PC 72-209RESOLUtI~10. PC72-209 ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEiM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2423 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim did receive a verified Peti~tion for Variance
from STAt.'DARD OIL OF CALIFORNIA, Post Office Box 31, Long Beach, CaliforniA 90801, Owner;
reallpropertylsituetedEinPthe City of$Anaheim,LCounty~of OrangernSt~te7of~C'eliforniaCedeein
cribed aa The West 200.00 feec of the South 125.00 feet of the North 191.00 feet of the
northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of section 14, Townehip 4 South, Range 11 West,
in the Rancho I~oe Coyotea, as per map recorded in book 51 page 11 of Miecel'.laneous Maps
in the office of the county recorder of said county. EXCEPT that portion o:E the Nurth
20.00 feet of said South 125.00 feet, lying westerly of the following deecri:befl line: Be-
ginning at a point on the North line of said South 125.00 feet, easterly 50.00 feet from
the West line of eaid northwest quarter; thence southwesterly on a direct li.ne to a point
on the south line of said North 20.00 feet, easterly 30.00 feet from eaid WE:et line
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commisslon did hold e public henring et the City He?1 in the City oE Aneheim
on August 21~ 1972, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public hearing heving been duly givm
es required by lew end in accordence with the provisions oE the Meheim Municipel code, Chepter 18.68,ta hear
end consider evidence for end egelnet seid propos~ed conditionel use end to investigote end ~eke findings end
recommendations in connection therewith; end
WHEREAS, sald Comm(ssion, efter due inspection, investigation, and study mede by itself end in its br
half, and efter due consideretion ot ell evldeace and repocts offered et seid hearing, dons flnd end determine the
following fects:
1. That-;thg,,.petitioner requests variari~.'~a frb~P~"7-nahei~m':'Municipal
Code as follows:
a, SECTION 18.62.090(H-1) - Minimum distanca between free-standtng
sians, (300 feet requiredJ 48 feet
propoaed)
b. SECTION 18.62.090(B-1) - Maximum number of free-atanding eiyns.
(3 proposedT 1 permittod)
c. SECTION 18.62.090(S-5~ ' ~SZifeetdrequiredJ~50 feeteproposed)
d. SECTION 18.62.090(B-2) - Minimum sign height. ro oaed)
(B feet requ~red; 6~i feet p p
2. That signing as propoaed is far in excoss of signinq permitted within
the Sign Ordinance. recedentrwhereinieveryeother~servicebstationlinh
ing an undeair~ble p
Anaheim could request similar signinq.
3. That the Planning Commiasion earlier in 1972 had denied recedentY
request with a finding that approval would establish a p
for mass signing of other service stations thruughout the city, and
no changea have occuzzed to warrant favorable consideration of this
petition.
-1-
" o • ~
4. That the petitioner is proposing to increase the number of signs on
these service station sites from four to eiyht times th3t permitted
by Code, thereby automatically granting the petitioner a privileqe
not enjoyed by otiier commercial and industrial developments throuqh-
out the city.
5. That there are no Excepticnal or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended
use of the property that do not apply generallf to the property or
class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
6. That the requested variance is not necessary for the preservation
and eajoyment of a substantial property right po$sessed 'ny other
property in the same vicinity and zone and denied t~~ the property
in question.
7. That the requested variance will be materially detrimental to the
public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such
vicinity and zone i.n which the property is located.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Aneheim City Plannin~ Commisdon does haeby deny subJect
Petitlon for Varlence on the besle ot the eforementioned Elndinge.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION ie aigned end epproved by me thl^ 31e~ dny of Auguet, 1972.
ANAHEIM CITY
ATTEST:
`i~~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ee.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Kreba, • Secretary of the Clty Planning Commieslon of the CSty oE Anahslm, do hereby ceRlty th~t the Iore-
going resolution wes peesed end edopted et e meeting ot the City PlanninQ Commis~ion ofthe City ot An~h~im, held on
Auyuat 21, 1972 , et 2;00 o'clock p,M„ by the following vote ot the members thereot:
AYES: COMMISSIOPIERS: FARANO~ GAUER, HERBST~ KAY4i00D~ SEYMOUR.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, ROWLAND.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend thle 31st day of Auguat, 1972.
~:~~~ %~~w~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RGSQLUTION N0, pC72-209
V2-D '~