PC 70-165RESOLUTION N0. pC70-165
A RESOLUTION OF THG CITY PLANNING COMMISSION Or THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 2200 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Varience
irom FAYE COTLER, 731 Nor.th Harbor Boulevard, Anaheim, California 92805, Owner; C. M. THON50N,
2912 Collyer Lane, Anaheim, California 92806, Agent of cer•;:~in real property situated in
the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as Lot No. 3 of Tract
No. 42b, recorded in Book 17, Page 45 of Miscellaneous Maps.
~'i
,:
; end
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Ha11 in the City of pneheim
on SPptember 10~ 1970~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., netice of seid public hearing having been duly given as required
by law and in accordance with the provisions o( the Anaheim Municipel Code, Chapter 18.68,to hear and consider
evidence for and ugainst seid proposed verience and to investigate end make finding~ and recommendations in connec-
tion therewith; and
WHEREAS, seid Commissi~n, efter due inspection, investigetion, and study made by itself end in its behelf,
and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find end determine the following
facts:
1, That the petitioner requests a veriance trom the Anaheim Municipal Code as follows ~ to permit the
construction of an additional dwelling unit on subject property:
a. SECTION 18.~8,050(3) - Minimum floor area per dwellinq unit. (700 square
`~,~ feet required; 43i square feet proposed).
b. S ECTION 18.28.050(5-b) - PAaximum buildina heipht within 150 feet of an R 1
Zone. (One-story permitted; two-storv proposed).
2. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions appliceble to the property involved
or to the intended use of the p~operty that do not apply generally to the property or class of use in the same vicinity
and zone.
3. That the requested vnriance is necessery for the preservation end enjoyment of e substentiel property right
possessed by other property in the some vicinity end zone, and denied to the property in question.
4. That the requested veriance will not be materielly detrimental to the public welEare or injurious to the prop-
erty or improvements in such vicinity ond zone in which the property is loceted.
5. That because of the two types of uses proposed for subject property, in order to
insure that adequate parking will be available, the Planning Cornmission amended cenditions
of approval of Varianc? No. 887, to which the petitioner will have to stipulate to and
which are needed to effectuatie aoproval of subject petition.
`}?
a
:~
~ _
1 *
_`~ ~ V1-G
~;
-1-
r. ~
~E `~.
~, -
~ _..__
IvOW, THEF:EFCRE, BE IT RESG~[,'•.~£p thet the Anahei:n City Plenning Commission does hereby grant subject
Petition for Varisnce, upon the fallowinq ~U~~itions which dre hereby found to be a nec~ssery prerequisite to the pm.
posed use of the subject properly in order to preserve the safety and general welfare .f the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim.
1. :'hat t'~e owner of subject property shall deed to the City r,f ,~naheim a strip of land
45 feet in width from the :.?nterline of the street along Haz•bor Boulevard and 2~-feet in width
from the centerli~e o` T',e alley for street and a11ey wideninc purposes.
2. That the owner '?' s~~ojec± pxo~~rty shaJl pay t~ the Ci±y of Anaheim the sum of $75 for
the additional unit, ^~~ :,e usF~ to- pa:k and recrr~tioc~ purposes, said amoun± to be paid at
the time ths buildir~ permiL is issueri.
3. That the vehicalar rcces; riphc~,, e7.ce;: at streat ar.d~or alley openinos, to Harbor
Boulevard shall be rlec'icn:~~d tc, ~nr Ci'y a'i A.•,al-,eim.
4. That the existii;g dri~eway on Has~r,.: 3ouie~;3zd s~.all be removed and replaced with
standard sidar~i;.'., cu:1• ~no ^utter.
5. That tr~ ex:stini~ st.*.::cture sha11 be >r;~uyht up to the minimum standards of the City of
Anaheim, ir.--1ud',~^ the uniform Buildina. ~l'~mh'~•.y~ Electrical, Housing, Mechanical and Fire
Codes as adopt~ d;~~• the City of Anahei.m.
b. That. sub~~ct oron~*ty shall be dc- ,.lqoed substantially in accordance with plans and
specifications on f_ie with the Ci±;, a•r ;;~,; ~eim, marked Fxhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
7. That Condition No. 1, above mentio:~~~, shall be conplied with prior to the commencement
of the activity authorized u~c~er t1~is ~soluti~on, or prior to the time that the building permit
is issued, or within a perio,i of ^ne ,,,r from date hereof, or such further time as the
Planning Commission :~ay grantr
, B. That Condition Nos. 3, 4, 5, ar~d 6, above mentioned, shall be complied with pri~r to
final bui!ciing and zoning inspect't~.~~,
9. That the granting of Vari;~-: e~;o. 2200 is made subject to the petitioner stipulating,
in written form, to the li~nitativns attached to Variance No. 887, in Resolution No. PC70-
165-A.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end epproved by me this 17th day of September, 1970.
i
~`~~ .//~ fi ,.
~ r ~G-
CHA~RMA- N pNp E M CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
Sc.CRETARY ANAHEiM CITY PL.~NNING COMM[SSVON
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs ~ Secretary of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hereby certify thet the fore-
going resolution was passed and edopted at a meeting of the City Plenning Commission ofthe City of Aneheim, held o~
September 10~ 1970~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the tollowing vote of the members thereof:
:~.YES: COMMISSIONERS: Farano, Gauer, Kaywood, Seymour.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Herbst.
ABSET!T: COMMISSIONERS: Allred.
A~TAIN: CO~J~MISSIONERS: Rowland.
IN W'%:tiESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 17th day of September~ 1970.
~.
(, ~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
_ RESOLUTION NO. 165
~' V2-G
.~x '2'