit No. 1,
5. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with
to the commencement of the activity authorized under this resolution, or
that the buildin Prior
whichever occursQfirst,torssuchUfurtherWtimenas the1PlanninneCommission marior to the time
6. That a time limitation of two years for this use shallYbergrantedhe~datU onreef,
g y grant.
by the petitioner, an additional period of time may be granted b
~ P ques t
y the Planning Commission.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 20th day of A~9ust, 1970.
,
~Y ~G/
-'CHAI MAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
/ ~
.~G- ~ L-7-~C i"-
~-G ~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITy pLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIh1 ~
I, Ann Krebs~ Secretary of the City Plannin
Baing resoluticn was passed ond ado B Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certiEy thet the fore-
Augus t 10, 1970 Pted at a meetin of the Cit Plonnin
r at 2:00 o'clock P,M., by the [ollowing vote of t eomembe snthercof•C,ty uf qnaheim, held on
AYES: COMM[SSIONERS: Allred, Fa:ano, Gauer
, Kaywood, kowland, Seymour, Herbst.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend this 20th day Of Augus t, 1970.
~ ~ ,
' ~ ~ ~: Jy~~l
~~~ ~ ~'Z<__~.z.
SECRETARy ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~ RESOLUTION NU. 144
~ '
,~ * ~2-c
~ ,~ _2.