PC 72-28~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. PC72'zR
A RESOLUTION OF T}IE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAlIEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHF.IM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. ~~-72'29 BE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did ceceive e verified Petition for Reelessifica-
tionf:om SEVENTH AND OLIVE CORPORATION, 649 South Olive Street, Suite 808, Los Angeles,
Cmlifornia 90014, Owne,r; CHRISTESON COMPANY, 2100 East 4th Street, Suite Z03, Santa Ana,
California 92701, Agent of certain real propertv situated in the City of Anaheim, County
of Orange, State of California described as That portion of fractional So~theast quarter
of Section 26, Township 4 South, Range 10 West in the Rancho Cajon de Santa Ana, as'shown
on a Map Ehereof recorded in Book 51, Page 10 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of said
Orar.ge County, California, described as follows: Beginning at the most Easterly corner
of Parcel 1 of the land described in deed to Seventh and Olive Corporation, recorded
December 22, 1969 in Book 9169, Page 807 of. Official Records of said County, fiaid corner
being a point in a curve concave Southwesterly having a radius of 770.00 feet, a radia:
iine of said curve passing through said pnint bears, ~orth 42° 39' .58" East; thence leaving
sa~d curve, South 72° 23' 45" West 251.18 fezt; thence North ~1° 36' 15" West 150.00 fe~•i~.;
thence North 72° 23' 45" East 139.34 feet to a point in said curve snentioned above, a
radial line of said curve pasaing throagh sai3 last mentioned point bears North 28° 42' 23"
East; thence Southeasterly along said curve to the point of beginning
; and
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Comrtdssion did hcld a public heating e.t t4E City Aeli in !}.i• City of Anaheim on
February 7, 1972, at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of said public hrbring heria~ been daIy given es required by
(aw end in eccordence with the pcovisions of !he Aneheim Municipal voG°. Ch~oter 13.72, to hear end consider evidence
for end ageinst seid pioposed reelassificateon ~nd to investigate an~ m+%Re fln:iings end cecommendations in connection
therewith; and
WHEREA?, said Commission, vEter due Ir,sp^ctl~n, invest)betlon, end stu~ly ~~ede by itself end in its behelf, end
after due considerbtion of all evidence end reports ofEered et sein heering, does find end dete~mine the folloK~ing fects:
1. That ihe petitioner pcoposes e ceclessificetion of the e:oov~ d~scribed propeRy from the
R-A, AGRICULTURAL, ZONE t~..~ the C-1, Gc,NERAL COMME&CIAL, ZONE.
2. That the scope of the proposed reclassification, if approvc•d, does not warrant an
amendment to the General Plan at the present time; however, its relations~;'_~. to the General
Plan symbol will be considered at Che next annual review.
3. Thet the pcopused reclessification of subject property is necessacy end/or desireble iorthe orderly and pra
per development oi the community.
4. That the proposed re~lessiEicehon oE subJect propedy does properly relete to the zones and their permitted
uses locally estaulished in closa proximity to aubject property and to the zones and thelr permitted uses generelly estab-
lished thcoughout the community.
5. That the proposed recleasificatior subject property requires the dedication and
improvement of abutting streeta in accor.dance with the Circulation Element of the General
Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be generated by the intensifi-
cation of land use.
6. That no one appeared i.n oppoaition to the proposed reclasaification.
R-A '1'
~ ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission doea hereby
recommerd to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that subject Petition for Reclassifica-
tion be approved and, by so doing, that Title 18-2oning of the Anaheim Muaicipal Code be
amended to exclude the above described property fr~m the R-A, AGRICULTURAL, ZONE and to in-
corporate said described property into the C-1, G~NERAL COAII~IERCIAL, ZONE upon the following
conditions which are hereby found to be a necesFary prerequisite to the propoaed use of aub-
ject property in ordei to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the
City of_ Anaheim.
(1) Th~t all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Msanchester Boulevard,
including preparation of improvement plans and installation of all improvements, auch as curbs
and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other. appurtenant
work s'hall be complied with as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard
plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that street lighting
facilities along Manchester Boulevard shall be installed as required by L-h~ Director of Public
Utilities and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the officP of
the Director of Public Utilitie~; and that a bond in an amounC. and form satisfactory to the
City of Anaheim shall be poeted with the City to guarantee the instal.lation of the above men-
*.ioned requirements.
(2) That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim tFe sum of
15C per iront foot along Manchester Boulevard for Cree planting purposes.
(3) That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans o~
File with the office of the Director of Public Works.
(4) That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by
Che Chie£ of the Fire Department.
(5) That a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the ~itg of Anaheim shall be post-
ed with Che City for one year to guarantee the installation of a aix-foot masonry wall along
the southwest, northweat and southeast property lines.
(6) That a parcel map to record the approved division of s~bject property be submitted
to and approved by the City of Anaheim and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County
Reco:der.
(7) That subject property shall be aerved by ur.derground utilities.
(8) That drainage of eubject property shall be disposed of in a manner saCisfactory to
the City Engineer.
(9) That siibject property shall be developed subatantially in accordance witt~ plar,s en+a
apecifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, and 3.
(10) Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property, Condition I~os.
1, 2, 5, and 6, above mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or righCa granted by this
resolution ahall become null and void by action of the City Council unless said conditiona are
complied with within 180 days; or auch further time as L•he City Council may grant.
(11) Thst Con3itior. Nos. 3, 4, 7, S.and 9, above mentioned, shall be coi.•~".ied with prior
to finol building and zoning inspectLons.
THG FOREGOING RESOLUTION is eigned and a r fl by ie t s l.7th day of February, 1972,
~ ~Jfid~~~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEII4 CTTY PLANNING CCDfIfISSION
ATTEST: ~
S C
STATB OF CALIFORNIA ~
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) 38•
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Lee. Burgess, Secretary pro tem of the City Planning Coimnission of lhe City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City
Planning Commisaion of the City of Anaheim, held on February 7, i972, at 2:00 o'clock P.M.,
by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS~ FARANO, G~1UER, HERBST, KAYWOOD, ROWLAND, SEYMOUR.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ttJNE.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED,
IN WITNESS 41HF.REOF, I have hereunto aet my hand this 17th day o February, 1972.
RESOLUT70N N0. PC72-28 SECRETARY PRO T M NAHEIM CITY ? NNING COMMISSION
R2=A