Loading...
PC 72-59RESOLUTI~O. PC72-59 ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHE[M THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT h0. 1299gE GBA6ITED WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a veriEied Fetition for Con- ditional Use Perm~t from DUNN PROPERTIES CORPORATION, 2009 East Edinger Avenue, Santa Ana, California 92702, Owner; DON GROW, 2021 South Flower Street, Los Angeles, California 90007, Agent of cartain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as that portion of Lot 19 of Anaheim FS~tension, as shown on a map of a aurvey made by William Hamel and filed in the office of the County Recorder of Los Angeles County, a copy of which is recorded in book 3, pages 163 and following, entitled "Los Angeles County Maps" in the office of the Recorder of Orenge County, shown as Parcels 2 and 3 on a map recorded in book 37, page 16 of Parcel Maps, records of Orange Cotimty ; end WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Meheim on April 3, 1972, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in eccordence with the provisions of the Meheim Municipel code, Chapter 18.64,to hear end consider evidence for and ageinst seid proposed conditional use and to investigete and make findings end recommendations in connection therewith; end WHEREAS, said Commission, efter due inspection, investigetion, end study made by itself and in its be- halE, end efter due consideration of all evidence and repoRs oEfered et seid hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. Thet the proposed use is properly one for which e Conditional Use Permit is euthorized by Code Section: 18,52.050(2-a and 2-b) to wit: establiah retail distributing firms and aervice bueinesses, including buainess and profesaional offices primarily servi.cing buaineas and industry with incidenCal sales to the public in an industrial complex on subject property. 2, That the Planning Commission has determined that the industriel complex in ques- tion appears to lend itaelE favorably to allowing the proposed types of usee. However, the Commiesion also determined that extreme care should Ue exercised in judging whether speci- fic uses qualify aa retail distributing fitms and/or service business firme, including busi- ness and profeseional offices, primarily serving coimnerce and industry, with only inciden- tal service to the general public. Therefore, any proposed use shall be reviewed by Che Development Services DepartmenC in order that a judgment• may be made as to whether said use qualifiea within the Coimnisaion'~ intent in epproving this Conditional Jae Permit. This review will also provide the opportunity to determine whether sufficient parking ie provid- ed on the site to accommodate an additional parking demand created by auch a use or uses. 3. That in order to provide guidelines for staff determinations, the Planning Commis- sion deems that the following types of uses may be permitted subject to a written request by the petitioner and review aad approval by the Development Services Department: 1) Interior decoral•or, manufacturing drapes, shades, etc. 2) Mattress manufacturing and diatribution 3) Carpet and floor covering dlatribution 4) Wholesale plumbing auppliea 5) Architectural aervices 6) Conetruction oftices and warehouse 7) Jewelry manufacturing and wholesaling 8) Glasa cutting and wholesaling 9) Purniture manufacturing and salea 10) Automotive acceasories warehouae and diatribution 1?) Photography atudio and supply distributors 12) Salea offices and distribution centera 13) Training centera 14) Statione*y aupply sa1~3 15) OL•her uaea deacribed as quasi-co~nercial ~:1-G -1- ~ ~ Whenever disagreement arises between the petitioner and staff as to whether a specific use qualifies under the Flanning Commiaeion~s intent, the matter shall be aubmitted to the Planning Commi.ssion for a determination. 4. That the Planning Commiasion hereby determines that the apec.ific requeat for the establishment of a photuhraphy supply business (Treck Photography Supply) in this location would be appropriate, and said use is hereby granted. S. That approval of the aforementioned types of us~es in no wey relieves the property ovner from providing parking on the basis of the actual use rather than on the basis of in- dustrial parking which was provided on the aite when the camplex was developed, and upon allocation of all the available parking apaces, regardlexs of the number of units still available to be leased, no additional uses may be approved unless adequate parking is pro- vided. 6. That the approved uses will not adversely affect the adjuining land uses and the growth and development of the area in which they are proposed to be located. 7. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use, ae approved, is ade- quate to allow for the full developme~t of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the parLicular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and generAl welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. 8, That the granting of the conditional use permit under the condil•iona impoaed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safeCy, and general welfare of Che citi- zens of the City of Anaheim, hOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the ~naheim City Planning Commission doea hereby grant au~;ect Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the fallowing conditione which are hereby found to be e necessary prerequisite to the pzopoaed use of Che aubject property itt order to preserve the safety and g~neral welfare of the Citizens of the City of Aneheim: (1) That each use proposed to be established on sutject property which is intended to qualify under Section 18.52.050(2-a and 2-b) shall be aubmitted in written foYm to the Development Services Department for review and approval in order that a determinetion mey be made as to whether the proposed ~ise would be appropriate for the site and whetyer auffi- cient parking is provided on the property to accommodate an additional parking demend created by such a use. (2) If a question arises as to the judgment mede by the Development Services Depart- ment concerning a particular requeat, the matter ahall be submitted to the Planning Co~mnie- oion at ita next regular meeting for a determination. (3) That subject property shall be developed eubstantially in accordance with plans end apecificati.ons on file with the City of Anaheim, merked Exhibit iJos. ?, 2, 3, 4, S, o and 7. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is aigned and a proved by me this 13th day of April, 1972. TEMPORARY CHAIRMAN ANAIiEIM CIT PL4 NING C ATTEST:`^7 /'i~/ / ~ fiizi~~ri /'~.a.•G1~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STAT.E OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) sa. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Ann Kreba, Secretary of the City Plannirg Co~ieaion of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was pasaed and adopted at a meeting of the City Plan- ning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held 6II April 3, 2972, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of Che membera Chereaf: AYES: COM@SISSIONERS: ALLRED, GAUER, ICAYWOOD, ROWLAND. NOES: COMMISSIO:IERS: NONE. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO, HERBST, SEYMOJR. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto see my hend this 13th dey of April, 1972. ~!S~ SECREfARY ANAHEIM C'TY PLANNING CC"rSt1ISSI0N RESOLUTION N0. PC72-59 C2-G '2"