PC 70-1511
RESOLUTION NO..,_ p~~~-i51 ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY pI,pNNIN~ CO
RECOMMENDIIVG TO THE CITy Cp MMISSION OF T
PETITION FOR REC:,ASSIFICATIONjL ~~ HE CITY OF ANqHEIM
THE CITY OF ANqHEIM THAT
N0. 6 -70-50
k'HEREAS, the BE AppROVED
tion pr~m qLqNgON ~i~y Planning Commission of the
WIDE INVESTORS ~D HA~EL h1. Lp~~D~ p, p City of Anaheim did recelve a
of cer ~ INCORPpRqTED Box ~039, pomona Verified Petition for Reclassifica-
tain real propert ' 443 East Wardlow ' ~alifornia
California, described i~ Eltuated in Road, Lon 91166, Owners•
forth the City of Anaheimg Beach, California ' STATE-
in full, xhibit 'A" attached ~ ~ount 90807~ Agent
hereto and referretl~to0range, State of
herein as though set
k'NEREAS, tha City Plannin
Au9ust 24, 1970 g COmRission did hold a
1eW and jn a ' a~ 2~00 a'clock P. P°b~'~ hearing st !he % end
ccordance with the M• notice of seid City Hall in the
for and egainst seid Provisions of the Public hearin C~~Y of qnaheim on
therewith; and PtOposed reclessification and to~i~ eS gatePandCode, g heV1°g been dul
Chapter 18,72~ y g1°P•"• as required by
make findin ~O hear a.,r} considet evidence
gs and recommendations in connection
~yHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, inves '
after due consideration of a11 evidence and
~eports offered et said at,~n~ end study made by itself and in its behalf, and
1• That the hearing, does find and determine
Commercial Petitioner proPoses a reclassijication of the followin
~ Zone to the R-3, Multi the above described B facts:
2• That the scope of the ple Famil • property from the C-1
an amendment to the General plaprat°sed reclassification, ~fna~ ~ General
General Plan symbol will be consi ~h~
present time; however,pProved, does r.ot warrant
dered at the next annuai its relationshi
review, P to the
3• That the proposed reclassification
per development of the community, °f subject propert
4• That the proposed reclessification y 15 necessary and/or desirabie
uses locelly established of subject propert tor the orderly and pro-
lished throu in close proximity to subject propert Y does p~operl
ghout the community. Y and to the Z y relate to the zones a
5• That the ones and their ermitted uses ~heir permitted
of grass and Petitioner stipulated to P Benerally estab-
buildin S trees on the Edison ease Providin
9 an~ court ment - Portiongga~ditional landscapin
ment. yards in order to impr~ve the ad g 1~ the form
environme~ta~~t to ihe proposed apartment
qualities of the develop-
R-q
-1-
~~*.r,~+ ~ ----- --~...~,~ . . , , ..
._
,
. ~
. _~ i
" PC70-151
RESOLUTION N0.
A RESOLUTiON OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
I RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
~ PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 69-70-50 gE qppROVEA
~
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Reclassifica-
tion from ALANSON AND HAZEL M. LOUD, P. 0. Box 203S, ?omone, Calirornia 91166, Owners; STATE-
WIDE INVESTORS, INCORPORATED, 443 East Wardlow Road, Long Beach, California 90807, Agent
of certain real prop?rty situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
California, described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and refer•red to herein as though set
forth in full.
?j ~
~~
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hnld a public hearing at the City Hell in the City of Anaheim on
August 24, 1970~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of seid public hearing having been duly given as required by
lew and in eccordence with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18,72, to hear and consider evidence
for end ageinst seid proposed reclessification and to investigate and make findings and recommendetions in connection
therewith; end
~VHEREAS, said Commission, efter due inspection, investigation, and study mede by itself end in its behalE, and
efter due consideration of all evidence and reports oEfered at seid hearing, does find and determine the following fects:
1. That the petitioner proposes a reclassifica~::~a of the above described property from the G1, Gene*al
Commercial, Zone to the R-3, htultiple Family Residential, Zone.
2. That the scope of the proposed reclassification, if approved, does not warrant
an amendment to the General Plan at the present time; however, its relationship to the
General Plan symbol will be considered at the next annual review.
3. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is necessary and/or desireble for the orderly and pro-
per development of the community.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does properly relate to the zones and their permitted
uses locally established in close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally esteb-
lislted throughout the community.
5. That the petitioner stipulated to providing additional landscaping in thc form
of arass and trees on the Edison easement - Portion B- adjacent to the proposed apartment
6uildings and court yards in order to improve the environmental qualities of the develop-
ment.
R-A
-1-
c • .
f
~14:~"aT~ ~
i ~ '~ .
`{' ?, ALANSON R. LOUD and HF~L bi. LOIID, husbznd and wi ;.
I
,~ i
i
~_~ ~ F~~ ~-~-, `t A
~,
' 1'hc ]and referrcd to in this report is situated in t}ie State of Calafornia, County of Oran~e
and i~ desc ' icd a~ follo~ti•s:
~~~?C~ ~. ~ :
;`` ~~=v~-u-1: The Easterly i32.50 feet or the %orz;least quart~r of t~e
i;orth;•:est qu2rttr of tiie Nor~neast qt:arter cP Sectioi~ 13, To~:•r:ship 4
Souti~, R~r,~;e 11 ?;'esY., in L'nc Rancno Los CoS~otes, ir zhe City of An~2:ei^:,
; as uai~ sectior, is :,..ot•rn o.1 a~ap :~cord4d in book 51, ;~a~e 11, A;iscel-
!:~ ianeous i•:ans, records of sald O.rar.ge County;
~'i
EXCEPl ti~e Nortn 66.00 ~eet th~reo;';
ALSO LYCP.PT ~,n undivici2ci 35/40ths intereGt ir. a wa~er i•rcll ~..~d ~~ur~pin~;
plant locaz~fl ?79.4g ieet Sou:.~h and 25,00 Peet 6fest of ~he Nortiieast
, CiOi~riP:~ NIZC "'POT•
~ .~% r ~I ~~ ~ •
;'` :'~A1?C~`L-2: T'r.e P;orth i~alf. of tna PJorfh~a~t c;u».r~ar o~' the ;•;o.rtheasL-
_ quar•ter of ~ection 13, Tovnship 4 5c~,tt-h, Run~;e 11 ~9es~, ~n thc~ Rancno
Los Cc~~o~cs, in L•he Citl~ of Ana;~eirn, Rs ~aid section is shovrn on a,~.ao
the.eof. recorced ir. bool~ 51, ea;e 11, t•ilscellan~ous f+Iaps, rscords cz
s4ic: Or~nge Count,y;
M
~
EXC~PT the Dlortn 66,00 iEet thereof;
- ALSO ~XCEPT ti,e Eas~ 1198,00 feet ~heraaf;
ALSO EXC~PTII•ic: TfiEREFRObI Parcels 1 anfl 2 tn2t portion that is included
~•rithin <. strio o;' land 70. UO feet in v;idth, lyin~ 30, 00 f. eet ;•;ortherly
and I1ort:,rresterly, and 110, 00 Feet Sou~herly and Southeasterly of the '
fo~loicin3 3escribed lirie: • - - j
/.-.~,7 f`?' ~-'.~~~:,. I
Comrsencin~; at the center line interaecLior. of Lincoln Avenue .ind f•ia~nolia
Street; _a,s sMid intersectj.oa is si~ol;n in Cour,ty Sw~ve,yor's Tr~nuit l;ook
' iUf3, paRe y9 on Jun~ 1~1, 1957 on fi].e in the Count,y Surv<~;~or'.^, Office
I of Oran~;e Count,y; tt~ence Soiith 8y° ?_~' 10" l•iesr, ~,lan~; ~aici center line
of Lincoln 1',venuE bf3G.95 feet to the true noint o° be;;innin~; tl:ence
South 13° 25' 10" l•lest 11G.fi0 fe_•t to the bt~;inn:in« cf n eurve L-anr;ent
concave tlortli+resterl,y and 'navini; a radius ot' 7a~, p0 i'eet; ti~e~nce :?outh-
vre~terly ~lon~ s~ id curve• throu~;h a central 2n;;le of 63° 21{- 20" ~n arc
distance o£ LG3,18 feet to a line tannent; thence South 76° 49~ ~p~~ t•,est
alonm said tan;^;ent' line 237.50 feet to the be~;innin~ of a curvc L•anr;ent,
concave Northarl,y and }iavin~; a radius of. ].000.00 f.eet; Lhence ,~lesterly
~:lonm ~aid curve throumh a~cen~ral anr;le of 12° 3~{' 1Q" an arc di~t-ance
of' 219.39 i'eet to a line tan,:,e~zt; thance South ~39° 23' i{0" West alonP;
s2ic; ~an;ent line 907.87 feet ~o a point on ttie center line of. Dule
Stree:t, r,lst~nt L-hereon South 0° 2S' 20" I:ast 761.90 feet fron the inter-
s~~ction ivith s~icl center ].ine of Lincoln l:venue ~s shown on s2iti County
' Surv~yor's Transit Boo;c 108, p2~;~ i{~, ~
iu01~ "i: Said l~uid is describe@ on ~he Cou~atv Tax Assessment Roll for tne
fiscal ye~,r 1969,70 as A. P, No. 126_022-20; CA 1-029.
i ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ !
I`' '`y'r • '~' ~
~c ~ ~` ' ,
\ . J /% .
c' 0
~ v„ . . ~ ~
P-11G.C fQS.) n~n~ ~ n, Nr ~ ~~ 1
~ \, ~~ ~
CL1'A Proliminary Ropot~ Form Of {1~V1 ~SJS. ~tY( {. ~~ ~cri% t.-. .. -2,~r '
~ .~ ..~......:c ~:J ~;
~ , ._ _...._
. ~. . _ _.-_.~..,, - _ . , . . _ `
~,
F,
, ~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE I'I :iSOLVED thet the Aneheim City Planni ~ommission does hereby recommend
` to tKe City Council of the City of qneheim thet subject PetitIon for Reclessifica~ion be eppmved and, by so doing,
that Title 18-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipel Code be emended to exclude the above described ptopecty from the
C-1, General Commercial, Zone and to incorporate said described prope*_•ty into the R-3,
. Multiple-Family Residential, Zone, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to
be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject property in order to ~reserve
the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
1. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of ~2.00
per front foot along Lincoln Avenue for the easterly 132 feet for street ligtiting pur oses.
, EngineerTand ineaccordance withlstandardap).ansaa~d~specificationseonsfileuinetheYofficeloy
the City Engineer. f
3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accardance with approved plans on file
with the office of the Director of Public Work~.
4. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by
T~T~ the Chief of the Fire Department.
5. That a11 ai*-conditioning facilities shall be properly sliielded from view.
i ~{; 5. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
~ ~'-y %. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner that is satis-
factory to the ~;ty Engineer.
~'` ~. That the owners of sub'ect
~` ~ property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $75
per multipl.e-family unit to be used for park and recreation purposee, said amount to be paid
~'' at the time the building permit is issued.
9. That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the east and south property
lines.
10. That additional landscaping in the form of grass and trees shall be installed cn the
Edison easement - Portion B- adjacent to the proposed apartment buildin9s and court yards.
11. prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoninc~ subject oroperty, Condition IJo.
1, above mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or ri hts
shall become null and void by action of the City Council urless sagdaconditiorslareecomplied
with within 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the ~ity Council may
grant.
12. That Condition Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, above mentioned, shall be
complied witfi prior to final building and zoninq inspections.
; THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 3rd day of September, 19i0.
i '
J \ ~'~ ~ ~ _-
_ , , `
~' CHAI MRN ANA'f-[EIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
AT.TEST:
L/vy/~1--L-/ `~,~~, /
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing resolution was ppssed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
held on Augus t 24, 1970~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Farano, Gauer, Kaywood, Rowland, Seymour, Herbst.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMIS$IONERS: Allz•ed.
IN WITNESS A'HEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3rd day of September, 1970.
RESOLUTION NO. 151
R2-A
_/_='~~L~c ~~,~~
SE,CRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-2-
5
C