PC 72-37~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. PC72-37
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2331 gE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Varience
from MENASHA CONTAIr]ER CORPORATION OF CALIFORNIA, Attention of Norm E. Koski, 601 East Ball
Road, Anaheim, California 92803, Owner of certain real property situated in the Cfty of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as Lot 24 of Anaheim Extension,
as per Map of Survey made by William Hamel and filed in the office of the County Recorder
of Los Angeles County, California, a copy of which is recorded in Book 3, Pages 163 et seq.
entitled "Los Angeles County Maps," records of said Orange County, described as follows:
Beginning at the Northwesterly corner of said Lot, baing on the Easterly line of Olive Street
49.50 feet wide, as shown on said Map; thence South 15° 26' S9" East 1034.86 feet to the
Southwesterly corner of said Lot, being on the Northerly line of Ball Road 60 feet wide;
thence North 89° 56' S6" East 1164.82 feet to the Southeasterly corner of said Lot, being on
the West~rly line of Orange Street 49.50 feet wide; thence North 15° 24' 36" West 1347.96
feet to the Northeasterly corner of said Lot; thence South 74° 21' 23" West 1123.95 feet to
the point of beginning
; end
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Cortimission did hold a public hearing et the City Hell in the City oE Aneheim
on February 23, 1972, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public hearing heving been du4y given es cequiced
by lew and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipel Code, Chepter 18.68,to hearand consider
evidence for and against said proposed verience end to investigete end meke flndings and recommendations in connec-
tion therewith; and
WHEREAS, seid Commissinn, efter due inspection, investigetion, end study made by iiself and in its behalf,
and aEter due considerstlon of all evid4nce and reports ofEered at said hearing, does Eind and dete~mine the Eollowing
facts:
1. Thet the petitioner requests a variance from the Aneheim Municipel Coda:
SECTTON 18.62.090(b-2) - Minimum height of a f_ree-standing si~n. (8 feet required;
1 foot propoaed)
2. Thet there ere exceptionv.i or extraordinsry cxrcumstences or conditions applicable to 4he property involved
or to the intended use of the property that do not epply generelly to the propecty or class oE use in the same vicinity
and zone.
3. Th~t the requested var,:mce is necessary for the preservation end enjoyment of e suostantial propedy right
posseasad by c;her proper!y ie the seme vicinity and zone, end denied to the property in question.
4. 'f:~at fhe reque•sted variance will not be meterially detrimentet to the public welfece or injurious to the prop-
erty ar improverents in such vicinity nnd zone in which the propeRy is loceted.
S. Thul ro ~sne appeared in opposition.
V1-G '1-
f
/
NOW, THEREF'ORE, BE IT RE~VED thet the Anaheim City Planning Co ission does hereby grant subject
Petition for Verience, upon the following conditior.s which ece heceby found to be a necessary pre:equisite to the pro-
posed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety end general welfare of the Citizens oE the City of
Anaheim:
(1) That aubject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans
and apecifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit No. 1.
TFiE FOREGUING RESOLUTION is ai~ed end approved by me this 2nd day of rch, 1972.
i ~~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
ECRETARY/ANAH ITY PLANNING COMMISSION
PRO TEM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ae.
CITY OF ANAHEIM ) ,
pro tem
I, Lee Burgeas, Secretary~of the City Plenning Commission of the City oE Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing resolution wes passed and adopted et a meeting of the City Planning Cummission of the City oE Anaheim,
held on February 23, 1972, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the foll~wing vote of the mem~ers thereof:
AYES: CflMMIS9I0NERS: FARANO, GAUER, HERBST, KAYWOOD, ROWLAND, SEYMOUR.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto aet my hend this 2nd day of Diarch, 1972.
RESOLUTION NO. PC72-_?
v2-r,
SEC TARY/ANAH ITY 1~LANNING COMMISSION
PRO TEM
_2.