PC 71-164!
' ~ RESOLUTI~"`~NO. PC71-164
, ~.,,,._
A RCSOLUTIUN OF T~(E CITY F~LANNING CUMMISSION 0~' TFiE CITY Or ANAWEIM
' TNA'f PETITiON FOR CONDITIONAI, USE PCF2MIT 1248 BE DEIVIGD
~;
~,
r,
" WHCREA5, the City PlanninR Commission oE the Ctty of Anahelm dld receive a verlEied Petition Eur Con-
dltionel Use Permit Erom LA SAI.LE EIOT~L COMPANY, a Missouri Corporat.i.on, 8730
~: Wilshiro L~oulevard
, SuitP 410, }3evRrly Ilills, California 90211 Ownerj
N• ~• ~ARLET~'A, NATTONAL STGRRA PICTCrRES CURPQRATION, 105 South Prospect
Avenue, Tur~tin, California 92680, Agent, of certain real pro ert si.tu t
~ Y a ed
~ in the City of Anzthelm, County of Orange, State of California, described
~ in Cxhibit "A" attached hereto and referred to herein as though set forth
~' in full
~
r
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim
on A ttg us t 2 3, 19 71 , at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing having been duly given
as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal code, ChHpter 18.64, to hear
and consider evidence Eor and ageinst said proposed conditional use and to investigate end make Eindings and
recommendations in connection therewith; and
i`.
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection; investigation, and study made by itself end in its be-
~ half, and after duz consideration of all evidence and reports ofEered at said hearing, does find and determine the
j ; following facts:
„i
1. Thnt the proposed use is properly one Eor which a Conditional Use Permit is authorized by Code
Secti~n 18,64~020~3-j) to permit a motion ~icture studio and related tourist-
oriented attractions, and Section 1$~52,05p(~-g)~ to permit a restaurant and
; cocktail loung~~ with waiver of:
,
ao ~ECTION 18,62, O~B-2) - Maximum hei~ht of a free-standin si n, ~83
ee proposed~ eet permitted based~on
distance from sign to center of La Palma
; Avenue)
bo SECTION 1$ 6_ncan(B-~) - Maximum s_i~,n hei ht, (~~ feet per•mitted,
~3 feet proposed
cn SECT'ION 18 62 090(D-4) ~~Max ~ multi-fa e free-standin
I~~P t' '0 square feet permittec', 1 square
feet proposed)
d. SECTIOId 18,62,Oyp(B-5) _ Location of free-standina ^iar~~ ~Sign to be
located in the central 2G,r required~ within
2y feet of the easterly ~.~ruperty line proposed)
~Waiver not necessary if easterly street is
to be publico)
~{' e~ ~SFCTIO_ N 1$~?,~pp(b-1) - Maximi~m sign area in ~h ar ing lan~,~
. ~ -
~:;~ ~r.,(100 square feet maxi.mum permitted;
;;;~ '+y`+~ square feet proposed)
:~
.
~~
2. That over the ye~r~ industrial developments in the nor{heast industrial area
have been guarantsed protec.:tion from the encroachment of non-industrial uses and
these commitments should be upheld.
CI-D
-1-
~
~
3. That base~ upon ~vidence submitted to the Plenni~~g Commtsaion it is felt 1:hat
tho proposed tourist-oriented activities will far exaeed the industrial u~e of this
property.
4, That based upon previcus experience with similar usos in the aouthe~st
industrial area, approval of the proposed tourst-oriented attractions on subj9ct
property would hinder Further industrial development in the northeast industrial
areao
5, That the nor•theast industrial area is going to supply thous~nds of jobs t'ur
this community~ and to permit the encroachment of non-industrial uses into this
established industrial area will deter further industrial devnlopment which in turn
wi:l have an adverse affect upon the future growth of the rest of the communitye
6. That if non-industrial usos are per•mitted to encroach into the industrial ereas~
prospective industrial developers will start baakin~ away fr•rm Anaheim in preferenco
to locations wh~re the int,egrity of industrial zuninQ is maintained.
7, That approvai of tho prop~aed i~ga would probab'.y ~esult in additionsl
simil2r requests and a further deteriora~ion of industrial climate of the northeast
industrial areao
:~, 8. That for a considerable period of time this area 'ias been plannEd for
^`;.;;~ industrial development and tho servic~ facilities provided in the area have been
'f,,~ geared for that in~ustrisl development~ and to inject non-industrial uses into the
';~ area would require cons~derable reeveluation of these serv~^e facilities.
