PC 72-18~ ~
RESOLUTION D70. PC72-18 _
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMIS;~ION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. ~ 319 BE GRANTED
l1'HEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim did re=eive a veriEied Petitiun for Verience
from CHURCH OF CFIRIST, 1590 West Ball Road, An.aheim, Cali£ornia 92802, Owner;
JAMES D. COX, 17531 Leafwaod Lane, Tustin, California 92680, Agent of certain
real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
California, described ns the Flent 164.00 feet of the North 459 feet of the
Northeast quarter of the Northweat quarter of Section 21, in Township 4 South,
Range 10 West, in the Rancho San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana, as shown on a map
thareof, recorded in Boak 51, page 7 etseq., Miscellaneous Maps, records of
said Orange County
; end
NHEE2EAS, the City Plenning Commis~ion did hold a public hesring et the City He11 in the City o! Anehelm
on Febr~ary 7, 1972 , at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seld publi: hearing heving been duly given es required
by lew end !n eccordance wltfi the provislons oE the Aneheim Municipel Code, Chepter 18.68, to hear and consider
evldence for end egulnst seid Qroposed varIence end to Investigete end meke flndings and recomnende:ions in connec-
tion therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commlaslnn, efter due inspection, investipation, and etudy mede by ltself end in its behelf,
end efter d~e considere!ion of ell cvldence and repode oEfnred et said heering, does find and detertnine the following
fects:
1. Thet thc petitioner reauests e varlence f:om the Anaheim Muniefpel Code:
SECTION 18.52.045(c) - Msxinum SiAn Ar~a (20 sauare feet_ permitted; 48 eausre
£e _et proposed)
2. 'fhet there ere except[onel or extreordinery circumstences or conditions eppliceble to the property involved
or to the lntended use of the propecty thet do not epply generally to the property or class of uae in the aeme vielnity
and zone.
3. Thet the requested verlenee is necessary for the preservetion end enjoyment ot e substantlel property right
possessed by other property in the same vicinity end zone, end denied to :he property in question.
4. Thet the requeated veriance will not be meterielly detrimentel to the public welfare or injurious to the pmp-
erty or improvements in such vicinity and zone in whieh the propeRy is loeated.
5. That no one appeared in opposition to this application.
V1-G -1-
~ ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Anaheirt: City Planning CommissIon does hereby grant subfect
Petilion fer Varieace, upon the following cronditions which ere herrby tound to be e necessary prerequislte to the pco-
posed use of the subject property in order to preserve the seEety end generel welfere oE the Citizens oE the City of
Anal:eim:
(1) That adequate clearance of existing electrical lines ahail be provided as required
by the Electrical Division, Department of Public Utilitiea, and the State of California G.O.
95.
(2) That aubject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans
and apeciffcations on file with the City of Anahe.+m marked Exhibit No. 1.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION ls sip~ed ~ad ~pproved by me 17th day February, 1972 .
~~,
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
_~~ Q'2/ i ~
SECRE: RY~ANAHEUd CIT~]' ANNING COMMISSION
pro tem
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUN1'Y OF ORANGE ) s~.
C1TY OF ANAHEIM ) ,
pro tem
I, Lee IIurgess, $~Fretery/of the Clty Plenning Commiseion of the City ot Anaheim, do hcreby certlfy thet
the foregoing reaolutlon wes paesed end edopted at a meetlng ot the Clty Plenning Commiseton of the City of Anehdm,
held on February 7, 1972 , at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote oE the members lhereof:
AYES: COMMIS9IONERS: FARANO, GAUER, HERSST, ROWLAND, SEYMOUR.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: KpyW00D.
ABSENT: COMMISSIOt:ERS: ALLc~ED.
IN WI1'NESS SVHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hwd this 17th ciay o f February , 1972.
~
.Q,.?~
SECRETARY~ANAHEGt CI'fY PI. ING COMMISSION
pro tem
RESOLUTION NO. PC72-18
V2-G -2-