PC 70-152•-~.,:-
t:
~,
J
;
~
~.
RESOLUTION NO
PC70-152
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 2171 gg APPROVED
WHEREAS, thc City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim did receive a verified Petition for Variance from
ALANSON AND HAZEL M. LOUD, P. 0. Box 2039, Pomona, California 91166, Owners; STATE-WID[
INVESTORS, INCORPORATED, 443 East 'Nardlow Road, Long Beach, California 90807, Agent of
certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
described in Exhibit "A" atta:,~ed hereto and referred to herein as though set forth in full.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commieaian did hold a public hearing nt the City Hell in the City of Anaheim on
August 24, 1970~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing heving been duly given es required by
law and In eccordance withthe provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.68, to hear and consider evidence for
and ageinst said proposed vatience end to imveatigate end meke findings end recommendetions in connection therewith;
end
WHEREAS, eaid Commission, aftet due inspection, investigation, and study mede by itself end in its behalf,
and aEter due consideration of all evidence and reporta offe~ed at seid heacing, does find end detertnine the following
fects:
1. Thet the petitioner requests a verience from the Aneheim Municipel Code as follows, to estabi ish a
42-unit, two story apertment complex:
a. SECTION 18.28.050(5-b) - Maximum buiidin heiaht within i50 feet of an R-A,
Zone. (one-story permitted; two-storv propos~d .
b. SECTION 18.28.050(6-b-2) - Minimum side vard setback (5 feet required; 3
feet. proposed).
i :
1 I
i i
1
' ~
4
r:
+. .
L~ ~
'~ ,
~~ p
~
~ i
I
:r
~ ._ ,
~ , __
2. That w•aiver 1-a, above mentioned, is hereby granted on the basis that it is improbable
tha± single family residentiai uses would ever be deveioped on the property to the east, and
the Edison easemen•c to the west would permit no structures whatsoever.
3. That waiver 1-b, above mentioned, is hereby granted on the basis that said ser.bach
would be adjacent to th? Edison easement ~Nhich was proposed to be developed with arass and
trees, and this easement would preclude the development oi any structures.
4. That ti~ere a*e exceptionai or extraordinary circumstances or condiCions applical~le to
the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not appiy generally to
the property or class of use in tfie same vicinity and zone.
5. That the requested variance is necessary for the pres~rvation and enjoyment of :~
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and
denied to the property in question.
6. That the requested variance wiil not be materially detrimental to the public welfare
or injurious to the ~roperty or improvements in such vicinity and zone in ~vhich the property
is located.
7. That the petitioner stipulated to providing aciditional landscaping in tlie form of
grass and trees on the Edison easement - Portion B.
r,
E
_:iT'~L''
,~i ~
, ~:
i
i
,~
•1
N '~
~ . _.. . . .. ., . . .
;;
`~'ALAPISUN R. LOUD and HP~`~L N. LOUD, husband and w{ ~,
i , ); ~-~' -~~ 'I ^'~ "~~1 »
.,_ ~, .. .. ~ ~
y
1'hc ]and refcrred to in tl~is zeport is situated in dic State of Cal~fornia, Cor~nty of Orant*,e
and is described as follows:
I PAP•,C~'L 1: Tne Easterlv 132.50 feet of the iVortheast quarter of the
i;orthcvest auarter of the NorY,heast quartc:r of Section 13, ^o~~rnship 4
South, Ran~e 11 :~!est, in the Rancho Los Coyotes, in the City of Anahein,
as said section is shorm on 2 I12D recorned in book 51, page 11, P~iiscel-
laneous i4ans, records of said Oran,e Count;y;
~XCEPT the North 66,00 feet tnereof;
ALSO ~XCEPT an undivided 35/u0ths interest in a water vrell Gnd oumping
pl~nt locate~ 179.4g feet South and 25.00 feet l~iest of the Northeast
corner thereof.
- ?ARCEL 2; The :;orth half of the Northeast quarter of the Idortheast
quarter of Section 13, Tovrnshin 4 South, R~,n~e 11 t~!est, in the P,ancho
Los Coyotes, in th~ Cit~~ of Anai~eim, as said section is shovm on a rnap
tnereof recorded in boo:c 51, bage 11, Miscellaneous Maps, r~cords of
said Oran,r~,e County;
EY.C~PT the North 66,00 feet thereof;
ALSO EXCEPT tne i::ast 1198.00 fent thereof;
ALSO EXC~PTID;r T:iEREFROhI Parcels 1 and 2 th2t nortion that is included
~~` ~•rithin a strin of land 70, 00 ieet in .•~idth, lyin~; 30, 00 feet ?
