PC 71-144RESOLUTION N0, j'~_ ~ 1- ~4k
A RESOLUTION QF THE CITY PLANNING GOMM1SS14N OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR YARIANCE N0. 22 78 BE DENIED
, ,~
~;
'.`~i
;s'
+`~
'!
:~
y~
~~
`~
`,y
~4~
;~
'.7
;~1
~'i
t'c
:
,~
i`
~ r;
;~
~,
;
i -~!
:''~
~s
~
I ?,;
I ..iY
WNEREAS, the City Plaanina Commla~ion of the City of Anaheim did receive e verified Petltion for Vnriance from
MOBIL OII, COltI'OI2ATION, 9901 S, pera-nount, Downey, i:ic~lifnrnia 90240, Owner; Cf:NLItA~
MAIN`PEIVANCE, INCOttPORATED, 11372 Western Avenue, ScenCpii, i:alitornLA 90680, t„~~~ : pJ. ~~ECtA~ll
real properl•y situated in the City of Anaheim, Count, of UrAnge, State ~f Cali.lo~: i.a.
described as that portion of Lot 5 i.n 131ock ~ of 'Cracl ,io, 13, as per map r.e~:orded ln Book
9, Page 12 of Miscellaneous Mapa, rec~rds of said Co~~nly, [~eginntng at the :~o~itl~west ~urner
of said Lot 5, said Southwest corner being the poii~c of fntersection of L-hP cer~ter'11i~e ~~f
Brookhurat Street, with the cent•erline of UrAnSe Avenuc., as shown an a map Ciled lii P,oolc t32,
page 14 oE Records of. Surveya i.n the o.flce of the Cuun~y Recorder of said County; th~i~ce
Pdortli 89° 29' 36" Gast elong [he Southerl;~ line ot: auid Lut 5 A diatance ot 210.01 t'eN~;
thence North ].° 05' S6" Wesr 182.01 f'eet to a potu~ Ln cl~e Northerly line of the Soutnerly
182.00 £eet of said Lot 5; thence 5outh 89° 29' 36" Wesl along said Northerly 11ne 205.99
feet L•o a F~oin[ in the Westerly line of said Lot 5; chence aouth 0° 09' S$" Weat alung said
Westerly line 182,01 f~et to the point of beginni~~~g.
WHEREAS, the Clty PlanninF Commiealon d:~f hold e public hearing et the City Hell In the City of Aneheim on
Ju"ly 26, 1971, at lO:OQ q~clock A.M. noi~ce oE setd public hearing havinq been duly given as required by
law end in acoordence with the provieiona of the Anaheim Municipal Co~e, Chepter 18.68, to heer and consider evidence for
end ageinat said proposed varie~ce and to investiQate and make findings end re~ommendations in connection therewith;
end
WHEREAS, said CommisaIon, after due ingpection, investigaiion, and study made by itself and in tts behalf,
end eftee due conaideretion uf all evidence and reporta offered at said hearing, does find Pnd determine the following
facts:
1. Thet the petitioner requests a var;ance from the Aneheim Municipel Code :
similar
5,
a. SGCTION 18.62,090(B-1 ) - Ivur;+:er. ol' I ree-standin~ sikns permitted.
(Une f*ep-~ra~ding sign permitted; two nrop~sed),
.7 pe ~.tton woul~ es~ abl ~ sc. a undesirable precedent ei~c.oi~ra~ing
requests irom the other oil compan.ies.
That signing of the existin; service staLio~~s adver~is'• h
and
b. SCCT7UN 18.62,090513-2j -;linim~.im :ie~i;~~of_a Iree-sl•andinq si.~n. (;~
teet rey«ireci; 7 feet, 3 inches pz•oposed;.
2. That the petitione* has not demonstrated a c;ardship existed to warrant favcr;able
consideration of r.he waivers r e q u e s~ e d.
3. That granting suhject petition wo~~ld be ;rar.:inc; a privilege not granted co service
stations of the other oil companies.
4. That approval of aub'ect t' '
~~~~~e aways made it ve~- difffcu?.;..tb readily identify service stAtionsmasisuchrwithoutry
~v~.zg another sign on the premises,
6. That a~y hardship that mighC res~~:l~~ if su~~jec~ peticion were denied wo~..ld be a
se1L'-:mposed hardship.
'1. That Ctie applicaat should approacl~ tlie pre!~lem of si.~;ning in a manner w;t:c:h would
:-~~t@grate all signing on one pole sign, rather. t_ian c.or,s.icleri.ng advertising each service
oc product on an individual signing hasis.
~ 'rk
"'' V 1-D
:j; -1-
~ :
"~
>~
~ :-:~
~
I ~
~k
~
11
., ~~ ~
w.~..~a rN'/r 1N~ ~!.r[rtL~4'eh*c'-~~
, ... ~
/
.._ .... . J.~ '' Y h ~
~
IV
~ ~~ j •
~
~ ~ ~~~ ~
NOW, THEREFOI2E, BE TT RESOLVED thet the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby deny subJect
Petition for Varience on the besLa o; the eforementioned Elndings,
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION ls signed and approved by me this 5th day of August, 1971.
~
~l~l~'~'
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING f;OMMISStON
i ATTEST:
~j
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COtdMISSION
i
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF' ANAHEIM )
i
~ I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foce-
going resolution was passed and adopted et a meeti.ng of the City Planninq Commission of the Ci4y of Anaheim, held on
July 26, 1971, 10:00 0' clock A,M, by the following vote oE the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Kaywood, Seymour.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
~ ABSENT: CQMMISSdONERS: A11red, Rowland.
i IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunio set my hand this Sth day of August, 1971.
L~f/`Q~
, SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
i ~ ~,
RESOLUTION N0. 144
V2-D
-2-
~
~
..~~~-}I
~..e.:
._
~•p°~l"~Y.; -- - . , . ,
!~ , ,
~