PC 72-192~ ~
RESOLUTION NO. pC72-192
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PI.ANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 2431 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a vc:iEied Petition for Variance
from RONALD R. COSBY, E1 AL, 2230 North Weatwood Street, Santa Ana, California 92706, Owners
of certein real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
described as The South half of the northeast quarter of the North half of Lot 14, Block "K" of
the Kramer Tract as pe= map recorde8 in.book 12 pages 87 and 88 of Miscellaneous Records, in
the office of the County Recorder of Los Angeles County, California
; end
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in fhe City of Anaheim
on Auguat 21, 1972 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing having been duly give~ as cequired
hy lew and in eccordence with the pcovisians oE the Aneheim Municipel Code, Chepter 18.68,to hearend consider
evidence Eor end against seid propaac~l wirience end to investigete end meke Eindings and recommendations in connec-
tion thetewith; end
WHEREAS, seid Commissinrt, After due inspection, investigation, and study mede by itaelf end in its behelf,
and efter due consideration of bll evidence end reports oEfered et said heering, does find and determine the following
fects:
1. Thet the petitioner revuests variances from the Anaheim Municipal Code as follows:
a. SECTION 18.52.040 - Permitted outdoor uses. (Trailer repair and testing
proposed; trailer repair and teating not permitted)
b. SECTIQN 18.52.060(3-b) - Outdoor storage screening requirement._ (Six-foot
solid masonry wall required; six-foot slatted chain-
link fence proposed)
2. That there ere exceptionel or extreordinery circumster.ces ~r conditions eppliceble to the propecty involved
or to the intended ~se of the property that do not apply generelly to the property or class of use in the same vicinity
and zone.
3. That the cequested variance is necessery for the preservation and enjoyment of a substential property right
possessed by other property in the seme vicinity and zone, and deiied to the property in question.
4. Thet the requested variance will not be materielly detrimentAl to the public welfare or injucious to the pmp-
erty er improvements in such vicinity and zone in which tha property is loceted.
5. That due to the fact that the petitioner proposes to store completed mobilehomes to
the rear of the existing structute; the fact that the prope~ty has sufficient depth; and the
fact that said atorage area will ~~~entually be surrounded aiLh at:~~z industrial uses, the re•~
quirement of the six-foot high rto~ic~ masonry wall is hereby waived and a iedwood alatted
chainlinl: fence is permitted in liea t:hereof.
6. That the petitioner atipulated that the proposed repair and testing of mobilehomes
would be only incidental and would be conducted immediately to the rear of the existing struc-
ture.
7, Thnt the petitioner stipulated there would be no storage of mobilehomes in the drive-
~ways on either side of the building.
-1-
. r ~ ~ ~
NOW, THEREFOT<E, BE IT RESOLVED thet the pneheim City Plenning Commission does hereby gcent subject
Petition Eor Variance, upon the following conditions which are hereby, found to be e necessary prerequisite to ;he pro-
posed use of the subject property in order to pceserve the safety and generel welfere of the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim:
(lj That the remaining water and sewer acreage feea for subject parcel shall be paid
to the City of Araheim.
(2) That trash storage areas shell be provided in accordance with approved plans on
file with the office of the Director of Public Works.
(3) That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary
by the Chief af the Fire Department.
(4) That this Variance is granted subject to the c~mpletion of Reclassification No.
61-62-69(49).
(5) That subject property shall be developed subsCantially in accordance with plans
and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 and 3.
(6) That Conditiol Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior
to the commencement of the activity authorized under this resolution or prior to the time that
the tuilding permit is issued or within a period of one year from date hereof, whichever occurs
first or such furL•her time as the Planning Commission may grant.
(7) That the proposed repair and testing shall be only incidental work and shall be con-
ducted immediately adjacent to the rear of the existing building as stipulated to by the peti-
tioner.
(8) That no storage of parts or vehicles shall be conducted along the fence to the side
of the eriating structure as etipulated to by the petitioner.
THE FOI7EGOLYG RESOLUTION is signed and epproved by me this 31at of
ATTEST:
~!~C' " _ _
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) 88•
t, 1972.
CITY OF l+NAHEIM ) ,
I, Ann Krebs, Secretery of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do heceby cecti.fy that
the focegoing resolution was passed end edopted et a meeting oE the City Plc+nning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
held on August 21, 1972, ot 2:00 o'clock P.iv~., by the following vote of the members thereuf:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: GAUER, HERBST, KAYWOOD, SEYMOUI~.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO.
ABSENT: COMMISSION~RS: ALLRED, ROWLAND.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend this 31st day of Auguet•, 1972 .
`!~i~'f/!'f/ ,
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CIT"i' PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. PC72-192
V2-G -2'