PC 72-63~ ~
RESOLUTION N0. ~'C72-63
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMAtISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2342 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Comm:ss3on of the City of Aneheim did ceceive e verified Petition for Veriance from
OTT ~i~ID i7~LTyN HAYS, 946 Norch Sie~ta Strze~, Ar_ahe=m, Califurnia 92801, Owners of certain
real property sit~sted i:. the Cifi;• of AnaE:eim, Coe:::ty of Orange, State of California, described
as Lot No. 197 of Tract No. 1202; and
W[?EREAS, the City Planning Commiselon did hold e publlc hearing et the City Hall In the City of Anehelm on
ApriY 3, i9r`2, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notIce of seld public hearing havin~ bem duly glven es requlred by
lew end in eccordence wIth the proviaiona of the Anaheim Mcniclpel Code, Chepter 18.68, to hear end consider evldence for
end egeinet seid proposed vertance end to inveatiQete end meke findings end tecommendetions in connection therewlth;
end
WHEREAS, eaid Commiasion, efter due inepection, investlgatlon, end study mede by itself end in ite behelf,
end after duc conaiderotion of all evidence and re~orts oEEered at said heering, does find and detrrmine the followinq
fects:
1. Thet the petltioner cequesta e veriance from the Anehelm Municlpel Code as followa:
a. SEC'I:ON 18.'.8,050(4-a~i) - Mir.imi:m r_umber of parkinR etalls. (5 speces required;
4 speces propoeed)
b. SECPTON 18.62.060(~) - Sigr.e permittad in the R-1 Zone_ (1 aquare foot of
lighted ~ign permitted; %'~ square feet of lighted
sign propa~ed)
c. SECTiON 18.24.OY0 - Permitted Use~. (Real ~etate offices no: permitted;
reaY e~tate ofiice proposed)
2. Thet approvel cE tte prcpoe~d u~e wouid 'ue ts^rbmo:~nt to 6pot zoning in that it would
estebPieh a commerci&1 sse ir. a sir:gle family EUbdLV16i0~ which would be delEterious to the
zesidentiaT character of th~ erea.
3. That gra:tir,g s:~bjc~~ pe~ition wc4ln 'be gra-t.ng the petitior.er a privilege not en-
joyed by other properry cw:ere in tFi~ area ~r.d co~ld e~i',ablish an undesirable precedent for
similar reque~ts for comm~rcial ~se of resicer.tial propertiea throughout the City.
4. Thst eubje~*_ propert~ i~ not loceted in ar, azea that was conaidered in the adopted
Study of R.esider.ti5~1 Nom~¢ Crot:ting onto ?.rteri5l Highways, and thus does not qualify as a
reaider.tial structure that irt apprapriete for commercial u3es.
S. That there ie sr sbuarl~ac~ of ecmmercisl property evaileble in the City and in the
immediate area, therefore, th*_~e ic. no need to cor.vert additioral residentisl properties to
commercial u3e.
5. Thst t}.e exieting nocar~ pubSi~ eErvi.ce w~a e6tablished while the property was under
the juriediction of the CoLr,t~ a::;P, ti~~refore, q~elifiea Lt t~s a legsl non-conf.ormin~ use.
V1-D -1~
~ ~
7. That t:.ere are no excep~.ional or exLraorcl_nar~• circu sca~ices c~;: coi~diti.ons applica6le to~
the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to the
property or class of use in the same ~icinity and zone.
8. That the requestr_d variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right posseased by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and denied
to the property in ~ueation.
9. That the requested variance will be materially tletrimental to the public welfare or in-
jurioua to the prope:ty or improvements in such vicinity and zene 3.n which the property is lo-
cated.
t~'OW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Flanning Commission does hereby deny subject
Petition for Verience on the basls oE the eforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is slgned and epproved by me this 13 ~h day of Apri 1, 19 72 .
TEMPORARY CHAIRMAN AIQAHEIM CITY PLANNING C~MMISSION
ATTEST:
~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CdL1FORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ant}~ k.se~s,t; Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hereby cedify thet the fore-
going resolution wes passed end edoptr.d et a meeting of the City Plenning Commission ofthe City of Aneheim,lield on
Ap ri 1 3, 19 7 2, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote oE the membtcs thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, GAUER, KAYWOOD, ROWLAND.
NOES: COMMISSIONGRS: NONE,
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: FA?tAi10, HERBST, SEYMOUR.
IN WITNESS WiiEREOF, I heve her>unto set my hand this 13 th day o f Ap ri 1, 19 7 2.
RESOLUTION N0. PC72-63
~ ~/~ /~!~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNfNG COh1MISSION
V2-D -2-