PC 70-9, ._ ~ ~
~
RESOLUTION N0. PC70-9
A KESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CTTY OF ANAHEIM
' RECU~9MENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH TY OF ANAHEIM THAT
~~ PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 69 ~~~~ gg q~ .,; ;~~~.~ i~' ?ART
WHEREAS, the Ciry Counc ~.i p~ the i:~t~ of P.r.~f,eim did ir~itiate ;,:~.,•;_ ;~_,; ~ r
iic::]<,sr ~," --t.i.;n on certain real pxoperty situated in the City of Anaheim, County~o: Orange,
State of California, des~ribed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto ar.d referred to herein as
though set forth :n full.
~ Prooerty owners
Mr. Lloyd A. Burrows
Florence Burrows
William Tokar
A1wyn Broaddus
Al.ice Emery
John Konzal
Evelyn Spires
Carl Skov
Alua Allen
John Kunney, et al
Ben Enloe
.Ax
; and
WHEREAS, the City planning Commission did hold o public hearing at the City Hell in the City of Anaheim
on Jan. 2;:,, 1970, a~ 2;pp o'clock P.M. notice of said public hearing having been duly given es required by
law and in eccordance with the provisions oE the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.72, to hear ond consider
evidence (or and against said proposed reclassification end to investigete andmake findings endrecommendetions
in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itselE and in its be-
half, and a(ter due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the
tollowing facts:
1. Thatthe C:ily i;~,;nci!. ero•~oses a re~:lassi:ication oi tne a}:o~~e described property
from the C-1, G~~reral Commercial, Zone to the R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone :c:
Portion A"; and R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone to the C-1, General Commercial,
Zone for Portion "B".
2. Th'at in an attempt to assist the property owners in this area in expandina
their existing multiple family residential uses without each owner having to file a
separate variance petition, subject petition was initiated.
3. That the Anaheim General Plan - 1970, projects subject properties for co:nmercial
uses, therefore, only a portion of the proposed reclassification is in conformance
with the General Plan. •
4• That the proposed reclassification of Portion "A" of subject property is not
necessary and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community.
5. That three persons appeared, representing owners of 9 of the 10 parcels com-
prising Portion "A", noting that they were unalterably opposed to the muitiple family
residential zoning, since they had purchased the property as a long term investment
for commercial development at some future date, and they requested that the existing
zoning on Portion "A" remain unchanged. Furthermore, two letters were received from
adjoining property owners also in opposition to the proposed reclassirication of Portio~
~~A~~~
6. That the owner of Portion "B" had indicated he had purchased the two C-1
parcels southerly of his property in order to provide addii:ional parking for the restaurant
'~ located on Portion "B" and he did not want the G 1 zoning changed to R-3, since he ~~rould
~~ not be able to use the property for commercial parking; however, he was in favor of
changing the zonin~ on Portion "B" from R-3 to C-1 in order t.o establish a~propriate
zoning for the existing restaurant.
RD
-1-
~
SU3JECT: Legal description of four parcels of land located at the east
side of Anaheim Blvd. between Vermont and Lorraine Drive.
PARCEL OI~E •
,~-~ ~T~~'Flr'' ' `~-' " ^ '.
That nortion of Lot 25 of Ar.aheim Extension, in the City o£ Atiaheim, ~'ounty
of Orange, State of California, as shown or. a Map or Survey made by Wil.liam
FIamel and filed in the office of the County Recorder of Los Angeles County,
California, a copy of which is shown in Book 3, page 163 et seq., entir_led
"Los Angeles County Maps , records of said Orange County, described as
Pollows:
t
~
..
