PC 72-84RESOLUTION~ . PC72-84 ~ ` `~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNiNG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1308 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition Eor Con-
ditional Use Permit from Tli~ SOUTHLAND CORPORATION, 2828 North Haskell Avenue, Dallas, Texas
75204, Owner; S, RICNMOND DOLE, Assistant Secretary, The Southland Corporation, Post
Office Box 698, La Mesa, California 92041, Agent of certain real property situated in
the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows: That
portion ~f LoC S of Anaheim Extension, as per Mep of Survey made by TJilliam Hamel, deted
and scknowledged on December 11, 1868 by A. Robinson, Trustee and fiT'ed in the office of
the County Recorder of Los Angeles Coiinty, described as followa: Beginning at the South-
west corner of said Lot 8, said corner being recognized as the intersection of the center
line of Santa Ana Avenue, 49.50 feet in width, with the Easterly line, or the extension
thereof, of East Streec, 66 feet in width, and running thence North 13° 23' O1" West along
said Easterly line of Eaat Street, 201.50 feet; thence North 74° 31' T5" East parallel
with said center'line of Santa Ana Avenue, 110 feet; thence South 15° 23' O1" Eaet paral-
leY with said Easterly line of East Street 201.5U feet to said center line of Santa Ana
Avenue; thence South 74° 31' 15" West along said center line, 110 feet to the point of
beginning. EXCEPTING THEREFROM the Southeasterly 24.75 feet included within the North-
er?y half of Santa Ana Avenue
; and
IVHERCAS, the CityPlanning Commission did hold e public heering et the CityHall in the City of Anaheim
on May 1, 1972 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice oE said public hearing heving been duly given
as requixed by law and in accordence with the provisions of the Meheim Municipal code, Chepter 18.64,to hear
and consider evidence for e.nd against seid pcoposed conditional use and to investigate and make findings end
recommendations in cannection therewith; end
WHERF.AS, seid Commission, efter due inspection, investigetion, ar.d study mede by itself and in its be-
half, and after due consideretion oE a11 evidence and reports offered at seid hearing, does find and determine the
Eollowing facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a Conditional TJse Permit is authorized by Code
Section 18.40.06Q(c) to wit: establish gasoline pumps in conjunction with
an existing food store and located within 75 feet of residentially zoned
and developed property.
2. That the Planning Commission recommended disapprova?. of the original
C-1 reclassification request as being an undesirable use in Che center of a
residential area.
3. That there has been n~ lan3 use change since the last time an
idzntical request had been denied on this property by the Planning
Commission and City Council to warrant ~avorable consideration of subject
petition •st this time.
4. That approval of subject petition would be granting a privilege
not enjoyed by other similar businesses throughout the city and would
establish a precedent for similar requests.
5. That approval o£ subject petition would aompound an already serious
vacancy factor since 20-25~ of the existing se~vice stations are now vacant.
6. That approval of subject petition would create additional traffic
problems to the adjoining res.idential uses as well as odors and noises from
servicing the vehicles with gasoline.
7. That one person appeared and submitted a petition signed by eleven
adjoining residents, all in opposition to subject petition.
CI-D ' 1-
~
~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Aneheim City Planning Commission does hereby deny subj~ect
Petition for Conditionnl Use Permit on the besis of the aforementioaed findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epproved by m is llth da f May, 1972.
! ~
~HAIRMAN ANAHEIM C1TY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATT~ST:
l ~C/~v~/ i~~'~c.~sfl'
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE QF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) S$•
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, ., Seccetery of the City Planaing Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify thet the fore-
going resolution wes pessed end edopted et n meeting oE the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, hel@ on
May 1, 1972, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the tallowing vote of the membecs thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, FARANO, GAUER, HERBST, KAYWOOD, SEYMOUR.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ROWLAND.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hand this llth day of May, 1972.
RESOLUTION N0. PC72-84
~i~/!~i!?/ %~~'Z.liG`?/
~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
C2-D -2-