Loading...
PC 72-61~ ~ RESOLUTION NO PC7i-61 A RESOLUTION OF TSE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT PETITIOM FOR VARIANCE N0. 2336 gg GRANTED IN PART WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commisaion of tha City of Anaheim did receive e vecified Petition for Vecience from JERRY D. NILSSON, M.D., 1720 West Ball Road, Anaheim, Cali£ornia 92804, Ownpr; CHARLES A. ROSS, 4868 Gondar Avenue, Lakewood, California 90713, Agent of cer*_ain real property situated in the City o£ Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California described as the South 96 feet of the North 481 feet of the East iialf of thc- Evat half of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter and the 5outh 96 feet of the North 481 feet of the East 8 feet of the West half of the East half of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 14, in Township 4 South, Range 11 West, in the Rancho Los Coyotes, as per map recorded in Book 51 Page 11 of Diiscellaneous Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said county. EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed to the State of California by deed recorded March 5, 1951 in Book 2:53 Page 250, Official Records; and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commisaion did hold a publlc hearing at the City Hell in the City of Aneheim on Ap ri 1 3, 19 72 , et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing heving been duly given es required by lew and in accocdence wlth the provisions of the Aneheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.68, to hear end consider evidence Eor and against seid proposed varience end to investigete end make findings end recommendetions in connectian therewlth; and WHEREAS, eaid Commission, efter due inspection, investigation, and study mede by itself and in its behelf, and eEter due consideretion of all evidence and repotts offered at seid hearing, does find end determine the following facts: 1. Thet the,petltione: requests e verience from the Anehelm Municipal ~Code as folloWS: a. SECTZON 18.40.070(2-a-5-a - Minimum side setback.. (10 feet required; 0 feet proposed) b. SECTION 1$.40.070(6-a) - Residential zone boundarv screenin~ r.equirements. 6-fooC high block wall and screen Crees required along the north and south property lines; no block wall nc+r acreen trees proposed) c. SECTION 18.40.070(4-a-1-c) - Minimum ninnber of off-street parkinl~ stal2s. (48 s_paces required; 43 spaces proposed) d. SECTION 18.40.070(3-a) - Maximum building heiRhC• (0 feet permitted; 22 feet proposed) 2. That Waiver 1-c, above mentioned, iB hereby denied on the basis that the pronosed etructure can be redesigned and/or re'locaCed to provide additionel epace to meet the garking requirementa. 3. That Wai.vere 1-a, 1-b, and 1-d, above mentioned,are hereby granted on the baeis L•hat the adjoining R-A residential property is developed with either a motel or commercial usea, therefore these requirements would appear tu be inappropriate. 4. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the p:•operty involved or to the intended uee, as approve~ of the property that do not apply generally to the propQrtp or class of use in the same vicinity and zone. 5. That the requeated variance, ar epproved, is neceas9ry for the preservation and en~oy- ment of a~ubstantial property right ponsesaed by other property ir the same vicinity and zone, and denied to the properl•y in question. 6e That the requested varience, as approved, will r.ot be msterially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is locaCed. Vl _l. ,-<~..~- ^ ~ ~ in part '_ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby gcent~subject Petition for Variance, upon ihe following conditions which ace hereby found to be a necessary prereqaisite to the pro- posed use of the subject p:operty in order to preserve the safety and generel welfece oE the Citizens of the City of Anaheim: (1) That this Variance ia granted subject to the completion of Reclassificatzon No, 71-72-35, now pending. (2) That aubject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans an' specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTI01~1 is siBned end epproved by me this 13 th day o f Ap ri l; 19 7 2. TEMPORARY CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMN.ISSION ATTEST: ~~~G~J~YJ'r/ 'e~'~(ifJei SECRETARY ANANEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) sa. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Ann Krebs, Secretery oE the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do he:eby certify that the foregoing resolution wes passed end edopted at a meeting uf the City Planning Commis~ion ofthe City oE Anaheim, held on Ap ri 1 3, 19 7 2, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by tbe following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, G.4UER, KAYWOOD, ItOWLAND. NOE5: COMMISSIONERS: NONE. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: FARANO, HERBST, SEYMOUR. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hend this 13 th day o f Apri 1', '1'~ 7 2. RESOLUTIOY~ N0. P~~2-61 ~%i~%~5~ SE~RETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION V2-G -2'