PC 71-42~'
F~7~~
r'
RI;SOLUTION N0, PC71-42
A RGSOLUTION OI' THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSTON Ol~ Tl1G Ci1Y (
ANAHL'IM RECOIrIl~iGNDING TO THG CITY COUNCIL ~~r T1~lE CiTY
Or ANAHI:IM AMCNDMI.NT'S 'f0 R~SOLUT'1Qi1 N0, PC7],-.].2
R'JUTG -39- HUN7.'INGTON BBACII FRECWAY, '1HCRETO
~'
~'
:;
;:~
1~
- .;~
y ~::
~
WHF,REAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commissi~n on l'ebruary 2, 1971 :n ResoluCion
N0. PC71.-12 did recommend the adoption of a route Eor rlle Route 39 - Huntington Beach
Freeway, with further recommendations as to the dESign criteria; and
WHER~AS, the Planning Commiasion in its resolution intended that the design
criteri.a be a verq strong recommendation, however, in its preparation thia was n~~'
accomplished; and
h~~ WNEREAS, the Pl~nning Commissian is desirous of deletion of the words "br urged
o from paragraphs 1, 2, anci 3, aF their recommendt~tion to the City Couitcil ior
the design criteria.
NOW, THEREFOKE, BG IT RESOLVED, that the Anaheim CiCy P1Anning Commission does
hereby amend its Resolution Plo. PC71-12 as follows;
IiE iT FURTHF.R i2ESULVED ttiat in the consideration of the design criteria for ttie
freeway route careful consideration and adoption of the followi.ng should Ue the
minimums itt the adoption of r_he freeway design:
1. That the State Highway Commission ~cquire si~fficient right-of-way in
order that the freeway could be consr.ructed below-grade or. that land-
scaping and berming may be installed thereby providing sufficient
distance between thc noises and odors from the freeway traffic and
the residenr.ial uses that are adjacent to said freeway.
2. Thar the State HighwAy Commission provide adequate space sufficient
in size fer future rapid transit system.
3. That the State Highway Commission construr.t the freeway below-grade
or a depressed freeway; however, should conditions exist that would
render it impossible to construct a full}~ below-grade facility, eirher
a partially depressed route combined with la:~dscaped earth berming on
both sides or an at-grade Ireeway with fully ?,andscaped eArth berms
in order to minimize the noise and detrimental effects ro rhe adjacenC
residential areas.
4. No, change.
5. No change.
i '~Q
. -t
i i~~
,:k.
` ,~~
e
~ ~ ,'~
~ ~ i
.~f~
t
~
M1
r
THE FOREGOING R~SULUTION is aigned and ~approved by me lhi.~s 18th day of. Mdreh,
1971. /
,' ~ ~ ,•
--•\ • J~ ' .. /.`
~ ' ~- ~
~-- CIiAIRMAN A H CITY PLANNING COM1~lISSION
~'
t
a
~~
~
' } _~
ATTEST:
~~., ~( ' ~' , .
i i, ~;l--1 _~.Z ~.' / Z.~_ G+.._,......•
~ SECRh~TARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
;?;
~'1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
`''~ COUNTY OF ORANGE ) sa,
~; ~
,~+;.~ CITY OF ANAHEIM )
,,~,
,` t
~r~: I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the C~Ity Planning Commisaion of the City of Anaheim, do
;~~ hereby certify that the foregoing reaolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the
; City Planning Commission of the Cit•y of Anaheim held on March 8, 1971, at 2;00 o'clock
:,~ P.M., by the following vote ~f the memhers thereof;
`~ AYES; COMMISSIONERS; Allred, rarano, Gauer, Herbst, KAywood, Seymour.
!'~
1 NOES; COMM::~::_ONERS: None.
~;,
ABSENT; COMMISSIONEFS; Fowland,
i'
: IN WITNE5S WHEREOr, I hnve hereunto set my hand this 18th day of Marc?., 1971.
~~
'7 ,
r,~, ~' '
L,-~.1-c-~-~.~ 2~,~~t.1.~..
, SECK~TARY ANAHEIM CITY PI,ANNING COMMISSION
Res. No. 42
~ ~
r