PC 71-234~
RESOLUTION N0,
FC71-234
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF TEIE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT P~TITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2 3 0 7 BE DENI~D
WHEREAS, the City Planninq Commio~ion of the City of Anehelm did receive a verlfied Petition for Varience from
ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, 1786 West Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, r_aliPorn.ia
92801, Owner o~' certain real praperty s.ttuated in the C~.~y of Anaheim,
Count,y of Orancte, State of Californ.~a, as described in Exhibit ~'A" attached
hereto and refer.red ta herein as th~ugh set Porth in f.ull
WHEREAS, the City Plonning Commieaion did hold a public hesring at the City Hell in the City of Aneheim oa
Novembe r 29 , 19 71 et 2:00 o'clock P,M., notice of said public hearing heving been duly given as required by
1aw end in accordence with the provisions of the Anaheim iv(unfcipal Code, Chapter 18,68, to hear and consider evidence for
and egainat aeid proposed vaeinnce and to inveati~ate end make findings end recommendations in connection therewith;
end
~~
'~ WHEREAS, seid Commission, after dur inspection, investig,ation, end study mede by itself and in its behalf,
-!~ end efter due considerotion of all evidence and reports otfered 'et sald hearing, does find end determu-e the following
'' 'G facts:
:t
;; 1. That the petitioner requesta a variance from the Anahelm Municipal Code as tollows ;
+~
~~t~ a. S~~~:~ION_18.59.041(4) - Permicted uses in the 5C Zune. (Service stations are re-
i`'~ quired to be integrated wit}~ a shopping cer~ter; this
~;r; service statioi; is r.or proposed Co be integrated with a
{ shopping center).
`,~ b, SECTION 18.59.042(1-b)- Setbeck on arterial highwavs.
' "j (~0 feet of setbacic with
>; 20 feet of landscaping required; 18 feet of building set-
~f back raith 14 Peet of landscaping proposed).
'~
; c. SECTION 18.39.040(2) - Free-standin~signs in the SC Zone.
- (None permitted;
'? 2 propo~ed).
;;; d. SECTIUN 18.39,040(b-2)- Time limit oa ~,i~hted s~,,,enr (No sign permitted ro be
;;•~~ lighted between 12 Midnight and 6:30 a.m.; the applicant
f;~'f proposes to light the sign between 12 rtidnighc and 6:30a.m.
I.<;j 2. That the petitioner did not prove hardship to warrant waiver of. the requirements of
I~,~u the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone.
;~
`F' 3. That the p K ~ y }
;5~ pro osed ai nin would be contrar to che desires of the Cit- to retain the
~' scen:c atmosphere of the canyon area.
`'-'~ 4. Tl~ac although t!~e petitioner sCated that negotiaCions Yiad been c~mpleted for purchasp
;~ of the property pr.ior lo lhe .:i.ty Attorney's interpretation of an integrated shupping center,
,
i%~ the intent of the ~';; Zone is to have the service station integrated with a sho in center.
PP~ g
V l-D
~ ,. ~1~
~
i~
~~
;
i~
{
. ...
,~W.._.~.-,.~... i
_..,•. • -- ~ -
~-~ a~....~~.,~ . . .. ~r 7 ~uew ~~L ~
-'.- ~.. ~ ... ~~ q . ~' - . _~Yr: ' . ..
~ ' `
~
}A~~~~.
~~ i
.~!'!k
~1 ~ . .i , ,.... ...
~ ' T1~1C tU Si11Cl CS~iI~C OP 111~CTC8~ P~ ~.I10 (~A~C ~ICCCOP 18 YC$ICCl ltl;
RAXMOND (3. SPEHAR and P;S'!'i?,I,LF K. SPF }
- ~ Trus HAR, Trustees under DeclaraLion oP
ti dated Apr:i1 2, lg6a, by Raymond G. Speh~tr and F.s~el~e K. S ehar
as to an •uncli.vided 75~ interes~ and r9ARCIA ~.NN HALI~IGAN, a marr~ed woman
as to an undiviclecl 25~ in~erest, ~
.~
. ~. t~ ~.^ ~r ~~; •i. 7r~ ~.. . .. .. ._i . .. '. .
. , ~ . -~-A, ~.~. .... ._ . .
The land refcn~cd to in tliis rc~~ort is situntcl in t~~c St1te of Cnlifoxnil, County of Orange
and is dcscriLecl ns follows: .
• • ""'_.-...--------..w.......