I and ivorthtvesterl,y, and 40.00 £eet Souther7.y and Soutneasterly. oftthely
I following described line:
Commet~cinrc at t}le cenL-er line inte~~section of Linecln Avenue and 'Rar;nolia
Street; as JGici intersection is snotvn in Countv Surveyor's Tran ;it P,oo'r,
• lOf3, p~ r;e ~~~ ~;~ June 1~1, 195; on file in t!
or Oran~^e Counuy; ti~ence South $ 0 2r ~ ~~ ~e,Count,y Surve;~or' ~ OfTice
of Lincoln ~1venue GfiG, n- 9 > 1C l~,~st- aJ.onn sai<; center line
' Soutl: 13° 7~ „ t 5 feet to ~tie true noin~ o: be ;innin;-, thence
5 10 t•,est 116.60 fe~t L-o L-tie berinninn of u cur. ve tan~;ent-
i'; concave iiortt;•r;esterlv and 'r,avinr; a radius of 780, p0 feet; t~ence South~
; YttStZrJ.V 2lOri~?; S£;jCl CUT'VC ti~rou~*n a centr.^,], ~„p^je Oj' (~~o ~(I~ 20ti ~n 3T•C
dzstance of £~G3.1~ feet to a lir,e tanTent; thence South 76° U9~ 3~" ?~1est
!" alonm s~id tan;ent line 2
~:; concave ldortherl 37•50 feet to the ~~riilp~n~ of a curve tc~nr;ent,
,y anri h2,ving a radius o£ 10U0,00 f.eet; ~hence l~7esterly
alon~ said curve throua'r, a central anrle of 12° 3~a' 10" an arc distance
Y of 219.39 feet to a line tan~;eiit; tnence South ~° 2~ t~~ r
said L-an~ent line 907.$7 feet to a noint on t}~e center line`of.tDalen~
Street, distant thereon South 0° 28' 20" East 761.90 feet from the inter-
section tivith said center line of Lincoln Avenue as shoVrn on said County
~ Surve,yor's Transi~ Boo:; 10$, n2ae ~~q_
NO^E. Saiu lana ls cescribed on the County ^ ~
R fiscal year 1969-70 as A. P. No. 126_022_2~~ax~AsieO~9ent Roll for tne
x
i ;,cl . ;~J;'/':,~Q ~0 'i
~pn ~ `~ ~" ~'.'
' , rttc.c tc.sa ~~~il~l^'~C~' I~~i ~~"~ Ss ~'/ ~
CWA Preliminary Roport Form pf ~- .~ '-~'~ -, ti'~' /
r ~
~.ae_ -~~_' _, -~.. .. .....».-.~.,,~,~w~.,y ~\~:'~C~~ ~
~ ~`~ ."____- ~~._. --' ' ~
... ..~_,. . --^ .:~ .,. , .
' • . • . _" . ~ " . ~Yq{~..,.. ~- s ~ . . _ _. /
~
J
1
t j
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby grant subject
Petition Eor Variance, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary pr?requisite to the pro-
~ posed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of
! Anaheim.
. 1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No.
69-70-50.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and
specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, mu:ked Revision No. 1, Exhi.bit Nos. 1 and
2, provided, however, that the petitioner provide additional landscaping in the form of
grass and trees on Portion B, as stipulated by the petitioner.
R:~a:~
._:4
~ +,
.:
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIOV is signed and approved by me this 3rd day of September, 1970,
i ~ • ' l~'~
/ G~
J_ --' CH RMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
- ~/~~~ /d"~-~-L~%
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMhtISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
{ CITY OF ANAHEIM )
~. I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
going resofution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City planning Commission ofthe City of Anaheim, held on
Auaus t: 24, 1970, at 2;00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote oE the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Farano, Gauer, Kaywood, Rowland, Seymour, Herbst.
NC~ES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
I
, ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Allred.
i
~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set m hand this
i Y 3rd day of September, 1970.
.~ /~'
~?2 f2 ~.~~_~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~ i ,.
~ !~' ' RESOLUTION N0. 152
_ V2 G -2
~ '
~ !~
`~~ j :
~ ~ I~
` i
~F i ~
~