Loading...
PC 72-26~ ~ RESOLUTION N0. PC72-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF' THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT PET1TfON FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. ~l"72"ZS BE APPROVED WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did recelve a verified Petition for Reclassifica- tionfrom MICHAEL ROBERT KRAL, 1102 Bungalow Place, Arcadia, California 91006, Owner; FRED W. VEIGA, 15351 Touraine Way, Santa Ana, California 92705, Agent of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, ,~,tate of California, described as Parcel No. 1: Lot 13 of Tract No. 743, as per Map recorded in Book 22, Page 10 of Miscel- laneous Mapa, in the office of L-he Recorder of said County. EXCEPT the West 52.65 feet of that portion lying Southerly of the Southerly line of the North 225.00 feet thereof, ALSO EXCEPT the North 96.00 feet thereof. Said land is included within the area shown on a Map filed in Book 7i, Page 7 of Record of Surveys in the office of said County Recorder. Parcel No. 2: The West 52.65 feet of Lot 13 of Tract No. 743, as per Mep recorded in Book 22, Page 10 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the Rc:corder of said County. EXCEPT the North 225.00 feet thereof ; end WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hell in the City oE Aneheim on February 7, 1972, at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of said public hearing having becn duly given as required by lew and in accorder,ce with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.72, to hear and consider evidence for end egainst seid pioposed reclassificetion and to investigete end make findings and recommendetions in connection therewieh; and WHEREAS, said Commission, eEter due inspection, investigetion, end study made by itself and in its behelf, end after due consideretier. of all evldence end ceports offered et said heering, does Eind end determine the following fects: 1. That the petitioner proposes a reclussificetion of the above des~ribed property fcom the R-A, AGRICULTURAL, ZONE to tha R-3, MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIP.L, ZONE. 2. that the proposed reclassification would implement the General Plan designation for medium density residential lend use projected for this area. 3. That the proposad reclessificetion of subject property is necessary and/or desirable tor the orderly end pro- per development of the community. 4. Thet the proposed reclassification of subject property does properly relete to the zones and their permitted uses locelly esteblished in close proximity to subject property end to the zones end their permitted ases generally estab- lisfied throughout the community. 5. That the proposed reclassification of aubject property requires the dedication and improvement of abutting (streets/alleys) in accordance with the Circulation Element of. the General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be generated by the intensification of land use, 6. That petition was preaented with nine signaturea in f~vor of reclassification. 7. That no one aQpeared in oQposition, R-A -1- ~ ~ NOW, THERErOKE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission daes herehy recommc:zd to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that subject Pe.::~;.au for Reelasai.fi-• cation be approved and, by so doing, that Title ].8-Zoning of the P.na}~ein Manicipai Coa~ be amended to exclude the above described property from the R-A, AGRIt`U'~~.UI•'.AL, ZONE, anr? to incorporate said described property into the R-3, PSULTI?:.G FAMILY, Z:~NF. upon the folibWl.ttg conditions which are hereby found to be a necess~ry prerequisite to i:i1e proposed usa c£ subject property in order to preserve the safety and genert~l welfare of the citi:~ens of- the City of Anaheim. (1) That all engineering requiremen`:a ~f Ch~ ~:ity of• Ana;~eiti~ along Savanns Stree:, inc?u3ing preparatto~~t of i~i~provement plar,[i and lustallatlan a£ all irnr'.~-~°ements, suci~ as curbc and aur,`~t•n; ;yf~4eur;i'ka, ~rt•~:~« ~r.~~_?r; ~r.;s~ ~aving, d:.3inage £aci~. '~.='r:, or cther appurte~':~t;h work s::~ll Ue cvmp3i<<c'. wit:i, tr s•,rausixE~ by the City ~t'.:',inet`< >:... in accordance with standsr3 <<;.ans ar~%, e;.eeific~~.?~t;~ <ui .t`#_Ta in ~:hr. :.€fice af r'.: Cit: ::r~;i;neer; ar.d that a bond in an amount aud form satisf~rv •sr=; :~1 Yl;A ;-t1';.y of :'," ~iielm a" ~ 11 oe postwd. ::'ith the City to guarantee the installation o~ chQ »~~?vc ~,~a.,t;:3x:~.:' «;quirc:m~.'`~. (2) That the own~r(s) of su~1._~t pre}~erCy shal.i pay ';o cc, ^iY.} . . . .=i ~ -•~-~- - , - oE $2.00 per front foot alor_~ Savenna Street for at-eet lighting ~+!.a>~•,:.r,es. (3) ThaC the owner(s} of sub,ject property shall pay to the Ci.ty -+f Ar.ahei?.:• ~$un of 15C per front foot along Savanna Street for tree planting purposas. (4) That tra3h storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plana on file with the office of tFe Director of Public Works. (5) That fire hydrants shall'be installed ae required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. (b) That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the east, orest, and north property lines. (7) That all air conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from view, and the sound buffered from adjacent properties. (S) That suuject pcoperty shall be served by undergrourd utilities. (9) That the owner(t~) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appro- priate park and recreetion in-li..u fees as determined to Ue appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time ehe building permit is issued. (10) That drainage of subject property shall be diaposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer. (11) That sewer connection fees shall be paid in accordance with the Savanna Street sewer a~sesoment area on file in the office of the City Engineer. (12) Prior tu the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property, Condition Nos. 1, 2, and 3, above men[ioned, shall be completed. The provisions or rights granted by thia resoiution shall become null and ~oid by action of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within 180 days from the date hereof or such further time as the City Council may grant. (131 That Condition Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, S, l0 and 11, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspectiona. THE FOREGOING RF.SOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 17th day of February, 1972. li'i~ CHAIRMA ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: L SECRETA PRO TEI~i ANAHE C PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIrORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Sg. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) RESOLUTION N0. PC72-26 R2-A "2" ~ ~ ~ I, Lee Burgess, SECretary pro tem of the City Planning Commission of the City of Ansheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City af Anaheim, held on February 7, 1372, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO, GAUER, HERBST, KAYWOOD, ROWLAND, SEYMOUR. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE. ABSENT: CONAtISSIONEAS: ALLRED. IN WITNESS WH~REOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 17th day of February, 1972. i SECR~TARY PRO TEM ANAHEIM CITY P NN COMMISS70N RESOLUTION N0, PC72-26 R2-A "3"