PC 71-284~
a~
~
~i
j,
.~
`
~
h'`` , `%',
,~ ;
~,e ,
*
~
? .'1
RESOLUTION Np, PC71-28
A RL~SOLUTION ~F TNE CITY PLANNINa COMMISSION ON THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
TNAT PETITION ~AR VARIANGE N0. 2232 BE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the Clty Pl~nnln` Comml~slon of the Clty of Annhelm did receive a veritied Petltlon for Varlance from
I.NWRENCE W, ALLEN, 525 South Gilbert, Anaheim, California 92804, Uwrier; MADISON RCAL
CSTATE, INCORPOitATEb, 60Q 5auth Harbor poulevard, Anaheim, California, Agent ot cerCain
roal property situated in the Ciry of• Anaheim, CounL•y of Oxange, State nf California,
described i.n Exhibie "A" al:tached hexeto and referred ta herein ae though set forth in
full.
WHEREAS, the Citp Plannin~ Commis~ion did hold a public headng wt the City tiall in the City of Aneheim on
February 22, 1971, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of aaid public heering heving been duly given ee required by
law and in ecooed~nce vvith the pcovieiona of the Annheim MunicipAl Code, Cheptec 18.68, to hear and coesidec evidence for
end aBeinat aa:d proposed variance and to inveatiQate and meke findings end recommendations in connection therewith;
and
WHEREAS, said Cocamiasion, aftar due inepection, investigation, and study made by itaelf and in ita behelf,
and after due conslderation of all evidence and reporta offered at seid heartng, does Eind and detecmine th~ following
facta:
1. That the petitioner requeats e vaeiance from the Aneheim Municipel Code as follows:
1, SECTION 18.28.050(5) - Maximum~ermitted buildintt heig~ht, (T~ao-story
permitted; three-story proposed).
2. S~CTION~18.28.050(2) - Minimum buildint~ aite area per dwelling unit. (1200
square feet r.equired; 996 square feet proposed).
3. SECTION 18.28.050(7) - Minimum distance between buildings, (19 feet re-
quired; 11 and 12 feet proposed).
2. That the peritioner proposes to develop a 138-unit, two and thr~e-atory apartment
complex on subject property.
3. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable
to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally
to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
4. That the requested variance is neceasary for the preservation and en3oyment of a
substantial property righC possessed by other property in the same viciniCy and zone, and
denied to the property in queation.
5. That the requested variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare
or injurious to the property or improvements in such ti~icinity and zoae in which the property
is located.
6. That two persone appeared ;•epresenting the single f.amily home owners to the north re-
questing that consideration be ~iven to proper landscape buffEring, adequate protection Eor
the existing 6-foot masonry wall with bu~nper guards, special stop signs, and special "speed
bumps", if subject petition was approved.
-1-
~ . , a"'~o'~~ '
~~ . ,
E
_~.
--~.
~~
:~ ~.
,
~
~~; ~
.~-
...,.,. _
rrr~ ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREINAFTER DES('RIBEU OF2 ,
- REFERRED TO .~OVERED • B,Y, ;~~~TS REPORT IS+ ~
,' A F E E • ~ ~ • - ' .!~',~~ F_;' F- .~ /,
~ , , , , ti~r~_ r ~; ,
i . , _,,: ~... ,,,. 'l
, TITI,E TO SAID ESTATE'OR~;IN1~R~ST,AT Thl~ DAT~ H~R~pF IS VkSTED INi
; ~ , , . , ,
; LA~lRENCE W. AL~.~N AND ABJ~,~NE AI.,I,EN~ NlJS6AND ANp WlF;', AS THEIR 212a~~3o,~~,
'',~ COMMUNITY PROPERTY• .
`;`I . ; , 1 4yh~6 O ~ r~~
~ 1 AT THE DATE H ~.~. . M r, ~~~ n
; ,~. CREO~ 1Q m
EXCEPT I ONS TO ~OVERAGE I N ApD I 7ION TO THE N O~~1'~,~,^FO ~
PRIN7ED EXCEpTTOT~$ AND EXCLUSIONS CON7AINEp JN SAID POLICY FORM v, ~ ~,
;;~, '. WOULD $E AS FOLLOWS ~ Si ~
, ~ °6~ M ~,~
~ ~ 8~ ~~ 4~,
W ; ~~ , . , ; - VARIANCE N0. '~ ~ 3 r~~i5-~~
, . .
.~
~ , .
~, . , ~
r~-~- , , ~ ' ~' ~~~-wr-~-~-~-~--~------.--.....~...,..,.~..,~..~~,r..._.~......__.~ .
" ~"~°~`~'~"-~~-~-~----~--~__ ~___.... ~ ~ ,..._,...
