PC 72-142~ _ _ _ ._. . .._
RESOLUTION N0,
~c , 2•• ~wz
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARLINCE NO. 238'L BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the Cit Plennin Commieaion of the Ctty of Anaheim did receive a vecified Petition for Varience fcom
~,I4, nN~t+.Ci~N, L\COR~tiR;TL•i~, gi'i ~61 New Hampsnire ntie-..:e, Sii.var ~prir~g, ,1&ryia:_d 20904, Owner;
Ff~:~'fll .yni GO'~r-.NY, 1NGGR~vk'.1'ii.. 3~Y5 La~. S:reEt, Lo~. ~e,geie~, Cai~ior::ia 90031, 6gent of
;:er;.air. re~1 prop:rry si_'_n=ed i~. ::ha Ci•:> oi ~-.a:~eim, Cc.:nt'r of Ora:rg2, Sta~e of Ce'l.iforttia,
d~scri:~ed ~s '~ia c~:r.eTi: ~Ob,OJ feec ~:E ~~.e Narr.h }:Eif. uf i~^e ~u'.:C~eas:: q..3tt.er of the North-
west q.~~ri~.r oL' ~act;o,. :.i, 'C,=w:.t'l~ip 4 Su~_i., Raz:ge i0 West; Sa•~ Berr:er3ic•:o Ba~e aud Meridian,
ir. t::e Re .::tio Sa:. J:.a:: ~:ajo•r~ ae J5 _f! .°+T:~s es pez Map cecorde,: i•:: Book 5Z, Yage ~, et seq.
?ti.=_.:ei:_»er.. M:~p~, i•:: t'±.e uiri~e of !'~.e ::a.,•'..'; Recoc@er oi' ~yid Cu~°:L,. E:.~:CE~~t I'HERBFROM the
Su,.i~~ Y~2.~0 ~ee= ''~ez~rat. ~.~a.~ :.•(:I-I' '~cse pori.io:3 i~i:_3 wili~i:_ Gac;~z;::ia;: Wa~ a:-d HarUor
ISJLi1CVS37'Q sv cor.v~.~.i ;~ :..,~~~ C.i~.~ ot ..~c.a~,=.:m, e,; d~~d recorLed ~OV~qipE[ 22, 1967, ir: Book 8444,
P&ge e.5o, Oii~icial Rr~.ord:; =~ ~.:
WHEREhS, the Clty Planning Commisaion did hold a oublic hearing at the City Heil in the City of Aneheim on
J,i, e 2G, i9 ~ 2, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid publlc hearing huving been duly g)ven es cequired by
law end in eccocdance with the provisions of the Aneheim Municlpel Code, Chepter 18.68, to hear and consider evldence for
and egelnst said pcoposed verience and to investigate end meke findings end recommendetions in connection thecewith;
end
WHEREAS, eaid Commission, efter due inspection, investigetlon, and study mede by itself end in Its behelf,
end efter due coneideretion of ell evidence and reports offered at seid hearing, does find and detecmine the following
fects:
1. Thet thc petltioner requeats e veriance Ecom the Anaheim Munlclpel Codc 6~ foiiew:::
- . . . ,. si.~. (300 f:eet req,i.tred• SO
3F:CC~DN ~ri 6~.U9alr.:L1 _ vi".nr_m ci.t.~i~c~e bel:wes.^ ... _. '
_......_._ _ .... . t~t~' p:upceedj ~
Z. ii~:~~ ci.e pECi:l~,.:ee l~i.< r.:..` pr.uce:i a':,aeder.ip eaisce~. ~L:.ce ~:.ere waa ampie arEa on
ct:e properr: to pr~vide :~httir:g :r,. i,c:cccsr.ce witl•~ tne eign ccfiii:a•,•~ce w'.±f•.; sigr,it,g for tlie
propFrty wa~ firec cunsiaered.
3. TI~aC :t sunjec~. peLi~ i~~;~ wece +.,ppr~~cFd su3 cY.e se..:c. prupo~in3 sn;arCi.taLion oL all
nor-confonn.Cr•.h .ig,.s ir: ~Le Comm~r:i31-Recr~SCi.~-. ~rre3 were adcpted, _i~~ proposed sigr would
become & ncn-cu:~formirg sih~, s,,:~.~! Mc.,:r,' bE a'•.•:=je~t e.o amurtizt+t:~n, ir: which c~se khe petiticr,er
ca.~id claim a t~nru_hip ez.i~.;,.ed i•.. :l~ec a vbris:-re i•:aZ heee: bpproved s:.3 cc-:siderable monay had
beer. eaper.¢ed ior ~aic2 sig~..
:. Ct:ae ..o•.tiderati~~~, a'.~,a•..i3 1.av~, i~ee•:: ~iver. io ail eignir,g fur tne px~pErt;~ &t the time
pl~~:e f.uc u~e e..i~cit~g s1g:: wer~; bel•~:~ co:asidered,
5. P'r5e i^::ere ere r.:~ except.ic::~x~ or ~.:sCc_ordinsr; circ.:me,s••.:ee ur eondilion~ appiicable
to [he prcper:. i.,:vo'cved ~•r tc~ c*.~C i.'_e~-ded .:aE of Uie prcper:;. 'r.e_ c~ r.t .ppiy generall;r L•o
[t~e pr.opercy vr C1989 .~C '..se .ir r:•.e :sme vi_i:.i...y ar.e zo:.e.
6, i':~a[ rr.e req..es::ed v3ri5r.cE is n.. ~.ece~c5r< t.r; tne pre~Erva=icr. ar:3 e~ijo.~rment of a
subs~ar.ri•si pr~per.~~ r:gcc poese_5ed tr; o,-t.er proper;y l.r, tne s5me vicir:ily trd zone and deried
co ~he prupercy ii: q::.escir,n.
7, TF,~c UZC. req~Ea'-ea vsriy~s~:e wi.,.': be m~teria.l± de.rimC::t:l to ci~e pubiic welfare ur
inj~.riou; co tt:e prop~c. ~• o~i improvcmt~:'_; ii~ c~._cr, VLCL1l7.Lj a;:d zu:,e i•.•. w',ic.i: Lhe prapecC~ is
1oc&eed.
Vi-D -1-
~
~
~
NOW, THEREFORE, BG 1T RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Plenning Commlesion does hereby deny subject
Petition for Varience on the besis of the aforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epproved by me thls 6th day of July, 1972.
~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEI i CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~";y.."" `
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) as.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, And, $seb~yge, Secretery of the City Planning Commiselon of the City of Aneheim, do heceby ce~lfy that the fore-
going resolutlon was peased end edopted et e meeting of the City Plenning Commission of the City oE Anahei:n, held on
June 26, 1972, et 2:00 o'clock p,M., by the following vote oE the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONF,RS: FARANO, HEkBST, KAYWOOD, RO'WLAND.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, GA.UER, SEYMOUR.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE. .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I havr,. hereur.to set my hend this 6th day of July, 1972.
RESOLUTION N0. PC72-142
Li~ ~ y~ ~ vr"'Qi
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
V2-D '2'