PC 70-223RESOLUTION NO. PC70-223
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT FETITION FOR VARL4NCE N0. 222Z gg APPROVED
~ WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive e verified Petition for Variance from
; RALPH WHEATON, 610 South Loara Street, Ar.aheim, California 92802, Owner; JAMES K. SCHULER
AND ASSCCIATES, WILLIAPI S, PHELPS, i095 rorth Main Street, Suite 5, Orange, California
92667, Agent of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange,
- State of California, described in L•xhibit "A" att~ched hereto and referred to h~rein as
~T though set forth in full.
;
~ i .
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing et the City Hall in the City of Aneheim on
December 14, 1970, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public heering heving been duly given as required by
~ lew end in accocdence with the provisionc of the Aneheim Municipel Code, Chepter 18.68, to hear end consider evidence fnr
; 4 and egeinst seid proposed verience and to inveatigete end meke findings end recommendetions in connection therewith;
;~ and
i ::
~ WHEREAS, eaid Commission, efter due inspection, investigetion, end study mede by itself and in its behalf,
_ end efter due consideretion of ell evidence and reports offered at seid hearing, does find and determine the following
' facts:
1. Thet the petitioner requests e variance from the Anaheim Municipel Code, as follows:
~ 1. SECPION 18.28.050(5-b) - Maximum buiidin~ height within 150 feet of R-A
zoned property. (One-story permitted; two-stories
? ~ proposedj
2. SECTIOIQ 18 28.050Sii-a-5j - Code requi.rement that access to carports be from
tne alle~ onlv. (The applicant is proposing access
to ~ouch Street)
i; 2. That Che petitioner proposes to construc[ a 14-unit one and two-s[ory apartment
complex.
~' 3. That there are exceptional or exCraorGi:nr= circumstances or conditior.; app''.icable
to the property involved or to the ir:tended us~: of the proper~y that do not appiy generally
to the property or class of u~e iri the same vi~:init~- and zone.
4. That the requested variance is necessary for the preservatlon and enjo~ment of a
suhstantial propertyri.ght po5sessed by utiier pi•operry in the same vicinit~ ar.d zone, and
I denied to the property in question.
S. That the requested variancE will no- be ma~eriall~y detrimental La the public welfare
~' or injurious to the propert} or improvements in such vicinity ard zone ir whi~h the properr}-
~ ' is located.
~~}~
Vl-D
-1-
1. :.~~i." ~`r
~~
~c ~.~
I
t ~
i
i .
~ .
I
t
" A. The last recorded ins~- •ment •porting to transfer title to said real F ~rty ~
•2. RALPH R. WHEATOY ana~_,cTIL~E WHEATON, husband and wife as joint tenants ~~ deed
recorded February 21, 1950 in Book 1972 page'212 of Official Records as to ~cel 1,
and by deed recorded August 13, 1952 in Book 2369 page 389 of Official Recoz~iu as to
Parcel" 2.
T, ~Y }-~,-
~~,,..~~ ~~ F~ .''_.;_, c;
-~.V i~ r,
B. There are no mortgages or deeds of trust which purport to affect said real property, other ihan" ~~
thuse shown below under Exceptions. ,
No yuarantee is made regardin9 any liens, claims of lien, defects or encumbrances other than those specificaliy provided '
for above, and, if information was requested by reference to a s:reet address, no guarantee is made that said real property
is thc same.as said address.
~ Exceptions: ~`-~~' ~
~ . ~~.
o-; . ~
~~ .
" NOYE.
1;~ ~~ - .
~ cu~`y - ,+/
~ VARIA;~x~^:_ .,'~: ~ Z-ZZ
- - z~
city of Anaheim, described 3°, LOIIOF73: •
• Be~inning at the Southe~sterly corner of the Westerly rectan~ular 1/2 0£ Lot 4 of
' the Orchard Par:c Tract, Map Book 1 page 6 of Atiscellaneous Maps, records of Orange
~ County, California; ar.d running thencc 4lesterl~* along the Southerly line of said
lot 55 feet~;,ttiencc ?~orthcrly in a straight line to a point in the Northerly line
of said lot,(bein~ a point in the South line of South Street as ahown on said Map),
which said point is 60 feet Tdesterly measured along said P7ortherly line of Said
lot from the Northencterly corner of said 4Jesterly rectangular 1/2 of said lot;
~' Cheace E~sterly along thc ~ortherly line of said Lot 6Q feet to the Northeasterly
corner; thencc Southeriy along the Easterly line of BII~d k'esterly rectangular 1/2
j; 's3?.98 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning.
I PARCEL 2:
i. :
i :;
~: All that certain property situated in the State of Caliiornia, County of Orange,
j.-' city of Anaheim, described as foilows:
Beginning at the Southeasterl.y corner of the 4?esterly rectanT,ular one-half of lot
i, ~ 4 of the Orchard Pa.-k Tract, as shown on a nap recorded in Book7, Page 6 of Miscell-
;~ ' aneous Maps, records of Orange County, California; and running thence Westerly
along thc Southcrly line of said Lot 4, SS feet to the tru~ point of beginnin~;
thence continuin~ alon~ said Southerly line 29.50 feet; thence North 15° 19' OS"
,~ ' 41est 3G3.03 feet, raore or less, to a point in the Norther.ly line of Lot 4, said
'~ a ; point being South 7G° 30' 00" West 84.50 fcet from the Northeasterly c~rner of t_he
y~ „~ Westerly rectangular one-half of said Lot 4; thence North 74° 30' 00" East along
~ said Northerly line 24.50 feet; thence Southcrly 308.08 feet, more oz less, to the
+ ~- truc point of be~inning. '
~ ,
_ _, _ _ ._
, _ . _ _____
~ ~~ ~' ' ) }
~ . • ~_ - -
~ .
~~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thst the Aneheia City Planning Commission does hereby grant subject
Petition for Variance, upon the fo~lowing conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to tlie pro-
posed use of the subject property in orc'er to preserve the safety and general welFare of the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim.
; 1. That this variance is gran~ed subject to the completion of Reclassification No.
70-71-19.
~ 2. That subjec.t property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans
and specifications on file with tr.e City of Ar.aheim, marlced Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2, Revision
i .Vo. 1.
' THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epproved by me this 24th day of December, 1970.
;
; ( /~... /
~
, __ ~ ~ ~ ,
_ i; ~ i ~ .-~ ~
'-" CHAi 1AN ANAHEII7 CITY PLANNING COAIMISSION
; ATTEST:
I ~ ; ' ~ ~--~~ / ~/.~UL'C(.C,~I~f1
SECRETARl~1NAHEIM CITY LANNING COMMISSION
` ~ " Pra-tem (/
i..~
!- ;{ STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
t i, COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
i , CITY OF ANAHEIM )
~1 j I, P.nn Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission ot the City of Anaheim do here
" by certify that the fore-
? going resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City planning Commissi~n otthe City of Anaheim, held on
December 14, 1910, at 2:U0 o'clock P.M., by the Eollowing vote of the members thereof:
~;~ AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Parano, Gauer, 4erbst, Kaywood, Rowland, Seymour.
' ~ ~ ~ NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Pione.
F~
~' I .,~ ABSENT: COMMlSSIONERS: Nune.
i
r.
' ~ IN WITNESS WHFREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 24th day of December., 1970.
€ . '+
t` ;a .~~~ ~~-t,-(~'.l'.J-•%/
'" ; a~ SECRETARY~ANAHEIM CIT~',~PLANNING COMMISSION
t: Pro-tem
S RESOLUTION NO. 223
~~ '.~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V2-G 2.
,~ ~.x '',,F
~