Loading...
PC 72-55~ ~ RESOLUTION NO. PC 72-55 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PT.ANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANA~IEIM REC0~7MENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHETM THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 71'~2'3~ BE APPROVED WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim did receive a veriEi~+d ?etition far Reclassifice- tionfrom HOWARD P. HOUSE, ~/o C~~ldwell Banker Company, 2333 North Broadway, Santa Ana, California 92706, Owner; STANLEY E. BELL, 9776 Katella Avenue, Suite F, Anaheim, California 92804, Agent of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, Coe^.ty of Or.ange, State of California, described as The South one-half of the South 10 ecres of the West 20 acres of the Northwest quarter of the Northaest quarter of Section 18, in Tow-nship 4 Suuth, Range 10 West, in the Rancho Loa Coyotes, ?n the ~ity of Anaheim, as shown on a map thereof recorded in book 51, page 10, Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County. ~XCEPTING THEREFROM the Easteriy 150 feet thereof. ALSO EXGEPTT_IvG TH~REFROM the Wevterly 188 feet khereoE ; and WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hoid a public hearing at the Clty Hall in the City of Anaheim on March 20, 1972, at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of seid public hearing heving been duly given as required by law end in eccocdance with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipel Code, Chaptec 18.72, to hear end considee evidence for and egelnst seid proposed reclessification and to investigete and meke findings and recommendetions in connection therewith; end WHEREAS, said Commission, eEter 3ue inspection, investigetion, end study mede by itself and in its behelf, end efter due consideration of ell evidence and reports offered et said heering, does Eind and determine the Eollowing fects: 1. Thet the petltioner proposes a reclassificetion of the above described property from the C-1~ GENERAL COMMERCIAL, ZONE to the R-3, MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, ZONE, 2. That Che proposed reclaesification ia not in conformance with the land use deaignation of the Anaheim General Plan, 3. That the proposed reclassificetion of s,ibject property is necessery end/or desireble foc the orderly end pro- per development of the community. 4. Thet the pcoposed reclassiElcetion of subjec: pcoperty does properly relete to the zones end their permitted uses locelly established in close proximity to subject property end to the zones and their nermitted uses generally esteb- Ilshed throughout the community. 5. That the proposed reclaseification of subject property requires the dedication and improvement of abutting streete in accordance with the Circulation Element cf the General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in treffic which will be generated by the intensifica- tion of land uae. R..p -1- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT~ SOLVED that the Anahei.m City Pl~anning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that aubject Petition fior Reclassifica- tion be approved and, by so doing, that Title 18-ZoninR of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above described property from the C-1, GENERAL COMMERCIAL, ZONE and to•incorporate said described property into the R-3, MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, ZONE upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the pro- poaed use of suUject property in~order to preserve thn snfety and general welfare of the Gitizens of the CiCy of Anaheim: " (1) That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved 'uy the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange Count} Recorder. (2) That street lighting faci,lities along'Broadway shall be inetelled as required by the Director of Public Utilities and in accordance with standard plane and specifizations on file in the office of the Director of Public Utilil•ies; and that a bond in an amount and. form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the in- ste7.lation of the above mentioned requirements. (3) That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15 cents per front foot along Broadway for tree planting purposes. (4) That trash stora~e areea shall be provided in accordance with approved plane on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. (5) That fire hydranta shall be installed as required and determir.ed to be necessary by the Chief of the Pire Department. (6) That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be conatructed along the east and west Froperty lines. (7) That all air conditioning facilities ehall be properly shielded from view, and the sound buffered from adjacent properties, (8j That subject property ahall be served by underground utilities. (9) That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to Che City of Anaheim t.he appro- priate park and re~reatien in-lieu feea as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, sei.~.', Lees to be peid at the time the building permit is issued. (10) xhat drainage of subject property shall be dlspos~ed of in a manner satisfaceory to the City Engineer. (11) Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property, Condition Nos. 1, 2 and 3, above mentioned, shall be completed. The provieions or rights granted by thia resolution shall become null and void by action of the City Council unless said conditiona are complied wi.th within 180 3ays from the date hereof or such further time as the Gity Council may grant, (12) That Condition Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 10, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. (13) That the completion of these reclassification proceedings is contingent upon the granting of Conditionel Use Permit No. 1297 and Tentative Map of Tract No. 7728. THE FOREGOING R.ESOLUTION ie signed an3 approved b thie 3 h day of March, 1972. ~ Gt~ CHAI N ANAHE CITY PLANNTNG COMMISSI9N ATTEST: ~~ `7S'7~ SECRETARY ANAH IM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Plan- ning Commiseion of the City of Anaheim, held on March 20, 1972, at 2:00 o'clock, P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: CUMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, FARANO, GAUER, HERBST, RAY4100D, ROWLAND. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE. ABSENT: COMhIISSIONERS: SEYMOUR. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hexeunto set my hand thia 30th day uf March, 1972. (~~~ ~~~ - SECRETARY ANAHE;IM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. PC72-55 R2-A '2'