;~ THA7 PORT ION OF THE SOUTHWE5T QUART~R OF THE SOU H •--~--a-~,-
~r S~~TION ~2~ T~tdNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 11 WEST~ IN 7HE RA~VCHO
~I~ LOS COYOTE5~ IN THE CITY OF ANAhiCIM~ COUNTY OF ~RANGE, STATE
~. ~,f . OF. C/1L I FOf<N I A~ AS SA I D SEC7 I ON I S SFiOW~V ON A MAP RECORDC~ I N
~, 300K 51 PAG~ 11 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS~ IN THE OFFICE OF THE
'~ COUNTY RECORDCR OF SAIO COUNTYr DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS~
~; ~: i! . ~ ~ . . ' ,
I;~ E~EGINNING AT THE SOUTHbJcST C0IZNER OF 7HE k'EST HALF
' OF SAID
;J~ SOUiH
rJES7 QUARTF.~; THENCE NORTFI 674.00 FEcT ALONG THE CENTER
~; OF THE ROADt THENCE EAST 330.p0 FEET;
' THENCE SOU7H 674.0~ FEET
• ;~
'
y ~ 70 1
HE SoU7H LIn~E oF SAtD SE~TIQN 12:
ALqNG THE ~ENTER LINE
F THENCE WEST. 330.0o FEET
,
,~ O
THL,ROAD, TO THE POINT OF tiEGINNING.
~
, .~ ,
~
~~tj . „
EXCEf't THE SOUTH 40.OO.FEET TNEREOF.
AL50 EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF DESCRIBEp AS FOLLOWSi
~
;
~
~ ~atx
,'~ BEGINNI~'~;G AT A POINT ~~N 7I-~E NORTH LINE OF 1'HE SOUTH 40.00 FEET
`~ OF SAIC SOUTNWEST QUARTER GASTERLY 60sOG FECT THCRCON FROM ''
~ iNE ~~~EST LINE THERE~F; 7HENCE t~~ESTERLY 60.00 FEET ALONG SAtp
''~ RORTH LINE TO SAID ~~lEST LIN~; THtNCE NORTHERLY 20.00 FEET TO
'~~„ A.. LIVE PARaI.LEL ~lITH A(VD NORTHERLY 20.00 FEET FROM SAID NORTH ~
;,
LINEt THENCE EA57ERLY~40.00 FEET ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINEi
;~ ~
~'~~ .TNENCE SOU7FIEASTCRLY TO TFIE PO I NT OF 'E3EG I NN 1 NG.
~
,,~ _. . .. _._...._
. .... . __......~_.._._., ._.....: . ,
,;;~
ALSO EXCEPT THAT F'ORTION THEREOF DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS :~V y~ ~~ ~,
"~ BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE WEST FiALF OF SAID
:~; SOUTHTr1EST QUARTER; THE~ii CE NORTH 175 FEET; THENCE EAST 180 FEET;
;~ THENCE SOUTH 175 FEET; THENUE WEST 180 FEET TO THE POINT
,~:~ OF BEGINNING. (SAID EXCEPTION IS IMPROVED WITH A SERVICE
'~: S TAT I ON . )
~
~ . . , . --: ----------- . -- .
~~~... „~ ~-..__ __--- --._.._.. -- _ ` . , - • ' ~ '.
~
M
I
i
', '. . ,... .. , _ . ...,,. ..._.... _.. _... ; _ .
e'
~ . , ,.
~ ' ~•.. ~ '. ~
NOW, THERCFORE, BE IT RCSOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commisalon doea hereby grAnt subJoct
Petltlon for Veciance, upon the following conditlons whicl~ nre hereby found to be a necossery pcerequisito to the pro-
y poaed uae of the aubject property in order to pceserve the safety and gonerel welfare of the Citlzens of the Gty ot
~ Aneheim.
l,. That thia variance ia granted subject to the completion of Reclaseification No,
70-71-31, now pending,
!; 2. That subject property shall be developed aubataneially in accordance with plane and
speciEicalione on f~.le with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 4, Revision
~ No, 1, and ~xhibit Nos. 2, 3, S, and 6, provided however, that any final landacaping
s plans for the area abutting on the narth shall be sub~ect ro the approval oE the
,; Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance in ordsr to aeaure thaC adequate buEfer landecepH
' acreening ia provided.
~
4~
~ THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is aigned and approved by me this 4th day March, 1971,
~
'~
~
jt
• ~ _,
~' " J
i % /
-~ _i 1 C1~AIR AIV~NAH M CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
'a ATTEST: PRO-TEM
SECRETARY ANA'riEIM CITY YLANNING COMMISSION
~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretery of the ~ity Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify th~st the fore-
going resolution was passed and adopted at a meet~ng oE the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
Eebruary 22, 1971, st 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the Eollowing vote of the members thereof:
• AYES: COt~IMISSIONERS: Al lred, Gauer, Farano, Rowland .
NOES: COM4IISSIONERS: Kaywood, Seymour.
I ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Herbst ,
` jy~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 4th day of Marclt, 1971.
~I
v ~
SEC.°.ETARY ANAHEiM CI'x'Y PLANNING C~MMISSION
~~
~
~
RESOLUTIOII N0. 2g
V2-G
~_...,,~,,,.
-2-
,. ~ . . .
` '°