PC 71-114~
,._ _... _. ._.
? ,
,_ _
Eti;SOLUTION N0. PC71-_ 114
A 12~SOLUTIUN OF' T}iL CiTY PLANNING COMMISSION Ur THE CITY OF ANAH~IM CLART.FYING
T1,E TNTLNT OE TI~G COMMISSION AS TO THE llSE PEE2MrTTED IN TtI1;II2 ORIGINAL
APPROVAL ~r CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0, 658, THERCTO
W11Elt~AS, rhe Anaheim Cicy Planning Coimniasion in Etesolution No, 1446, Seriea 1964-65,
dated December 7, 1464, did grant Condztional Uae i~ermit Ho, 65o Co establish A church and
Christian education facilitiea; and
~; WHEREAS, the Planning Commiesion on May 17, 1971, received A request fr~,~ the
S Tr~niCy Lutheran Church for c).arification of. the planning Commisaiun's inrent in
~''k ~ ~pt~r~ving Christian education facilities to detercnine whether iL included a
~;.~ for kin~ergarten thru eighth ~rades, since it was their ic~ daY echool
~! achool Eor 120 students; c~nd tent to estaUlish such a
~
~~" WH~REAS, the Planning Commisaion detezmined that auch a clari.ficaGion should be
{~r.~ considezed at an advertised public heuring; And
1`~ WH~REAS, the City planning Commiasi.on did hold a public hearing at the City llall
in the City of Anat~eim on June 2, and June 1 4, 19 7 1, a t 2: 0 0 o'c loc k P.M.~ notice of
sai d pu b l ic hearing having been duly giv~n 3s required by ].aw and in accordance with
the provisions of the Anatieim Muntcipal cude, Chapter 18.64, to hear and consider
evidence fnr and a~,ainst sa,td proposed conditional ~~se and to invesrigate a»d make
findings nnd recommendations in connection therewitti; and
WHEREAS, said ~.,,.,,,iission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideratic~n of all evidence and reports
offered at said 'hearing, does find end determine the fullowing facts:
1. That it W2•S the intent of rhe Planning Commisaion to include a Christian
d~y school r~s a permitted use of sub3ect property, since it was an accepte~
norma'1. procedure for a parochial school to be built at the time the church
was financially able to provide a school,
2. That the maximum number of students should be 120 incluei.ve of all grades
propose:l,
~,
~
P
,,;
k
~ _
~ ~a
3. That the existing entrance-exit on Church Havsn Drive shou3~d be removed and
replaced with standard curb ~nd gutter, L•o insure the privacy of the 2xisting
cul-de-sac street.
4. That although the use was a permitted on~, additional safeguards should be
provided for the adjacent singie £amily homes from the li.ghts oL vehicles
arriving and leaving the church parking area, and from normal children's
noise~ during play time and lunch, by the provisi~n of dense landscaping
along the north and east praperty lines.
5. ThaC c.onsiderat_on by rhe City Council should be given to providing a
four-way stop end a crossing guard at the intersection of Nohl Ranch and
Nohl Canyon Roads, sitlcQ a public elementary school, now being cor.structed on
the s~uth side of Nohl Ranch Road, would serve children residing on the north
side of said road and the existing posted speed was too great for children to
accurately judge when it was safe to c.ross the street.
6. That seven persons representing rwenty persons in the Council Chamber at
both hearings ;ppeared in apposition, an-? tnat a showing of hands ind:tcated
that 15 persons were present in favor of the Christian dAy school.
~., .:_- ,
.,.._.,a . ~ ,~.~~
_ .». ~~ <, - . ' w .~A' ia. . ~--- -•~
~
h
..
( , ,~
NOW, THCREI~OR~, I3C IT RESOLVF;D that the Anaheim City Planning Commiasion does hereby
clarify ita inten~ in approving a church with Chriatian edUCakion Eacilities, thst ir
included tlle ea~ablishment of a day achool on sub~ect property.
d~ IT FURTH~R R~SOLVED in ~~r•der thaC the day school will be more compatible wit:h thp
reside~itta]. us~s, the followii~b conditione are deemed necessary Co implemenl• aaid
compatibiliry•
1. That the exiating atructure sha11 be Urousht up to the minimum standards of. the
City of Anaheimy including the Uniform Building, Plumbing, I;lectrical, Hausing, Mechani.cal
and I~ire C.aes ae adopted by the City ot Anaheim, prtor to the commencemen:: of the
activity authorized under this resolutton,
2. Thal. ehe existing dxiveway on Church Fiaven Way shall be barricaded immed~ately to
preclude church traffic from using Churclt Naven 41ay.
3. That the exiating driveway appr.oach apron and.entrance-exit ro Churcli Haven Way
shall be remover~ and replaced with standard curb and gutrers.
4. That a 42-inch decoral•ive masonry wall andJor dense landscaping shall be provided
alung the entize frontage of ChuYC:h Haven Way; plans for said wal]. and/or landscaping ::hall
be submitted to the Dev~topment Services Department for approval.
5. That ciense lands~eping, including trees, ahall Ue provided along Che easterlv
property line ad,jacent to the area proposed for recreation purposes; plans Eor said land-
scaping to be sub~nitted to the Development Services Deparl•ment for approval.
6. That CondiLion Nos. 3, 4, and .5, above mentioned, shall be compliP~i with withici
180 dayq from date hereof or such further time as the Planning Commission and/or City
Council may grant, provided however, that the commencement oL the school use shall not be
dependent upon completion of these cunditions,
7. That aub,ject property shall be developed substantiAlly in accordance wirh plans
and speciEications on file with khe City ~f Anaheim, marked Exhi.bit No. 1, Revision No. 1,
ar.d Exhibit Nos. 2, 3, and 4, in addition to the conditions set forth above.
8, That a maximum of 120 students shall be permttted in the Christian day school.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved v me.thi 24 d~; J~ ne, 1971.
. CHA ??MAN ANAH~ M CTTY PLt1•~;~ NflcN~ COMMTSSIO
ATTE ST. . N
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
;~i COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
,;; CITY OF ANAH~~:~1 )
' ;;
'r,
.:~:' I, Ann Krebs, Secrelary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do
~;; hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the
~~;; City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on June 14, 1971, at 'L:OG 0'clock
;"s;: P.M,, by the following vote of the mpmbers thereof:
;,
;Y
';;:ti AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, G~uer, Herbst, Kaywood, Rowland, Seymour,
:~
'~ NOES: CObfMISSI0D1ER5: None.
,;.
~i
;i ABSGNT: COMMISSIONERS: None.
'~ ABSTAIN: rOMM'ISSIONERS: Carano.
I ~`.~
;-~
''~ IN WITNBSS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 24th day of June, 1971.
I ~~
I ;~~
..•
~ SECRETARY ANAHE'IM TY pL~P7NING CUMMISSION
., ,s~.
,'~ Res, N~. 114
*
~
- . ..,,,
-~: ~
~
~