;~:
~~ 9, That the bsst buffer betweon industrial and non-industrial uses is space~
!~ and the existin~ freeways border:n~ port;ons of the northeast industrial ar~as pro-
t vid~: this type of sep~ration. If non-industrial uses are allowed to encroach into
~ the~ northeast indus•krial area, these desirable buffering devices will no longer
ser•ve this current function.
l0e That the proposed tourist-oriented uses ~~ld be incompatible with
industrial uses established in and projected for this area and would be more
appropriately located i~ the commercial recreation areae
11. That the proposed use wi11 adv~rsely affect the adjoining land us~s and the
~,rowth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be lucatcd~
12o Tt~~{ the size and shape of the site pr~oposed for the use is not adequate
to allow tF..: full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to
the par~icul:.:• ared nor to the peace~ health~ safetys and ~eneral wElfare o~ the
Citizens of the City of Anaheime
13, That the grantin~ of the Condi+.ioral U$e Permit will be detrimental to
the peace~ health~ safety~ and general welfare of +,he Citizens of the City of
Anaheim,
RESOLUTION N0. PC~1-164
C2-D
,-;
~ ~
~~
~ ~
w
,ti~~ ~~
~
Y ;~
~1
~' j ~ -,:
~'
~ .
f~ ~
; r ~'~
~~
~ '` ~~
~ I:t:,
"' ,r:•, `, y~ Te~. ~ ~~.+r~ ,
~ie
. _ .... .: ~S
-2-
~ .
rf,
4
~ r
~
«~~ TA~
i
r ~~~
~ ~' Y
i'
i r
,;
l. .;
I
I ~
I
_ , ,
- .i
~,`1.~...:.. /t . jt~ts..i~up~^,.~, . „ .._ . , . . . .
Z
~ ~ [1 ~~ ~:IAY ~
, )
Titlc tu said rslate or intcrest at thc dntc hcrruf is ~~csted in: A2•~:DTL;I',A VL`':~TII~:G ~ June ~.8 ~ 1971
I,A St1~,G~; ItOTFIL COt~i~'AP1X~ a r4iss~~ur~. corE~~~'c~Gian. .
~ ,
. ~~'.~ ~~-7 - -,y , ,
_. _. ..e,.:.. .li..._ fi._ ~~.:~. ; ~ 1
. . :. at
Said land is s.~~.iatcd in thc City~ of Caunty~ uf ~zAt1j;G ~
Statc of C;~lif~ ~::ia, an~l is dcsrribecl as fullo«~s: ~~ ~; ~;:;';;,-.
/ ; , . , _. .,\
sr~ nrsr,~.~z~ixoil r1~cr nr~r,~c~T~:i~. ~"' a' ~";
n v~i; ~~ ~
C' 1~>>j ~
`-. ~'` ~~~~1,.`' ''
' ~ .~ , ~ cn
~ ~> s. ~~1 ~
~~ O~V~~`"' ~'~ ~ aV
: vf •,I ~ ~'" ta
, ~;(S'„ ,,,~``\~~~~
C~)IV~). ~~.~,t_ r.l i1i'ti~i t ~~1J. o~
/---, ~ ._._.._.__. ._.._
~:. . .. . ---.._-..._....__.. ._.~...__. . ~._.._ .. , w ~
. . _ .. . .. . . ..__...... .. .. ... . ...,_.... .._ ... .. . ........ .. .. .. . .... . ....._............. _._...... _- -. . ..._.__. _..... .....» `._ .
~~~ .
~ . ~.
~?~
1', •
~~ ~ DESC^nIP~'ION PAGE O~' PRL'LI~/IINf\F~Y F~'CPOiZ'i-Or~Dr':r2 NO, 'G'~i'Tt,r'•,J~~
I-
~i •
7'he land refeucd to in this rcpart is situated in thc State of CaliEornia, County of
` and is dcsccibcd ~s follows:
~ ~ ~
I, _ -
; Tha~ por~2o:~ o~' LoLz 20 ~.:~d 21 'r,n ~ixoc:t ~C oi LhQ Y.x~~cmex T~ ~e ~
~. 2n ~;~~ aoun~y o~ Or~~n~;e, s ~ai.e o~' C:~li~ er:~•La, a3 pV r m~,~ reco~.~cted
, ~~' ~z~ bao~ ;12, pauea 8~( and a8 0~' ffisce~lar.er,u:s Fec;ord ~, ~n th~ o~ i'~.ce
;, . oi' ~ha oounLy xQCOa~uor oa I,oc An~c~.c: Cou:~~y, Cnl~.i'orn~La, de~cz~3.i~~d
;: , ~ ~ct ~'ol~,acaa: ..
;.
~;.