Beginning at the northeast corner of Lot 1 of Tract No. 12~5, as per Map
recorded in Book 43, page 27 of ~~Ziscellaneous Mags, in *_he office of the
County Recorder o= said Or.ange County; thence Soutr 74° 28' 00" West 136.00
feet to the east line of Los Angeles Street, now known as Anaheim Boulevard,
as shown on said map; thence North 15° 32' 15" West 67.00 feet to the inter-
section of said east line with the south line of Vermont Avenue, as shown on
said map; thence Narth 74° 28' 00" East 136.00 feet to the northerly pro-
longation of the aast line of said Lot 1; thence South 15° 32' 15" East 67.00
~eet to the point of beginning.
Said land is shown on a Map Eiled in Book 25, page 49 of Record of Surveys,
in the office of the County Recorder of said county.
PARCEL TWO•
Trat portion of Lot 25 of Anaheim Extension, in the City of Anaheim, County
or Oraage, State of Cali.fornia, as shown on a Map of Survey macie by Ulilliam
Hame1 and filed in the office of the County Recorder of Los Angeles County,
California, a cooy of which is shown in Book 3, page 163 et seq., entitled
"Los Angeles County Maps", records of said Orange County, described as
=ollows:
The southerly 65 feet of the northerly 777,62 feet of Lot 25 0= Anaheim
Extension as shown on a Map of Survey made by William Hamel in 1868 ~nd
filed in the office of the County Recor.der of Los Angeles County in said
State of California.
EXC~PT Th"EREFROM any portion thereof lying within Los Angeles Street, now
known as Anaheim Boulevard.
PARCEL THREE•
Part of Lot 25, Anaheim Er.tension, as per survey by William Hamel in 1868
filed in the o£fice of the County Recorder of Los Angeles, California, more
particularly described as follows:
Bcginniny at a point in the center of Los Angeles Street, now the State
Iiighway, no~•~ known as Anaheim Boulevard, said point being loaated 637.87
feet Soutn 15° 30' ~ast from a concrete monument marking the intersection
of the cente.:line of said .Los Angeles Street, now known as Anaheim Boule-
vard, and Vermont Avenue, said paint beir.g the southwest corner of that
cerLain parcel of land describec~ in deed recorded October 13, 1943, in
Boo}c 1218, page 132, Official Records of Oran e Count California; ruaning
thence nerth 73° 42' 40" East 193.55 fect along the south line of said
parcel anci the easterly e;~tension thereof; thence South 15° 30' East 74.75
feet along a line parallel to the said centerline of Los Angeles Screet now
known as Rnaheim Boulevard; thence South 73° 42' 40" West 193.55 feet parallel
~ to the South line of above described parcel to a p~int in the centerline of
Los Anyeies Street, now known as Anaheim Boulevard; thence North 15.°..30' vTest
74.75 ~eet to the ooint of beginning. -~ ,
-'~~~:,.,: '•: ,, U',
EY,CEPTING TiIE?tEr^ROM any portion thereof lying within Los An ~~ es Skre~et ~~now
known as Anaheim Eoulevard. g 1- '
u; !~ ^ ''~!:1 =
~ , .;.
~~:
. .: .
:,. .:
,~?.c.~Ll;ss. I•;t~.~~.~ ` ~,. ~~ ~~ ~~ ~?,~~',
......_ . ~-
__ :.. ~.... . .....,~ ~ . .
Page 1 of 2 :^ `J~'
,: ~/
- ., cc~'~~~
~
~=3C~L FOUR:
?=rce1 ~- Ti,at nortion o:~ iot 25 of Anu e'
o~ Su~vey m~c= by Plilliam Aamel and filed in theeoffice of the47County Re~
corner of Los Angeles County, California, described as follows;
3~:~7ning at a noinc in the centerline of Los Angeles Street, now knowr, as
~n~;eim Bouleva~-d, di~tant taereon, South 15° 30' East 555.05 feet from a
concrete r„or.u;,,ent at the intersection of the centerline of said Los Angeles
S~reet, now k,owr. as Anaheim Boulevard, with the centerline c,f Vermont Avenue,
' S~=d ~oint ~eir.g the northwest corner of the land conveyed to Louis H. Hoskins
• a~• a deed recordeci July 11, 1936, in Book 836, page 263, Official Records,
' a•^.d run, ir.g ti:ence North 74° 30' East alon g the nor t h e r l y line of said land
~ co:^. v~ y ed to T_- ios~ins, 227,g5 feet; thence South 15° 36' 45" East 28.06 feet;
~ize:ce South 74° 27' 47est 34.27 feet to the northeast corner of the land
' co;:veyed to Leize G. Hoskins by a~Eed recorded September 19, i950, in Book
~~7`, ?are =?6, 0=~icial Records; t:'~ence South 15° 30' East, ulong the
easterly line cr said land conveyed to fiosk~ns, 5?.p7 feet to tne r.ortheast
ecr„er o~ ~he lar,d conveyed to Willian George lokar and wi~e by a deed re-
corcie3 Septenbar 1p, 1gqg~ in Boo;c 1698, page 440, Of=icial Records; t"rience
Sout~ 73° ~.?~ ~p~~ West along the nortnerly line o~ said land conveyed •_o
='oh~-, 193, » ~eet to a point in ,`.he center.line o~ said Lcs Angeies Street,
<~~~•~ ?cnown as A:?aneim 3oulevard; tnence \'crth 15° 30' West alcng said center-
line, 62,62 ~eet•to the paint o£ beginning.
E\CEp•_y~G mF,r,~,g~0:~i the ~oilo~aing: Beginr.ing at a noint in the no-rtherly
!i:.e of sa~d la,d conveyed to Hoskins, ~istant therenn North 74° 30' Last,
193.53 ~e2t ~rom the northwest corne-r r.hereo~ ar.d thence continu~;,g alcng
said nor~nerly 1iae, \Torth 74° 30' East, 34.32 feet to the n~rtneast corner
o= ~ne land conveyed to Leize G.
in 3ook 1.218, page 132 ~oskins by a deed recorCed October 13 1943
, O~~icial Records; thence South 15° 36' 45" East along
Lne easterly line o= said land conveyed to Hoskins, 2g,06 ~eet; tnence Soutn
~' ~~° 27' TnTest 34.37 feet; tnence North 15° 30' West, 2g,41 feet to the point
o~ beg~nnino,.
a_,.,,~
~1 B- Beg_nnir.g at a point in tne centerline o~ Los Angeles Street, now
kno:•m as Anaheim Boulevard, distan~ thereon, South 15° 30' East, 555,p5 ieet
=:om a concre~e monu~nent at the
intersec~io;1 of the cencerline o~ saia Los
angeles S~ree~, now knotan as Anaheim ~ouleva-rd with the centerline of V?r.nont
` r?ver.uc-, saic poi~~ being the northwest co•rne-r of the land conveyed to Louis
=i• Eos{i.r.s by a deed recorded Ju1y o~, 193G in Book 836, page 263, O~~icial
Recor6s and rur.ning ~hence \orth 7~ 30 East along the nortnerly line o~
said ~and conv~ycd to Hoskins, 193.53 feet to a point in tne cvesterly iine
o= an al"!ey, 20.00 f.eet in width as shown on a N,ap of Tract A'o. 12~5, recorded
. 1.I7 i00iC ~,e~~~ ~~CJ2S 20 a11(j 27 OL i•liscellaneous Naps; thence ~~ortn lj° ,~,2~ 15~~
i•Jes~ along sa:.c o-~esteriy line, 3.00 fECL to the southeast cor*~e•r o~ Lot 6 of
~a:G `".ract; tner.ce South 74° 27' 45" Wes~, along the s;o~.~t?~erly line of said
Lot c and the westerly proicngation th~reof, 193.53 f~er. to the centerline
of said Los Angeles Street, now known as Anaheim Bouievard; thence Soutn
1~` 30' :as~ along said centerline, 3.00 feet to the pnint of beginning.
