Loading...
PC 70-25f.:: c: ~1 j , 1. i. i. t i ,, ~,' ~:Sr :'f ; '1 j 1 ~ j ~' ~ .. .t RESOLUTION N0. PC70-25 A RESOLUTIdIT OF THE CITY PLANNING COMhlISSION OF THE C;TY OF ANAHEIM TIiAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2156 BE GRANTED WflEREAS, the City Plnnning Commi9sion of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition fot Verience from DR. EDWARD H. ABRP,MS, 517 Dwyer Dr., Anaheim9 Cali.fornia 92801, Owner; BARBARA DURAND, 3240 Santa Maria, Fuli<xton, California 92632, Agent of certain real. property situated in the City of Rnaheim, County of Orar.ge, State of California, described as I_ot No. 31 of Tract No. 2838. j ~d ,,, ~ , ~~ a ir?I <elx WHEREAS, tho City Plenning Commission did hold e public heeting at the City Hall in the City of Aneheim on Februdry 25~ 1970~ et 2:00 o'dock P.M., notice of said public hearinL having been duly given as required by law end in accordance with the provisione of the A~neheim Municipel Code, Chapter 18.68, to hear and consider evi- dence for end egainst said proposed veriance a~d to investigete and meke findings aad recommendetions in rnnnection therewith; and WHEREAS, seid :.;ommiasion, after due inspection, investigetion, tmd study mede by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of ell evidence and reparts offered at said hearing, does find end detecmine the fc::c:eing facta: 1. 'Ihat the petitioner requests a veriance from the Meheim Municipel Code as follows to construct tnree additions to an ex.isting residential structuxe on subject property. a. SECTION 18.20.030(2-a~ - Minimum required side yard. {8 feet required; 5 feet proposed). b. S ECTION 18.20.030(3-a) - Minimum required rear Yard. (25 feet required; 20 feet Nroposed). 2. Thet there are exceptional or extraordinory circumslances or conditions epplicable to the property involved or to the intmded use of the property thet do not epply generelly to the property or cless of use in the same vicinity and zune. 3. Thet the requested vsriance is ~ecessery for the preservation and enjoyment of e substentiel pmptrty d~t possesaed by other propetty in the seme vicinity aad zone, and denied to the propetty in question. 4. Thet the caquested variance will not be moterially detrimentel to the public welfere or injurious to the prop- erty ot improvements in such vicinity nnd mne in wkich the prop~rty is located. 5. That since the existing structure already has 5-foot sideyard setbacks and the proposed structural projection into the required rear yard is insignificant the requested vzriances should not prove deleterious to suirounding properties. 6. That one per.son appeared in opposition to encroachment to within 20 feet of his property line. V 1-G -1- t;. ra ~ ~ 1 ~ s ; ~ ~ t Y ~j S~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOi.VED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission doe:: hereby grant subject Petition for Varience, upon the following conditions which are hereby found 4o be a necessary prerequisite to the pro- posed use of the subject property in oraer to presecve the safety end general welface of the Citizens ofthe City of Anaheim. :. That subiect property shall be developed substantially in accordance wi;:h plar.s and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2. \.~ THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved y me this 5th d~\ of Marc , 1970. .f , ~ ` ; \ ~ CH IRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION i ATTEST: ~!,~ •/--- ~ / ~,,;~ L~L- ~I..,L,7~t, ~ / ~ G "'L ~. :':,{ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION '::{ ~~ STATE OF CALIFORNI~+ ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. I CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I~ Ann Krebs ~ Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify thet the fore- ~ going resolution was passed end adopted at e meeting af the City planning Commission of the City oE Anaheim, held on • February 25, 1970~ at 2;00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof: ~ AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allr~d, Camp, Faranc, Gauer, Thom, Rowl.and. ~{ , ~ ' NC~ES: COMMISSIONERS: None. - i, ' ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Herbst. :. + 'f I IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 5th day o: March~ 1970. J L-~~t_- ~c~C•~- /~ '/Y" SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 25 ~, V2-G .2_ ~~~~ ~ r ' . . F