I' ~~ Bc~;~.x~,~."~~~~ a~ tha moy~ ~rce-~ea~ly coi^,~oa• o~' sµid Lo~ 27.,; thonce P1ort;h
~ • 2E;° 52~ ;;~.~~ Ea ~~ 734.5~', fee~ a~o:~_ t;~o nox~iz~ra~~orly i~.nQ of ~~ic
;• Lo'~ 2~ ~o i~ho cen~e~.11 ~ne o.~ ~ize f•0.00 ~^oof. road convey+:~:z ~o 'cl7a
~ Cu~ij~`c;~ oi Ox~~n ;e, 55- dec~d reeorclec~ P,pri,l 2, 1J1."~, ~.n noo:< 23? ,
p~.z(~,c 2y2 of Deeaa oa n~~.;~ Or~:~ryc Cau:~'cy, ~lYe~~~4e i~Tor~h 'j~° Oa° QO~~
E~~~ ?.C~3.J? reeL a~.onU ~u"~d cea~c.~l~.ne Co Lhc: nor~nr-.a.s~c~xly 1~.ne
, ~ oS' ~a:~d I,o~ 2Z; thc~:zce ~'o,~~h 73° 0~° 00" E~.z~; ~'.~05.52 S'ee~; t:~:cnc~
: ~u'c:~ ~.G° 5~Q 00" L~~'c 5a.00 z"ce~; ~hc:~co uoutih 12° 2~~ ;;~" rzu~,
10~~~,`.0 i'c~e~ ~o ~~~e ~ou~ncr~.y 1~.z;~ of sn;.d Zo~ 21;, ~h~;~c~ Sou~i1
'a7." ~0° 5r~~~ ~1~GL1~`i ~'Y~3.3;~ are;. ~?Ar~` s~S.d wou~y~rly ].2nc t-o an an;;]~e
~oin~; ~he,~ce Nor~h G1° ~1 ~ ~7" t~;e,;;; ~1;;5~~,~9 ~'e~t; ~.lo:~~ t;ha ~c.u~:~-
. tv~c'c~:.•~,~ly x.'~n~-r o+ ~a~.c; Lo;, 21 t-o t-hQ ~o;n~ al bo~~.nn~n~.
a T~{C~F'~.C:C,~~ x'R~~4 ~1 ~cl 1an:~ ~1~, oZ~., ~~s, m9.rl~:~;a7, ~na hy:lr~car~on
~~ i ~ cu'~ti~:~-~ce~ i:1 ~nc~ ~~r.deA~ ~a.id l, i:r1 belo„ ~; v d~~.i;h o.i 500 i'c.~~.,
c•: ~i;:n rao ~~:l~h~ ~o ~u.rf.aco en;:ry ~Y:erUo.z, to~cLaZer v~~.vh a17. .•c;~Lu
t ,
~ "~c~ ~~;~~ a:~d pxoa^~.4~, t;horat'rom ~.; xe :~rvcd ~~ variouV ~1CC~4/ c~ reco~.
(~
~
~V
~~ ~
i
9a~
-'~4; DIOW, THEREFORE, BE YT RESOI.VED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby deny subject
,~i Petition for Conditionel Use Permi+ on the basis of the eforementioned flndings.
;;~ TIiE FOREGOING RESOLUTION i~ signed and approved by me this 2nd day of September, 19'71 .
`~
, ~
i
; ___.._
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CIT~' PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
'
C TARY~ANA IM PLANNING COMMISSION
' nro tem
a
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
C1TY OF ANAHEIM )
pro te~~~
I, Loe Burges~ , Secretarypf the City Planning Commission oE the City of Aneheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
going resolution wes passed and adopted at e meeting of the City Planning Cosnmission of the City of Anaheim, held on
A u g u s t 2 3, 19 71 , at 2:00 o'clock P_M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COM;MISSIONERS: ALLRED~ FARANO~ HERBST~ KAYWOOD~ ROWLAND~ SEYMOUR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: GA UER
,;:; ABSENT: COMiNISSIONERS: NONE
W WITNESS WHEP.10F, I have he:eunto set my hand this ? n~a c~ay o f S e o temb e r, 19 71 .
RESOLUTION NO. P C 71-16 4
~ C3-D
~ ~
~ ~~
. ~.
~
ws' ~
'r fi
I ~
r ` :~
~ ~~ ;~
SEG'~ETARY ~ANAHEIM Y PLANNING COMMISSION
pro tem
-3-
~
;
.. .{V~~~~~~7~"i~hOYN14~~M1UFXlM'C!N ^ At~JtM.[i44~Yti ~ JSi '.#.Tl~qi% ' ...•,•y
~ ...~'t' ~ . . A~ " ~ ~+~e..m~ear. wu.m~n ~ .. v •-n« ,.•n.a u~ ~~,,r
__ .,., l -~. ., r ~ e,~.. , .
. 3-
~ ' ~
G
h