PC 72-136- - -- _ _ . ._ . ~ _ _ . _. -----------
--
PC72-136
RESOLUTION N0.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE C?TY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDTTI~NAL USE PERMIT NO. 1314 gE GRANTED
14HEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petitio~ for Conditional
Use Permitfrom CANAL-RANDOLPH AIZ4HEIM, INCOFPORATED, Attention of Gary A. Clarke, Vice Presi-
dent, Suite 5Q5, Bank of America Building, 300 Sauth Harbor Boulevard, Anaheim, California
92805, Ow:1er; VONOLA CUTTER, Leasing Representative, Suite 505, Bank of America Building,
300 South Harbor Boulevard, Anaheim, California 52805t Agent of certain real property situ-
ated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,described as PARCEL 1:
Lors 1 through 7 inclusive, of Regier Subdivision as per map recorded in Book 6, Page 37 of
Miscellaneous Meps, in the office of the CounL•y Recorder of said county. PAfi~~EL 2: Lots
/., 5, 7, 9, 12, 13 and 14 of Block C of Davis Brorhers addition to Ar.aheim as per map record-
ed in Book 2 Pages 632 and 633 of Miscellaneous Recorde, in the office o£ the County Record-
er of Los Angelea County, California, EXCEPT the westerly 10.00 feel• of said lots 12, 13 and
14 ae described in the Deed L•o the City of AnaF~eim, recorded February 1, 1909 in Buok 163
Page 104 of Deeds, Records of said county
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Cammission did hold e public hearing et the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
June 26, 1972, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public heering having been duly given as required by
law and in accordence with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipel code, Chepter 18.64, to hear end consider evidence
for and egair.st said pcoposed conditional use and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection
therewith; nnd
WHEREAS, said Commission, aEter due inspection, investigetion, and study mede by itself end in its behalf, and
efter due consideration of all evidence and reports offered et seid hearing, does find end detertnFne the Eollowir.gfacts:
1. Thet the proposed use is properly one for whlch a Conditionel Use Permit is authorized by Code Section
18.64.020(1-f) to wit: eatablieh a private educationai inatitution in an exieting office
buildin~ with waiver cf:
SECTION 18.38.050(4-a-6) - Minimum r.umber of reQUired parkinq stalls
(442 required; 398 provided)
as approved,
2. Thet the proposed use/will not adverse!y afEect.the odjoining lend uses end the growth end development uE
the erea in which it is proposed to be located.
3. That the size end shape oE the site proposed for the use is adequate to ollow the full development ofthe
px,posed use in e manner not detrimenta! to the perticuler erea nor to the peace, liealth, safety, nnd generel welfare of
the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
4. That the granting of the Conditionel Use Permit under the canditions imposed, if ony, will not be detrimental
to the peace, heulth, safety, end general wetfere of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
5. That the petitioner stipulated that there would Ue only nighCtime studenta for the
firat two years.
6. That the petitioner stipulated to attempting to resolve the on-streeC parking by
employees in the lerge office complex.
7, The one person repreeenting herself and another resident in close proximity appeared
in oppoeition to L•he requeated waiver of the number of parking stells required,
Cl•G -1-
~
~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED thet the Anaheim City Plenning Commission does hareby grent subject
petition far Conditionel Use Pecmit, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be e necessery prerequisite
to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the sefety end general welfare ofthe Citizens of the
City oF Aneheim:
(1) Taat subjecl• property stiall be developed subatantially in conformance with plans
ar.d specificstio^.s o: file aith tke City of Azaheim marked ExhiUit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, S and
6.
(2) That tke use sha11 be limited to -:igh.ttime classea only and thaL at such time as
daytime students are proposed, the uae to~~ther with the oLf and on-atreet parking shall be
reviehed at a readvertised public hearir.o to discuse any potential detrimental effects.
(3) That all parking shall be in accordance with the parking agreemer.t betvteen the
proposed schocl ard the lessor/owner of the structsre oa file.
THE F012EGOING 12ESOLUTION is signed end approved by me tnis 6th day of JLly, 1972,
C
CHAIRMAN ANAHF,IM C TY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~~'~/ %~~~Lw`r/
SECRE:TARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY aF OKANGE ) ss.
CITY OF AIJAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of fhe City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hereby certify thet
the foregoing resolution wes pessed and adopted at e meeting of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
held ua Jur.e 26, 1972, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the membera theceof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: A'LiRED, F.;RkNO, G9UE;R, HERBST, ICAYWOOU, SEYMOUR.
NOES: COMh7ISS10NERS: NOi1E.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
nIIST4iN: COMM]:SSIONcRS: RUWL3Nli,
IN WITNESS Wf{El2EOF, I have hereunto set my hend this 6th day of July, 1972.
RESOLUTION NO. PC72-136
Ci~~~n~t/ %,~~ _
SECRETARY ANAHEIM C1TY PLANNING COMMISSION
c2-r, . 2.