~`tCL'T=~G 1n~R.?rRO. any pc,rLion thereof lying withi,: Los Angales Street, ;,ow
known as Anaheim Boulevard.
~
i^~:,~,i..ii~,. ~':U. ~ `I ~ `~~ , ''`' .~-~~
. ~. ..~:~.. .~'.'.. _. .......... ~
` ~ ___!-~' ,~
Page 2 0~ 2
~i3 ,~ 13;s
1
i,~p 1~_
~~ . ~:
~/~'` F ~~,;^ ;~~J ~~_.
c~ ; ? v
~N i~• , .., I
\ y~/ ~
\___. =~~
~
c
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hereby recommer~d to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that subject Pe±ition for
' Reclassification of Portion "A" be disapproved, on the basis of the foregoing findings.
BE IT FURTHER RFS OLVED that the Anahein City Plannina Commission does hereby
recommend to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that sub~ect petition fOr Heclassi-
fication for Portion "B" be appro••~ed and, by so doing, that Titl? 18-Zoning of the
Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above described property from the R-•3,
Multiple Family R?sidential, Zone and to incorporate said described property into the
C-1, General Commercial, Zone, upon the follo~ing conditions which are hereby found to
T~ ' be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject property in order to presen~e
the safety ar.d gen?ral ~a•elfare or the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
a Portion "B" only:
d i. I'hat the ownerfs; of subject property shall deed to the City o; Anaheim a 15-
foot radius property lire :etu:n at Anaheirn Boulevard and !~ermont Avenue.
2. That the o~r~ner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of P.naheim the sum
of $2.00 per front foot along Anaheim Boulevard, Vermont Avenue, and 'ta~ri~~•~ , for
street liahting purposes.
3. That the owner(sj of subject pzoperty shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum
- of 15¢ per front foot along Anaheim Boulevard, Vermont Avenue, and Lorr-~s~A~~ce, for
tree plantiny purposes.
4, That trash storage areas shzll be provided in ~~r.coroan~e ~Ni'.h a,oroved pians on
file with the oifice of the Director of Publir Works.
5. That all air-conditioning facilities shall be o~opurly shielded f*om view.
ci. That pxior to the introd~.iction of an ordinance rezonino =_ubj?ct property,
Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3. 4, and 5, above ment:oned, shall be comF,leted. The ~,rovisions
or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the City
Council unless said conditions ere complied tvith witiiin 190 days from the date hereof or
such further time as the City Counc:il may grant.
THE FOREGOING RESGLUTIOtJ is signed and ~ppi•oved by me ihis 3th day of February,
1970.
\ I
~ ~J/S~' /
CHA MAPJ AIdAHEIAI CITY PLA;IIING COA;hS1SS IGN
- ATTES T:
~~ys'-z.,.<_ ~ T~1~' -.~~.a~
SECRE'PARY ANAHEIM C17Y PLARNIWG COMMISSIOhJ
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ;
COUNTY OF ORANGE 1 ss.
CITY OF ANAyEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of knaheim,
~ do hereby certify that the foreaoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
I the City Planning Cornmission of tl'~e City of Anaheim, held on January 26, ;970, at
~ 2:00 0'cloc'•; P,AS,, by the follotving vote of the members thereof:
I AYFS: C0~14~~;ISSIONL-RS: Allred, Camp, Farano, Gauer, Thom, Rov:land.
. NOES: COPdJJ~ISSIOVERS: None.
A~FfJl: COM,h1ISS10IJERS: Herbst.
i
IN VJI7T;ESS WfiERLOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3t:h day of February, 19%0.
i. {
; /~ ~ ,
~ _ ~/ ~ L i ! . ~~ ,'~i I ,.-' .~~~ , ,.
~ SECRETARY APIAHEIM CITY FLAIdNIh1G CGN~AS?SSICN
I
Res. No. 9
4'~l
'{ `~
!
;' I af~
~