Loading...
PC 72-152~ ~ REiOLUTION N0. PC 72-152 A R1iSOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEII1 THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 2390 BE GRANTED WHEREAS, the City Planni.:¢ Commission of the City of Anaheim did ceceive e verified Petition Eor Variance Erom MR, and MRS. RI~HARD h:.MPHEFNER, 929 South Caplan Street, A~aheim, Californie, 92802 Owners of certain real property situated in the City of Anahei~,; County of Orange, State of California, d~scribed as Tract No. 1020 and Lot No. 3~, ~ S~, pages 29, 31 ; and WHEREAS, the City Planning Cammission did hold e public hearing at the City Hell in the City of Aneheim on ~ul y 1Q, 1972 at 2:`JO o'clock P.M., notice of seid public heering hev~ng been duly given es required by law and in eccocdance with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipel Code, Chapter 18.68,to hear end consider evideuce for end egeinst seid proposed varience end to investigete end make findings and recommendations in connec- tion therewith; and WtiEREAS, seid Cammissinn, eftet due inspection, ine•estigetion, end study made by itself end in its behelf, end after due consideretion of all evidence end reports offered et seid hearing, does find und determirte the following facts: 1. Thotthepetitianerreauests variances from the Anaheim Municipal Code as follows: a, S_~TIOh 1G_0~>.OyU(2-c - Maximum eave proiection into the front setback. (2 feet. u inches permitted; 4 feet, b inches propo!>ed) b. SECTIOFi 18.04.J~0(2-q) - Maximum wall heiqht in the front setback. feet, o inches permitted; ~ feet~ ~ inches proposed) c. SECTI01; 1G.24.030(1-a) - hfinimum front setbaci:. ('_; feet required; 1 feet 4 inches proposed) 2. That the petitioner proposes to construct a room addi':',on projecting intu the required front setback. 3. That the proposed projection into the reyuired front yard is granted on the basis that the existing and proposed floor area will cover only 2~% oP this large corner lot. 4. That the proposed wall and room additiun were located on the lot in such a manner so as to not interfere witn adequate site line distance for autornobiles approachinq this Incal street intersection. S. Thet there ere exceptionei or extraordinery circumstances or conditions appliceble to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply genereliy to the property ot cless of use in the same vicinity end xone. o. . That the requested varience is necessary for the preservation and enjoy~nent of e substantiel prooerty right possessed by other property in the seme vicinity end zone, end denied to the property in question. ~•. That the requested veriance will not be materially detrimentel to the public welEare or injurious to the pmp- erty or improvements in such vicinity end zone ir which the property is loceted. V1-G -1' i r NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RE:~ED that the Aneheim Clty Plenning Co~sion does hereby grnnt subject Petition for Varience, upon the following conditions which ece hereby found to be a necessery precequisite to the pro- posed use of the subject property in ~~cde: to preserve the sefety end generel welfere o[ the Citizens of the City of Anaheim: (1) That subject propert.y shall be developed aubatantially in accordance with plans and specifications on £ile wi~th the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2. (2) That Condition No. 'l, above mentioned, ehall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspeatioiss. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is sl~ed and ~pprovsd by me thio ~ 20th d~of July, 1972. ANAHEIM CITY ATTSST: ~~,...,~i%~~~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANDiING COMMISSYON STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGG ) as• CTfY OF ANANEIM ) I, Ann Krebs, Secretery of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution wes pessed and edopted et a meetlng of the City Plenning Commission ofthe City of Anaheim, held on July 10, 1972, et 2:00 o'clxk P.M., by the following vote oE the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, FARANO, GAUER, HERBST, KAYWOOD, RChILAND, SEYMOUR, NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE. IN WITNESS WHEI2EOF, I have hereunto eat my hend this 20th dey of July, 1972. /~~%/~/i~ ~~~ _"~" ` _, SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTI9N NO. P~~2'152 V2-G "Z'