PC 72-260~ ~
RESOLUTION NO. pC72-260
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOA9NENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. ~2'~3'9 BE DISAPPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City oE Maheim did receive e verified Petition for Re-
clessificetionfrom ORANGE COUNTY FLWD CUNTROL DISTRICT, Attention of C. R. Nelson, 400
Civic Center Drive~ Santa Ana, California 92701, Owner; PACIFIC AMERICAN PROPERTI~,S,
INCORPORATED, Attentior. of Bernard Perlir, 3670 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, Cali-
fornia 90010, Agent of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of
Orange, State of California, deacribed as The East half of the Northeast quarter of the
Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 7, Township 4 SaUtih,~Range 10 Weat
in the Rancho Los Coyotes, ae ehown on a map recorded in Book 51, page 10 of Miscellane-
ous Maps, records of Orange County, California
; end
WHEREAS, the City Plonning Commisaion did hold e public hearing et the City Hall in the City of Aneheim
on October 30, 197$t 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of said public headng heving been duly glven es required by
law end in accordnnce with the provielons oE the Meheim Munlclpel Code, Chepter 18.72, to heer and consider
evidence for end egeinst seld Qroposed reclassiEicetion end to investlgete andmeke findings endrecommendetions
in cannection therewith; end
WHEREAS, said Commiesion, after due inepect~on, Investigation, end study mede by itself and in ite be-
half, and after due consideration of el! evldence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the
following £acts:
1. Thet the petitioner proposes a teclessiEicedou of the ebove described property Erom the R-A, AGRICUL-
TURAL, ZONE to the C-1, GENERAL COMMERCIAL, ZONE.
2. That the propoaed reclaeaification is not in conformance with the Gene.ral Plan.
3. That eub,ject property could be ideaily developed with office buildings to con-
tinue the pattern of office structures as exist to the south, rather than establishino ~.
a service atation and convenience market on the property which woul.d be deCrimental to
the aurrounding uses.
4. That the proposed ceclaasification of subject property ie not neceasar•,~ and/or
desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community.
5. That the proposed reclaesification of subjedC property does not properly relate
to the zonea and their permitted uses locally establiehed in close proximity to subject
property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally estahlished throughout the
community.
6. That the C-1 Zone would permit by ri'g"ht the establishment of a service atation
on subject property, bat vhen the vacancy factor of over 15% of se~vice statione through-
out Anaheim is considered and the fact that there are more than 21 service atations with-
in 1~ miles of sub~ect property, the eatabliehment of another aervice atation in this
area would appear to be poor planning.
RD -1 ~ o~v-cs-e
~
~
~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED that the Meheim ^~ity Planning Commission does hereby recommend
to the City Council of the Clty of Aneheim that subje~t Petltion for Recleseification be denied on the besis of the
aEorementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end epproved by me this 9th day of Ncvember, 1972.
~ ~ir ry•~~._~. ._;~~ ~ ~~,~
,i~-, ~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM C TY PLANNING G~OMMISSI~N
AT'TEST: ~' ~ ~ ~~ ~~
%'.
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMiSSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) s$•
CITY OF ANAHETM )
I, Ann Krebe, Secretery oE the City Plenning Commission of the City oE Anaheim, do hereby certify thet the fore-
going resolution wes passed end edopted at e meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, held on
Octobet 30, l972~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereoE:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, GAUER, KAYWOOD, SEYMOUR.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO, HERBST, ROWLAND.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
IN WITN°_SS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend this 9th d~y of November, 1972.
~~~' ~C~r~ai
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMiSSION
RESOLUTION NO. PC72-260
R2•D
-1r