That portion of Parcel 2, in the Ci~y of Anahc3m, County of Oran~e, r~
5taLe of Ca7.i~'ornia, as shown on a map fi].ed in book 3b, pa~c ~18 of
~ Parcel Maps, on flle iri the office of the County Recorder of saicl ~ounL-y,
7 ' described as fol].ows : ~
~~~ Beg~.nnin~ at a point in ~h~ Easterly right of way line of Imperial
~'-' H3~h~~~ay, sa3d poinL- bein~ the Southerl.y ~erminus of that cert-ain course
'~ in said ~asterly right of tivay 13.n~ shown on said map as "NorLh 1° 23~ 00"
~~ ~ast. 664.08 feeL"; t}~encc North a8°
~A line of Tmperial H~EhcJay a dis~:ance of' 20~004,feetatonanSandle~~h~ of rtay
~'~ therein; thence South 1° 23~ 00" West alon ~ po~nt
~ sa3d ri~t~t of ~~ray line of
'~t Imperial. Hi~hti~ray a dist~nce of 135.76 fect; ~hence leavina said ri~ht of
''T~ way li ne o#' Imperi~l fii~h~~ray Sou~h 88° ~ ~~ r_
~>: 37 00 Ea~t at xi~ht; an~J.es ~o
~ :~;
alid ri~ht of ~~ray line a disL-~nce of 1Fi0.00 feet; thence Nor~h 1° 23' 00"
;;~ East parallel c~~l.i.h sajd ri~ht of Vray line of Imperial FIi~t~ti~ray a disL•ance
`~ of 136.37 feet to a po3.nt in the Sout•herly right of Vray 11ne of La Palma
~ ~?
;~F Avenue 90.00 feet wlde, as shot~rn on said map, sa3.d Sout-her.ly right of ti~r1y
~ line at sa~d poinL• bein~ the are of a curve concave Sout•herly havin~ 1
I''~ radiu~ of 1 355 00 teet a raciial line throu h ~aid
~~ o r rr ' ; ' ~ " poi~it bears North
? 9 55 05 ~ast, thence ~~lesterly a].on~ said Southerly ri~ht of way 1~.ne
~' of La P~lma Avenue, throu~h a cen~ral an~;le o~' S° 57' 02" an arc distance
'~~ of 1~10.73 feet ~o a poj.ot; in said Easterly ri~;ht of wa~- l~.ne of Imper:La1
~~ FIi~hivay; thence South 1 23 00 ~~~est a1on~ said Eas~erly r~.~ht of ~•ray line
~'~ of Imper~.al Hi~ha~ay a distance of ~u.24 feeL to the Point of Be ~inn:tn
,.. E~• ~.
~~ To~eL-her c~ith the Southerly ha].f of La Palma Avenue ad,join~.n~r sa3.d lanc~
~='~ Qn the Noi°t;h, as said Avenue is descr~,bed in tihe deed to Llie City of
~'~` Anahej.m recorded Ma 1 ]. 0 in boo~c 2
i;:~ ' . y 9' 97 ~ 9 93, pa~e 261, Official Records.
' EXCEI'TING TfIF.HLP~;Of~i thaL portion tihereof eonveyed to the State of
~',~ Czlifurnia by deed recoi~ded OcLober 14 lg 2 in ~~ ~
~ Ofi'icial Itecorcls. ~ 5, booL ~39~, page 522,
`': --r...-_..._....~.._..._..
--__.___ ~~~ •
. .
; o
'~; P.116•C (G s,) ' 1~~7.930,?).~ , •
i CL7/~ Ptclimtnnry riapnrt Fonn pl . ~~cj ~~~, 2~?~. .
~: ~.
i: ~ ,~\\.
~ pC~t 1911 ..._,J ~,
V
~ ' ~ ~L.GL~~~C.D ' ..
~ ' c` ~ r~ G
~, 1p' .~~ ~
~'' a `~y~~ ,;i,~ `~,
~ ~ rU_ •}'',
~..
. . ~~'~t;l/,t`5~=+'~
~ _ . . . ~ . '_ ~1~r1~~~r~14~~v~'. ~'~~J. __~_~.~.--.( -_._.___~
~ .. ~ ' MY ' .~• • ~ ~ ' ' • . ' ' ; ' - ' - • . : . ~ _ • : • - • ~'' ' . '
~ _+;.~ ~ . ,4 ~..
-- --° , , . t~r._.
,~~
~ ~
5. That, i.n order to encaurage and maintain the ecnenities of the scenic corridor, it ia
necessary that flagrant waiver requeate from the Atandards of the SC Zone bs carefully an~lyzed
and either modified or denied,
6. That one peraon appcared in oppoaition,
;.
,;
~F
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anahelm City ~lanning Commission does hereby deny subject
Petition for Variance on the basis of the aforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epproved by me this 9 th d ay o f De ce mb e r, 19 71 .
_ ~/ ~ ~
AT'f EST:
.-J
SECRETARY ANAHEI CITY YLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss, ,
CITY OF ANAHEIM, )
I, Ant?S~;I~t'~bs•~ Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fote-
going resolution was passed and adopted at c+ meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
N o ve mb e r Z 9, 19 71 at 2:00 a'clock P,M,, by the fo:lowing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: AI,LRED, GAUER, HERBST, KAyW00D, ROWLAND, SEYMOUR,
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ,
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS; FARANO.
IN WIT' ESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hend 4his 9 th d ay o f De ce mb e r, 19 71 .
ti
~ ~ ~
*I
` ~ I!
_~( ' %"'~°i'/ /'J/). ~/l.~ s
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY F'LANNING COMMISSION `
RESOLUTION N0. P C 71- 2 3 4
V2-D ~2_
~ , . .