PC 71-2081._~
RESOLUTION N0. ~' C ~ 1"' ~ ~ 8
A RESOLUTION OF THC CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH~ CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RBCLASSIFICATION N0, % 1~- 7_.,? -! ~ F1E DISAPPROVED
,
~~' WFIEREAS, the Clty Planning Commisslon of the C~ y of An~heim did receive d verified Putltion for Re-
~~' classiflcation from CI,AUpI; A. SI{L' ~WUQll, $OG Soutt~ Rtlhertson, Los An~;eles, Cali ('or.nia 90~35,
~'', Owner; Ll: 1;OY ROSI,, 1440 5oul'h Stple College Boulevard, l',nah~im, (:t~11.Cornia ~28U6, ~:~en1:,
of certain real properry si~uated in rhe City of. Anaheiiu, Count~~ o(' Ur~nge, S~ac;e oL
~ ~'
CaltEornia, dtscri'.~ed a~ beAlnni.nc; et common corner to Sections 3, 4, 9, and L0, Ti~wnshin
4 Sou~h, ,;an~e 9 West, S.D,B, ~ M,; running Lhence llor~h U° 3u' 45'~ Wese: ~lo-~~; :~c~ct:io~:
; li.ne~ 708,5 feeC L•o ~ poiiit in tl,~ cPriter o[ l;xversi~e ;coad ae paved t~v clranf;e Co~:~~~:y I~i~,
+ way Commission; thence Nor.th G6° 16' Last~ along the center of sA.td road <</~~.f~g Eer.C;
; lhence North 23~' 27' West l0"10.20 feee ~o an old ~;ae pipe; tl~ence Nor~h 35~' SU' Last
µ along a line of gum st;umps 332.60 feet to a point; ~henr.e s~orl•h A° 53' 41e:;~ aloiig li,ne
~ o[ old fence 446,30 feet; Lhc>nce ~1orl-h 72° [}7~ Las~ 2g~ 6~ feet to the point oE begin;iing
~" of properl•y hereinafter descr.ibed; r.unnir,~ ti~ence Nortl~ 1&° 33' iJest 119.;~ Ieet; tl:ence
"q
idoreh 80° 26' Gast G45,6 Feet; lhence ?dorlh 11° 28' lJest 426,7 feet; thence Naz•i~.i~! 8O°
•~: ]iast 667.50 [eet; thence Soueh U° 22~ l,,nst 749.25 teet L•o a 2'~ inci~ iron nipe; Cl~,er~c:e
'`~ Sout~h 77° ~3 `[dest 1126. 7[eel; a;~d Li~ence Vorth 18° 2[~ ~~~;eb~ 256. G5 1'eet tu ,• ~-
~'~ oE beginning,
s~~ llie p~ tt,..
''xcepl lhe I:~st 44r Ceet hhereoF said A49 [eet being measured alon~; the 5outherlv lir.e
oP hereinLeCore de5cribed tract and the ',vesterly line of said 1;as~erly 44`:~ Ceec betr,g
paxa11e1 wit.li the Laslerly lii~e of sai.d tract
; end
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim
on ~Q otT . 1, 19 71 ; at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by
law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipol Code, Chapter 18.72, to hear end consider
evidence for and against said proposed reclassifi^ation end to investigate end meke findings and recommendations
in connecti~n therewith; end
- i' WHEREAS, said Commission, aEter due inspection, investigetion, end study made by itself end in its be-
halE, and after due consideration oE all evidence and re~orts oEfered at said hearing, does :ind and determine the
following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes o reclassification of the above described property from the .._~~, ,~ ,; :,;t;, _
' ilP'F~.'., i::%i~~~ f0 CflO ~:-1 i~t.ii~?na.I~ .,. ~'' v
. _....., ;'i!',L <,C!:?1?,
; 2. 'lhat sub;ec.~ properC~~ .~.s witk~:i.n the are~ co•rered ;,; r.f e~, :;'~ cer.i.c . ort~;Jo~
"'••~erlay "one. ~
3. ;~:nr~t the proposed rec lassi. Ei.caLi.on i.s iti con E'orni~rice ori t'ct the ;~eriera L' lai~
lan~i use designations,
4. 1'liat al~hou~h the ~,eiieral I'lan projects a;,eiry~~L-or.hood shopping cenler aL
, ~~~i.s inter.secL-ion, it indica~es ~ha_ ~t:e decisioi•, o~ wf~,eci~er ur r~ol- to zone a parci-
% cul.ar site Eor cor,:merci.al purposes rests upon Llie i:ac~s bearir~a on ~hak
, site. ~ partic~.~lar
5. ':~'hat the residents in Ctie area ha~;e sibned a petitian i.ndicaLir,<; r.hat thc•.~
nol only oppose the zoning, '_•ut L•hat the~,- ~,rould b~ycorC an~~ corunercial facilit:i.c~s .~p~•
pro~red Lor subject properr.y.
G• '.'hat approval ot sub~ect peti.r~on would be coiYtrary to the desires ot r.esi-
denls i~~ the area, and good piann;ng should also rake ;nL-o consider~tion ~he wi.shFs
and desires o[ resident:s of an area.
E
i
A
~~
7. TP,ar residenCs t.n this general area i:ave calce~: ~a kee:~ in.t:eresr. i~; WI13i:~VE'1"
ss de~•eloped in the ':an~~on ar.ea, whi.c'.i is alway~s e~~i.dericed hy ver~• ~ceive participa•~
t..~o~, i,~ any zoning actiar. cor_sidered f.or. thi.s area.
RD
- 1-
~
8. That the proposed rQClasaification of aub~ec~ property ie nat neceas~ry or
desirable tor L•he orderly and proper development of the community,
9, Tliul four pQrsons appeared r~preaenti.ng numer.oue properry owners in the area
and that a pe~ition eigned by 41~ persona wae received all in oppoeition to subject
petition,
~ ',
~ i'~
~' li
~-
.!
I
,~
s
~ w
` ~
~ ;:,
ti
;it`
~,'~
s NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Aneheim City Planning Commission doee hereby recommend
.,, ,,;~
,~ to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that subJect Petition for Rcclassification be denied on the basis of the
;;;; aforementioned Eindings.
~
. sECRETARY ANAHEIh1 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~
;~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
,
ti CITI' OF ANAHEIM )
~1
".1
;~s I, Ann Krebs , Secretery of the City planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
`;~, going resolution wes passed and ~dopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
;~ N ove mbe r 1, 19 71 , at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
;; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, GAUER, KAYWOOD, SEYMOUR.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: HERBST, ROWLAND,
ABSENT: COMMI3SIONERS: rAr,ANO.
iV WITIVESS WNEREOF, I have heceunto set my hand this llth day of November , 1971.
:;r RESOLUTION N0. P C 71- 2 0 8
;~;
"~ R2-D
>,:
:~ti;
c~~
`-:;
,'K
ft,
/vl~YC/ /
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-2-
, ~ ,
_. ~ r
THE FOREGOING RG$OLUTION is signed and approved by me this llth day of November, 1971 .