PC 72-246RESOLUTI~ON NO. pC72-246 ~
:. RESOLUTION OF THE C:TY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CI1'Y OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VAR[ANCE NO. 2439 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Variance from
FRANK DOYLF ar.d L4UR4NCE SHI~LDS, 831 South Manchester, Anaheim, Celi~or.nia 92802, Oc.mers;
P}II:.LI?S PETROLEUM COMP4N~, Att~r_~ior of Brer:t Hstch, 66 Bovet Road, San Mateo, Califernia
944U2, Agant of certaia real property sitnated ir, th2 City of Anaheim, County of Orange,
State of California, 3escribed s~ The South 200.00 feet of the West 200.00 feet (m~asured
from tha czn'tQr lines of streets adjoiaing on the South and Wes*_) of Lot 23 of Aneheim
Investm~nt Campsny's Tract as per mep recorded in boek 7 pages 33 and 34 of Miscellaneous
Maps, in the office of the covnty recorder of said county, now know?i as the South 150
feet of the West 150 f.eeY. of. Lot 16 of Tr2ct No. 2534, as per mep recorded in book 115
PAj~P.B LS and 15 of Miscellaneovs *t~ps, in the office of Che covn*_y recorder of said county
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
SepCember 18, 197~, at 2:00 o'clock p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly ~ven as required by law and
in accordance with the provisions af the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.68,to hear and considerevidence forand xgainstsaid
proposed variance and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after duc inspecfion, investigation, and study made b;~ itselC and in its behalf, and •rPter due
conside~ation oi all e~ridence and reports offered at said hearing, does fnd and determine the following facts:
1. That the petitioner requests variances from the Anatieim Municipal Code as follows :
a, SECTION 18.37.040(B-1) - Maximum number of free-atanding siQns.
(1, permitted; 3 proposed)
b. SECTIUN 18.37.040(B-1) - Minimum distance between free-sta:dinQ si~na.
(300 feet required; 13 feet proposed)
c. SECTION 18.37.040(B-2) - rfinimum heit~ht of free-standinQ siQrs. (8 feet
re.quired; 6.5 feet proposed)
2. That granting subject petition would be eatablishing an iindesirable precedent
wherein every otner service station in Anaheim could request similar signing.
3. Thae the Planning Commission earlier in 1972 had denied a similar request with
a finding that approval would eatabliah a precedent for mass signi.zg of other service
stations throughout the City and no changes have occurred to warrant favorable considera-
tion of L-his petition.
4. That there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions appli-
cable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply
generally to the property or class of. use in the'same vicinity pnd zone.
5. That the requested variance is not necessary ~or the preservation and enjoyment
of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same eicinity and zone,
and denied ro the property in quesrion.
6. That the requested variance will Ue meterially detrimental to the public welfare
or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the prop-
erty ... '_c.~.:sted.
VI-U - 1 -
DEV-66-E
~
~
~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Anahelm City Plenning Commission does hPreby deny suaject
Petition for Variance on the besis of the afore~centioned flndings.
Tf:E FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end approved by me this 28th day of September, 1972.
ANAHCIM
A7'TEST:
~r~'ru.~9/
SECRETARY HNAHE CITY PLANN~iG COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. '
CITY OF ANANEIM )
~~ M~~.
I, Ah~''t;k'BB;~'Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do heceby cedify thet the fore-
going recolution wes pessed and edopted et e meeting of the City Plenning Commiesion ofthe City of Aneheim, held on
September 18, 1972, at 2:00 o'clock P,M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMIIIISSIONERS: AI.LRED, GAU~R, HERBST, KAYWOOD, ROWLAND, SEYMOUR.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
AESENT: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand ffiis 28th day of September, 1972.
~i~%~/~i~~~liGG'~!/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. YC72-246
V2-D -2-